The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Integrated Approach of Agri-nanotechnology: Challenges and Future Trends
Open accessAbstract
Nanotechnology representing a new frontier in modern agriculture is anticipated to become a major thrust in near future by offering potential applications. This integrating approach i.e. agri-nanotechnology has great potential to cope with global challenges of food production/security, sustainability and climate change. However, despite the potential benefits of nanotechnology in agriculture so far, their relevance has not reached up to the field conditions. The elevating concerns about fate, transport, bioavailability, nanoparticles toxicity and inappropriateness of regulatory framework limit the complete acceptance and inclination to adopt nanotechnologies in agricultural sector. Moreover, the current research trends lack realistic approach that fail to attain comprehensive knowledge of risk assessment factors and further toxicity of nanoparticles towards agroecosystem components viz. plant, soil, soil microbiomes after their release into the environment. Hence in the present review we attempt to suggest certain key points to be addressed in the current and future agri-nanotechnology researches on the basis of recognized knowledge gaps with strong recommendation of incorporating biosynthesized nanoparticles to carry out analogous functions. In this perspective, the major points are as follows: (i) Mitigating risk assessment factors (responsible for fate, transport, behavior, bioavailability and toxicity) for alleviating the subsequent toxicity of nanoparticles. (ii) Optimizing permissible level of nanoparticles dose within the safety limits by performing dose dependent studies. (iii) Adopting realistic approach by designing the experiments in natural habitat and avoiding in vitro assays for accurate interpretation. (iv) Most importantly, translating environmental friendly and non-toxic biosynthesized nanoparticles from laboratory to field conditions for agricultural benefits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Greener approach to nanomaterials and their sustainable applications
Varma, R. S. (2012) · Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.coche.2011.12.002 · Cited by 358
Cited by
Ali, A., Shah, T., Ullah, R., Zhou, P., Guo, M., Ovais, M., Tan, Z., & Rui, Y. (2021) · Frontiers in Chemistry · doi:10.3389/fchem.2021.629054 · Cited by 650
Use of botanical insecticides for sustainable agriculture: Future perspectives
Campos, E. V. R., Proença, P. L. F., Oliveira, J. L., Bakshi, M., Abhilash, P. C., & Fraceto, L. F. (2019) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.04.038 · Cited by 412
Self-citationKim, D., Kadam, A., Shinde, S., Saratale, R. G., Patra, J., & Ghodake, G. (2018) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.8749 · Cited by 312
Nanomaterials in plant tissue culture: The disclosed and undisclosed
Kim, D. H., Gopal, J., & Sivanesan, I. (2017) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c7ra07025j · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Mishra, S., Keswani, C., Abhilash, P. C., Fraceto, L. F., & Singh, H. B.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Plant Science
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2017-04-04
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- 471-471
- ISSN
- 1664-462X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2604394105
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integrated Approach of Agri-nanotechnology: Challenges and Future Trends. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fpls.2017.00471
- The paper
- Mishra, S., Keswani, C., Abhilash, P. C., Fraceto, L. F., & Singh, H. B. (2017). Integrated Approach of Agri-nanotechnology: Challenges and Future Trends. Frontiers in Plant Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00471
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.