The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Mobile-Based Deep Learning Model for Cassava Disease Diagnosis
Open accessAbstract
Convolutional neural network (CNN) models have the potential to improve plant disease phenotyping where the standard approach is visual diagnostics requiring specialized training. In scenarios where a CNN is deployed on mobile devices, models are presented with new challenges due to lighting and orientation. It is essential for model assessment to be conducted in real world conditions if such models are to be reliably integrated with computer vision products for plant disease phenotyping. We train a CNN object detection model to identify foliar symptoms of diseases in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). We then deploy the model in a mobile app and test its performance on mobile images and video of 720 diseased leaflets in an agricultural field in Tanzania. Within each disease category we test two levels of severity of symptoms - mild and pronounced, to assess the model performance for early detection of symptoms. In both severities we see a decrease in performance for real world images and video as measured with the F-1 score. The F-1 score dropped by 32% for pronounced symptoms in real world images (the closest data to the training data) due to a decrease in model recall. If the potential of mobile CNN models are to be realized our data suggest it is crucial to consider tuning recall in order to achieve the desired performance in real world settings. In addition, the varied performance related to different input data (image or video) is an important consideration for design in real world applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision
Szegedy, C., Vanhoucke, V., Ioffe, S., Shlens, J., & Wojna, Z. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.308 · Cited by 32,138
(2016) · Cited by 31,590
He, K., Gkioxari, G., Dollar, P., & Girshick, R. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.322 · Cited by 29,137
Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
(1993) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.1993 · Cited by 17,667
Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks
Esteva, A., Kuprel, B., Novoa, R. A., Ko, J., Swetter, S. M., Blau, H. M., & Thrun, S. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21056 · Cited by 14,362
Using Deep Learning for Image-Based Plant Disease Detection
Mohanty, S. P., Hughes, D. P., & Salathé, M. (2016) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.01419 · Cited by 5,026
Self-citationA theory of learning from different domains
Ben-David, S., Blitzer, J., Crammer, K., Kulesza, A., Pereira, F., & Vaughan, J. W. (2010) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-009-5152-4 · Cited by 3,515
Deep learning for healthcare: review, opportunities and challenges
Miotto, R., Wang, F., Wang, S., Jiang, X., & Dudley, J. T. (2018) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbx044 · Cited by 3,076
Science, technology and the future of small autonomous drones
Floreano, D., & Wood, R. J. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14542 · Cited by 1,476
Cited by
Plant diseases and pests detection based on deep learning: a review
Liu, J., & Wang, X. (2021) · Plant Methods · doi:10.1186/s13007-021-00722-9 · Cited by 1,011
Gill, T., Gill, S. K., Saini, D. K., Chopra, Y., de Koff, J. P., & Sandhu, K. S. (2022) · Phenomics · doi:10.1007/s43657-022-00048-z · Cited by 322
Deep learning for predicting complex traits in spring wheat breeding program
Sandhu, K. S., Lozada, D. N., Zhang, Z., Pumphrey, M. O., & Carter, A. H. (2021) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.613325 · Cited by 147
Review: application of artificial intelligence in phenomics
Nabwire, S., Suh, H.-K., Kim, M. S., Baek, I., & Cho, B.-K. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21134363 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Ramcharan, A., McCloskey, P., Baranowski, K., Mbilinyi, N., Mrisho, L., Ndalahwa, M., Legg, J., & Hughes, D. P.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Plant Science
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2019-03-20
- Volume
- 10
- Pages
- 272-272
- ISSN
- 1664-462X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2923504698
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 20.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Mobile-Based Deep Learning Model for Cassava Disease Diagnosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fpls.2019.00272
- The paper
- Ramcharan, A., McCloskey, P., Baranowski, K., Mbilinyi, N., Mrisho, L., Ndalahwa, M., Legg, J., & Hughes, D. P. (2019). A Mobile-Based Deep Learning Model for Cassava Disease Diagnosis. Frontiers in Plant Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00272
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.