The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Human In Silico Drug Trials Demonstrate Higher Accuracy than Animal Models in Predicting Clinical Pro-Arrhythmic Cardiotoxicity
Open accessAbstract
Early prediction of cardiotoxicity is critical for drug development. Current animal models raise ethical and translational questions, and have limited accuracy in clinical risk prediction. Human-based computer models constitute a fast, cheap and potentially effective alternative to experimental assays, also facilitating translation to human. Key challenges include consideration of inter-cellular variability in drug responses and integration of computational and experimental methods in safety pharmacology. Our aim is to evaluate the ability of in silico drug trials in populations of human action potential (AP) models to predict clinical risk of drug-induced arrhythmias based on ion channel information, and to compare simulation results against experimental assays commonly used for drug testing. A control population of 1,213 human ventricular AP models in agreement with experimental recordings was constructed. In silico drug trials were performed for 62 reference compounds at multiple concentrations, using pore-block drug models (IC50/Hill coefficient). Drug-induced changes in AP biomarkers were quantified, together with occurrence of repolarisation/depolarisation abnormalities. Simulation results were used to predict clinical risk based on reports of Torsade de Pointes arrhythmias, and further evaluated in a subset of compounds through comparison with electrocardiograms from rabbit wedge preparations and Ca2+-transient recordings in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPS-CMs). Drug-induced changes in silico vary in magnitude depending on the specific ionic profile of each model in the population, thus allowing to identify cell sub-populations at higher risk of developing abnormal AP phenotypes. Models with low repolarisation reserve (increased Ca2+/late Na+ currents and Na+/Ca2+-exchanger, reduced Na+/K+-pump) are highly vulnerable to drug-induced repolarisation abnormalities, while those with reduced inward current density (fast/late Na+ and Ca2+ currents) exhibit high susceptibility to depolarisation abnormalities. Repolarisation abnormalities in silico predict clinical risk for all compounds with 89% accuracy. Drug-induced changes in biomarkers are in overall agreement across different assays: in silico AP duration changes reflect the ones observed in rabbit QT interval and hiPS-CMs Ca2+-transient, and simulated upstroke velocity captures variations in rabbit QRS complex. Our results demonstrate that human in silico drug trials constitute a powerful methodology for prediction of clinical pro-arrhythmic cardiotoxicity, ready for integration in the existing drug safety assessment pipelines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The future of drug safety testing: expanding the view and narrowing the focus
Stevens, J. L., & Baker, T. K. (2009) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2008.11.009 · Cited by 286
Cited by
Limitations of Animal Studies for Predicting Toxicity in Clinical Trials
Van Norman, G. A. (2019) · JACC: Basic to Translational Science · doi:10.1016/j.jacbts.2019.10.008 · Cited by 732
Pound, P., & Ritskes-Hoitinga, M. (2018) · Journal of Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12967-018-1678-1 · Cited by 419
Blinova, K., Dang, Q., Millard, D., Smith, G., Pierson, J., Guo, L., Brock, M., Lu, H. R., Kraushaar, U., Zeng, H., et al. (2018) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.08.079 · Cited by 373
Self-citationViceconti, M., Pappalardo, F., Rodriguez, B., Horner, M., Bischoff, J., & Musuamba Tshinanu, F. (2021) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2020.01.011 · Cited by 361
“This class of trial exploits human-based modelling and simulation technologies for virtual testing of pharmacological therapies [7] and devices [8].”
BackgroundValidation and Trustworthiness of Multiscale Models of Cardiac Electrophysiology
Pathmanathan, P., & Gray, R. A. (2018) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2018.00106 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Passini, E., Britton, O. J., Lu, H. R., Rohrbacher, J., Hermans, A. N., Gallacher, D. J., Greig, R. J. H., Bueno-Orovio, A., & Rodriguez, B.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Physiology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2017-09-12
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- 668-668
- ISSN
- 1664-042X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2754002459
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human In Silico Drug Trials Demonstrate Higher Accuracy than Animal Models in Predicting Clinical Pro-Arrhythmic Cardiotoxicity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fphys.2017.00668
- The paper
- Passini, E., Britton, O. J., Lu, H. R., Rohrbacher, J., Hermans, A. N., Gallacher, D. J., Greig, R. J. H., Bueno-Orovio, A., & Rodriguez, B. (2017). Human In Silico Drug Trials Demonstrate Higher Accuracy than Animal Models in Predicting Clinical Pro-Arrhythmic Cardiotoxicity. Frontiers in Physiology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00668
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.