The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Calcium-Mediated Abiotic Stress Signaling in Roots
Open accessAbstract
Roots are subjected to a range of abiotic stresses as they forage for water and nutrients. Cytosolic free calcium is a common second messenger in the signaling of abiotic stress. In addition, roots take up calcium both as a nutrient and to stimulate exocytosis in growth. For calcium to fulfill its multiple roles must require strict spatio-temporal regulation of its uptake and efflux across the plasma membrane, its buffering in the cytosol and its sequestration or release from internal stores. This prompts the question of how specificity of signaling output can be achieved against the background of calcium's other uses. Threats to agriculture such as salinity, water availability and hypoxia are signaled through calcium. Nutrient deficiency is also emerging as a stress that is signaled through cytosolic free calcium, with progress in potassium, nitrate and boron deficiency signaling now being made. Heavy metals have the capacity to trigger or modulate root calcium signaling depending on their dose and their capacity to catalyze production of hydroxyl radicals. Mechanical stress and cold stress can both trigger an increase in root cytosolic free calcium, with the possibility of membrane deformation playing a part in initiating the calcium signal. This review addresses progress in identifying the calcium transporting proteins (particularly channels such as annexins and cyclic nucleotide-gated channels) that effect stress-induced calcium increases in roots and explores links to reactive oxygen species, lipid signaling, and the unfolded protein response.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kim, K.-N., Cheong, Y. H., Grant, J. J., Pandey, G. K., & Luan, S. (2003) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.006858 · Cited by 406
Kurusu, T., Nishikawa, D., Yamazaki, Y., Gotoh, M., Nakano, M., Hamada, H., Yamanaka, T., Iida, K., Nakagawa, Y., Saji, H., et al. (2012) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2229-12-11 · Cited by 130
Cited by
How Plants Sense and Respond to Stressful Environments
Lamers, J., van der Meer, T., & Testerink, C. (2020) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.19.01464 · Cited by 512
Siddiqui, M. H., Alamri, S., Nasir Khan, M., Corpas, F. J., Al-Amri, A. A., Alsubaie, Q. D., Ali, H. M., Kalaji, H. M., & Ahmad, P. (2020) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122882 · Cited by 319
Mechanisms of Plasma-Seed Treatments as a Potential Seed Processing Technology
Waskow, A., Howling, A., & Furno, I. (2021) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2021.617345 · Cited by 172
Arabidopsis calmodulin‐like proteins CML13 and CML14 interact with proteins that have IQ domains
Teresinski, H. J., Hau, B., Symonds, K., Kilburn, R., Munro, K. A., Doner, N. M., Mullen, R., Li, V. H., & Snedden, W. A. (2023) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/pce.14616 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilkins, K. A., Matthus, E., Swarbreck, S. M., & Davies, J. M.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Plant Science
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2016-08-29
- Volume
- 7
- Pages
- 1296-1296
- ISSN
- 1664-462X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2518174488
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Calcium-Mediated Abiotic Stress Signaling in Roots. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fpls.2016.01296
- The paper
- Wilkins, K. A., Matthus, E., Swarbreck, S. M., & Davies, J. M. (2016). Calcium-Mediated Abiotic Stress Signaling in Roots. Frontiers in Plant Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01296
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.