Cited by 70Microbial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyGene Regulatory Network Analysis

Development of SyneBrick Vectors As a Synthetic Biology Platform for Gene Expression in Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942

Open access
Kim, Wook Jin, Lee, Sun-Mi, Um, Youngsoon, Sim, Sang Jun, Woo, Han Min·2017·Frontiers in Plant Science

Abstract

Cyanobacteria are oxygenic photosynthetic prokaryotes that are able to assimilate CO2 using solar energy and water. Metabolic engineering of cyanobacteria has suggested the possibility of direct CO2 conversion to value-added chemicals. However, engineering of cyanobacteria has been limited due to the lack of various genetic tools for expression and control of multiple genes to reconstruct metabolic pathways for biochemicals from CO2. Thus, we developed SyneBrick vectors as a synthetic biology platform for gene expression in Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942 as a model cyanobacterium. The SyneBrick chromosomal integration vectors provide three inducible expression systems to control gene expression and three neutral sites for chromosomal integrations. Using a SyneBrick vector, LacI-regulated gene expression led to 24-fold induction of the eYFP reporter gene with 1 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) inducer in S. elongatus PCC 7942 under 5% (v/v) CO2. TetR-regulated gene expression led to 19-fold induction of the GFP gene when 100 nM anhydrotetracycline (aTc) inducer was used. Gene expression decreased after 48 h due to degradation of aTc under light. T7 RNA polymerase-based gene expression resulted in efficient expression with a lower IPTG concentration than a previously developed pTrc promoter. A library of T7 promoters can be used for tunable gene expression. In summary, SyneBrick vectors were developed as a synthetic biology platform for gene expression in S. elongatus PCC 7942. These results will accelerate metabolic engineering of biosolar cell factories through expressing and controlling multiple genes of interest.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpls.2017.00293

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neutral integration sites have been identified and characterised in commonly used cyanobacterial model organisms, such as Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 and Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942, providing reliable genomic locations for the stable insertion of heterologous genes and engineered metabolic pathways.

    “Neutral integration sites have been identified and characterised in commonly used cyanobacterial model organisms, such as Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 and Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942, providing reliable genomic locations for the stable insertion of heterologous genes and engineered metabolic pathways [94,95].”

    From Cyanobacteria as a Photosynthetic Chassis for Metabolic Pathway Engineering with Heterologous Gene Expression (2026) · cites this paper as [95]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 70

Authors
Kim, W. J., Lee, S.-M., Um, Y., Sim, S. J., & Woo, H. M.
Affiliations
  • Korea University (KR)
  • Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
  • Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
Corresponding author
Woo, Han Min
Venue
Frontiers in Plant Science
Published
2017-03-02
Volume
8
Pages
293-293
ISSN
1664-462X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2595281090
Cited by
70
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4
FWCI
4.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Plant Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (2014M1A8A1049277)
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (2016, University-Institute Cooperation program)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942, cyanobacteria, expression vectors, chromosomal integration, T7 RNA polymerase, IPTG, anhydrotetracycline, T7 promoter, metabolic engineering, CO2 conversion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review