The DOI matches its Crossref record; 123 of the 123 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Plant Abiotic Stress Proteomics: The Major Factors Determining Alterations in Cellular Proteome
Open accessAbstract
Major environmental and genetic factors determining stress-related protein abundance are discussed.Major aspects of protein biological function including protein isoforms and PTMs, cellular localization and protein interactions are discussed.Functional diversity of protein isoforms and PTMs is discussed. Abiotic stresses reveal profound impacts on plant proteomes including alterations in protein relative abundance, cellular localization, post-transcriptional and post-translational modifications (PTMs), protein interactions with other protein partners, and, finally, protein biological functions. The main aim of the present review is to discuss the major factors determining stress-related protein accumulation and their final biological functions. A dynamics of stress response including stress acclimation to altered ambient conditions and recovery after the stress treatment is discussed. The results of proteomic studies aimed at a comparison of stress response in plant genotypes differing in stress adaptability reveal constitutively enhanced levels of several stress-related proteins (protective proteins, chaperones, ROS scavenging- and detoxification-related enzymes) in the tolerant genotypes with respect to the susceptible ones. Tolerant genotypes can efficiently adjust energy metabolism to enhanced needs during stress acclimation. Stress tolerance vs. stress susceptibility are relative terms which can reflect different stress-coping strategies depending on the given stress treatment. The role of differential protein isoforms and PTMs with respect to their biological functions in different physiological constraints (cellular compartments and interacting partners) is discussed. The importance of protein functional studies following high-throughput proteome analyses is presented in a broader context of plant biology. In summary, the manuscript tries to provide an overview of the major factors which have to be considered when interpreting data from proteomic studies on stress-treated plants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mechanisms of Salinity Tolerance
Munns, R., & Tester, M. (2008) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911 · Cited by 13,792
Comparative physiology of salt and water stress
Munns, R. (2002) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00808.x · Cited by 6,331
S ALT AND D ROUGHT S TRESS S IGNAL T RANSDUCTION IN P LANTS
Zhu, J.-K. (2002) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.091401.143329 · Cited by 5,835
Abiotic stress, the field environment and stress combination
Mittler, R. (2006) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2005.11.002 · Cited by 3,083
Salinity tolerance in halophytes*
Flowers, T. J., & Colmer, T. D. (2008) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02531.x · Cited by 2,789
Abiotic and biotic stress combinations
Suzuki, N., Rivero, R. M., Shulaev, V., Blumwald, E., & Mittler, R. (2014) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12797 · Cited by 2,153
Pentatricopeptide Repeat Proteins in Plants
Barkan, A., & Small, I. (2014) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040159 · Cited by 1,031
Kosová, K., Vítámvás, P., Prášil, I. T., & Renaut, J. (2011) · Journal of Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2011.02.006 · Cited by 852
Self-citationPlant salt tolerance: adaptations in halophytes
Flowers, T. J., & Colmer, T. D. (2015) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcu267 · Cited by 835
Pot size matters: a meta-analysis of the effects of rooting volume on plant growth
Poorter, H., Bühler, J., van Dusschoten, D., Climent, J., & Postma, J. A. (2012) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp12049 · Cited by 834
Cited by
Arif, Y., Singh, P., Siddiqui, H., Bajguz, A., & Hayat, S. (2020) · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.08.042 · Cited by 1,316
The Role of the Plant Antioxidant System in Drought Tolerance
Laxa, M., Liebthal, M., Telman, W., Chibani, K., & Dietz, K.-J. (2019) · Antioxidants · doi:10.3390/antiox8040094 · Cited by 855
Multidimensional role of silicon to activate resilient plant growth and to mitigate abiotic stress
Mir, R. A., Bhat, B. A., Yousuf, H., Islam, S. T., Raza, A., Rizvi, M. A., Charagh, S., Albaqami, M., Sofi, P. A., & Zargar, S. M. (2022) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.819658 · Cited by 178
Metadata
- Authors
- Kosová, K., Vítámvás, P., Urban, M. O., Prášil, I. T., & Renaut, J.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Plant Science
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2018-02-08
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 122-122
- ISSN
- 1664-462X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2792108715
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 123
- FWCI
- 26.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plant Abiotic Stress Proteomics: The Major Factors Determining Alterations in Cellular Proteome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fpls.2018.00122
- The paper
- Kosová, K., Vítámvás, P., Urban, M. O., Prášil, I. T., & Renaut, J. (2018). Plant Abiotic Stress Proteomics: The Major Factors Determining Alterations in Cellular Proteome. Frontiers in Plant Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00122
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.