The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recognition and Localization Methods for Vision-Based Fruit Picking Robots: A Review
Open accessAbstract
The utilization of machine vision and its associated algorithms improves the efficiency, functionality, intelligence, and remote interactivity of harvesting robots in complex agricultural environments. Machine vision and its associated emerging technology promise huge potential in advanced agricultural applications. However, machine vision and its precise positioning still have many technical difficulties, making it difficult for most harvesting robots to achieve true commercial applications. This article reports the application and research progress of harvesting robots and vision technology in fruit picking. The potential applications of vision and quantitative methods of localization, target recognition, 3D reconstruction, and fault tolerance of complex agricultural environment are focused, and fault-tolerant technology designed for utilization with machine vision and robotic systems are also explored. The two main methods used in fruit recognition and localization are reviewed, including digital image processing technology and deep learning-based algorithms. The future challenges brought about by recognition and localization success rates are identified: target recognition in the presence of illumination changes and occlusion environments; target tracking in dynamic interference-laden environments, 3D target reconstruction, and fault tolerance of the vision system for agricultural robots. In the end, several open research problems specific to recognition and localization applications for fruit harvesting robots are mentioned, and the latest development and future development trends of machine vision are described.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The grand challenges of Science Robotics
Yang, G.-Z., Bellingham, J., Dupont, P. E., Fischer, P., Floridi, L., Full, R., Jacobstein, N., Kumar, V., McNutt, M., Merrifield, R., et al. (2018) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.aar7650 · Cited by 1,177
Cited by
Fu, L., Gao, F., Wu, J., Li, R., Karkee, M., & Zhang, Q. (2020) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2020.105687 · Cited by 331
Intelligent robots for fruit harvesting: recent developments and future challenges
Zhou, H., Wang, X., Au, W., Kang, H., & Chen, C. (2022) · Precision Agriculture · doi:10.1007/s11119-022-09913-3 · Cited by 316
Tang, Y., Zhou, H., Wang, H., & Zhang, Y. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118573 · Cited by 258
Self-citationA Generalization Performance Study Using Deep Learning Networks in Embedded Systems
Gorospe, J., Mulero, R., Arbelaitz, O., Muguerza, J., & Antón, M. Á. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21041031 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Tang, Y., Chen, M., Wang, C., Luo, L., Li, J., Lian, G., & Zou, X.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Plant Science
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2020-05-19
- Volume
- 11
- Pages
- 510-510
- ISSN
- 1664-462X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3026254524
- Cited by
- 575
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 43.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recognition and Localization Methods for Vision-Based Fruit Picking Robots: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fpls.2020.00510
- The paper
- Tang, Y., Chen, M., Wang, C., Luo, L., Li, J., Lian, G., & Zou, X. (2020). Recognition and Localization Methods for Vision-Based Fruit Picking Robots: A Review. Frontiers in Plant Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00510
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.