Cited by 125CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringGenetically Modified Organisms ResearchPlant Molecular Biology Research

Multiplex genome-editing technologies for revolutionizing plant biology and crop improvement

Open access
Abdelrahman, Mohamed, Wei, Zheng, Rohila, Jai S., Zhao, Kaijun·2021·Frontiers in Plant Science

Abstract

Multiplex genome-editing (MGE) technologies are recently developed versatile bioengineering tools for modifying two or more specific DNA loci in a genome with high precision. These genome-editing tools have greatly increased the feasibility of introducing desired changes at multiple nucleotide levels into a target genome. In particular, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein (Cas) [CRISPR/Cas] system-based MGE tools allow the simultaneous generation of direct mutations precisely at multiple loci in a gene or multiple genes. MGE is enhancing the field of plant molecular biology and providing capabilities for revolutionizing modern crop-breeding methods as it was virtually impossible to edit genomes so precisely at the single base-pair level with prior genome-editing tools, such as zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs) and transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs). Recently, researchers have not only started using MGE tools to advance genome-editing applications in certain plant science fields but also have attempted to decipher and answer basic questions related to plant biology. In this review, we discuss the current progress that has been made toward the development and utilization of MGE tools with an emphasis on the improvements in plant biology after the discovery of CRISPR/Cas9. Furthermore, the most recent advancements involving CRISPR/Cas applications for editing multiple loci or genes are described. Finally, insights into the strengths and importance of MGE technology in advancing crop-improvement programs are presented.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpls.2021.721203

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Climate change threatens global crop yield and food security due to rising temperatures, erratic rainfall, and increased abiotic stresses like drought, heat, and salinity.

    “Climate change threatens global crop yield and food security due to rising temperatures, erratic rainfall, and increased abiotic stresses like drought, heat, and salinity.”

    From Emerging applications of gene editing technologies for the development of climate-resilient crops (2025) · cites this paper as Abdelrahman et al., 2021

    The section “Enhancing Crop Resistance/Tolerance to Biotic/Abiotic Stress by MGE” (page unavailable) says abiotic stress threatens food security and crop production, becomes more prominent during global environmental changes, and includes drought, salinity, and extreme temperatures. It does not specifically mention erratic rainfall or a trend of rising temperatures. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 139 · Cited by 125

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Wang F. Zhang C. Xu W. Yuan S. Song J. Li L.. (2020). Developing high-efficiency base editors by combining optimized synergistic core components with new types of nuclear localization signal peptide. Crop J. 8, 408– 417. 10.1016/j.cj.2020.01.003e · DOI

Authors
Abdelrahman, M., Wei, Z., Rohila, J. S., & Zhao, K.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN)
  • United States Department of Agriculture (US)
Corresponding author
Zhao, Kaijun
Venue
Frontiers in Plant Science
Published
2021-10-06
Volume
12
Pages
721203-721203
ISSN
1664-462X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3203107720
Cited by
125
References
139
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 12
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Plant Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (U20A2035)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
Keywords
multiplex genome editing, CRISPR/Cas9, plant genome editing, crop improvement, zinc finger nucleases, TALEN, plant molecular biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review