The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The transcriptional regulatory network in the drought response and its crosstalk in abiotic stress responses including drought, cold, and heat
Open accessAbstract
Drought negatively impacts plant growth and the productivity of crops around the world. Understanding the molecular mechanisms in the drought response is important for improvement of drought tolerance using molecular techniques. In plants, abscisic acid (ABA) is accumulated under osmotic stress conditions caused by drought, and has a key role in stress responses and tolerance. Comprehensive molecular analyses have shown that ABA regulates the expression of many genes under osmotic stress conditions, and the ABA-responsive element (ABRE) is the major cis-element for ABA-responsive gene expression. Transcription factors (TFs) are master regulators of gene expression. ABRE-binding protein and ABRE-binding factor TFs control gene expression in an ABA-dependent manner. SNF1-related protein kinases 2, group A 2C-type protein phosphatases, and ABA receptors were shown to control the ABA signaling pathway. ABA-independent signaling pathways such as dehydration-responsive element-binding protein TFs and NAC TFs are also involved in stress responses including drought, heat, and cold. Recent studies have suggested that there are interactions between the major ABA signaling pathway and other signaling factors in stress responses. The important roles of these TFs in crosstalk among abiotic stress responses will be discussed. Control of ABA or stress signaling factor expression can improve tolerance to environmental stresses. Recent studies using crops have shown that stress-specific overexpression of TFs improves drought tolerance and grain yield compared with controls in the field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Liu, Q., Kasuga, M., Sakuma, Y., Abe, H., Miura, S., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., & Shinozaki, K. (1998) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.10.8.1391 · Cited by 3,044
Self-citation
Cited by
Diverse roles of jasmonates and ethylene in abiotic stress tolerance
Kazan, K. (2015) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2015.02.001 · Cited by 854
Transcriptional regulation of drought response: a tortuous network of transcriptional factors
Singh, D., & Laxmi, A. (2015) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2015.00895 · Cited by 462
The role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in plant drought stress responses
Chieb, M., & Gachomo, E. W. (2023) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/s12870-023-04403-8 · Cited by 404
CRISPR/cas9 genome editing in wheat
Kim, D., Alptekin, B., & Budak, H. (2018) · Functional & Integrative Genomics · doi:10.1007/s10142-017-0572-x · Cited by 365
Chen, J., Chopra, R., Hayes, C., Morris, G., Marla, S., Burke, J., Xin, Z., & Burow, G. (2017) · The Plant Genome · doi:10.3835/plantgenome2016.09.0091 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Nakashima, K., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., & Shinozaki, K.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Plant Science
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2014-05-16
- Volume
- 5
- Pages
- 170-170
- ISSN
- 1664-462X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2008547518
- Cited by
- 891
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 75.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The transcriptional regulatory network in the drought response and its crosstalk in abiotic stress responses including drought, cold, and heat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fpls.2014.00170
- The paper
- Nakashima, K., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., & Shinozaki, K. (2014). The transcriptional regulatory network in the drought response and its crosstalk in abiotic stress responses including drought, cold, and heat. Frontiers in Plant Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00170
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.