The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ionizing Radiation, Higher Plants, and Radioprotection: From Acute High Doses to Chronic Low Doses
Open accessAbstract
Understanding the effects of ionizing radiation (IR) on plants is important for environmental protection, for agriculture and horticulture, and for space science but plants have significant biological differences to the animals from which much relevant knowledge is derived. The effects of IR on plants are understood best at acute high doses because there have been; (a) controlled experiments in the field using point sources, (b) field studies in the immediate aftermath of nuclear accidents, and (c) controlled laboratory experiments. A compilation of studies of the effects of IR on plants reveals that although there are numerous field studies of the effects of chronic low doses on plants, there are few controlled experiments that used chronic low doses. Using the Bradford-Hill criteria widely used in epidemiological studies we suggest that a new phase of chronic low-level radiation research on plants is desirable if its effects are to be properly elucidated. We emphasize the plant biological contexts that should direct such research. We review previously reported effects from the molecular to community level and, using a plant stress biology context, discuss a variety of acute high- and chronic low-dose data against Derived Consideration Reference Levels (DCRLs) used for environmental protection. We suggest that chronic low-level IR can sometimes have effects at the molecular and cytogenetic level at DCRL dose rates (and perhaps below) but that there are unlikely to be environmentally significant effects at higher levels of biological organization. We conclude that, although current data meets only some of the Bradford-Hill criteria, current DCRLs for plants are very likely to be appropriate at biological scales relevant to environmental protection (and for which they were intended) but that research designed with an appropriate biological context and with more of the Bradford-Hill criteria in mind would strengthen this assertion. We note that the effects of IR have been investigated on only a small proportion of plant species and that research with a wider range of species might improve not only the understanding of the biological effects of radiation but also that of the response of plants to environmental stress.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The effects of gamma rays on plant growth and development are diverse, ranging from stimulatory to inhibitory responses (Jan et al., 2012; Caplin and Willey, 2018; Zhao et al., 2020), depending on factors such as radiation dose, plant species, age, genome organization, physiology, and morphology (Amirikhah et al., 2021; Gudkov et al., 2019)”
From Effect of gamma irradiation on the uptake, translocation, and phytotoxicity of lead and cadmium in a soil–barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) system (2025) · cites this paper as Caplin and Willey, 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Friedberg, E. C. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01408 · Cited by 1,177
Endosymbiosis and Eukaryotic Cell Evolution
Archibald, J. M. (2015) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.07.055 · Cited by 654 · cited 2×
“Eukaryotic life (Archibald, 2015) probably began >2.”
BackgroundInfluentialActions of ultraviolet light on cellular structures
Pattison, D. I., & Davies, M. J. (2006) · Experientia Supplementum · doi:10.1007/3-7643-7378-4_6 · Cited by 283
Cited by
Wang, X., Hao, B., Ma, J., & Wang, J. (2025) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2025.1729964 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Caplin, N., & Willey, N.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Plant Science
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2018-06-26
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 847-847
- ISSN
- 1664-462X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2807596755
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ionizing Radiation, Higher Plants, and Radioprotection: From Acute High Doses to Chronic Low Doses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fpls.2018.00847
- The paper
- Caplin, N., & Willey, N. (2018). Ionizing Radiation, Higher Plants, and Radioprotection: From Acute High Doses to Chronic Low Doses. Frontiers in Plant Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00847
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.