The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Timing Is Important: Unmanned Aircraft vs. Satellite Imagery in Plant Invasion Monitoring
Open accessAbstract
The rapid spread of invasive plants makes their management increasingly difficult. Remote sensing offers a means of fast and efficient monitoring, but still the optimal methodologies remain to be defined. The seasonal dynamics and spectral characteristics of the target invasive species are important, since, at certain time of the vegetation season (e.g. at flowering or senescing), plants are often more distinct (or more visible beneath the canopy). Our aim was to establish fast, repeatable and a cost-efficient, computer-assisted method applicable over larger areas, to reduce the costs of extensive field campaigns. To achieve this goal, we examined how the timing of monitoring affects the detection of noxious plant invaders in Central Europe, using two model herbaceous species with markedly different phenological, structural and spectral characteristics. They are giant hogweed (Heracleum mantegazzianum), a species with very distinct flowering phase, and the less distinct knotweeds (Fallopia japonica, F. sachalinensis and their hybrid F. ×bohemica). The variety of data generated, such as imagery from purposely-designed, unmanned aircraft vehicle (UAV) and VHR satellite, and aerial colour orthophotos enabled us to assess the effects of spectral, spatial and temporal resolution (i.e., the target species’ phenological state) for successful recognition. The demands for both spatial and spectral resolution depended largely on the target plant species. In the case that a species was sampled at the most distinct phenological phase, high accuracy was achieved even with lower spectral resolution of our low-cost UAV. This demonstrates that proper timing can to some extent compensate for the lower spectral resolution. The results of our study could serve as a basis for identifying priorities for management, targeted at localities with the greatest risk of invasive species’ spread and, once eradicated, to monitor over time any return. The best mapping strategy should reflect morphological and structural features of the target plant and choose appropriate spatial, spectral and temporal resolution. The UAV enables flexible data acquisition for required time periods at low cost and is, therefore, well suited for targeted monitoring; while satellite imagery provides the best solution for larger areas. Nonetheless, users must be aware of their limits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Textural Features for Image Classification
Haralick, R. M., Shanmugam, K., & Dinstein, I. (1973) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tsmc.1973.4309314 · Cited by 22,886
Random forests for classification in ecology
Cutler, D. R., Edwards, T. C., Beard, K. H., Cutler, A., Hess, K. T., Gibson, J., & Lawler, J. J. (2007) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/07-0539.1 · Cited by 4,950
Invasive Species, Environmental Change and Management, and Health
Pyšek, P., & Richardson, D. M. (2010) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-033009-095548 · Cited by 1,406
Self-citation
Cited by
Invasive alien plant species: Their impact on environment, ecosystem services and human health
Kumar Rai, P., & Singh, J. S. (2020) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.106020 · Cited by 616
Drones for Conservation in Protected Areas: Present and Future
Jiménez López, J., & Mulero-Pázmány, M. (2019) · Drones · doi:10.3390/drones3010010 · Cited by 300
UAV & satellite synergies for optical remote sensing applications: A literature review
Alvarez-Vanhard, E., Corpetti, T., & Houet, T. (2021) · Science of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.srs.2021.100019 · Cited by 285
Kattenborn, T., Lopatin, J., Förster, M., Braun, A. C., & Fassnacht, F. E. (2019) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2019.03.025 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Müllerová, J., Brůna, J., Bartaloš, T., Dvořák, P., Vítková, M., & Pyšek, P.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Plant Science
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2017-05-31
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- 887-887
- ISSN
- 1664-462X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2620234846
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Timing Is Important: Unmanned Aircraft vs. Satellite Imagery in Plant Invasion Monitoring. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fpls.2017.00887
- The paper
- Müllerová, J., Brůna, J., Bartaloš, T., Dvořák, P., Vítková, M., & Pyšek, P. (2017). Timing Is Important: Unmanned Aircraft vs. Satellite Imagery in Plant Invasion Monitoring. Frontiers in Plant Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00887
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.