The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding individual resilience in the workplace: the international collaboration of workforce resilience model
Open accessAbstract
When not managed effectively, high levels of workplace stress can lead to several negative personal and performance outcomes. Some professional groups work in highly stressful settings and are therefore particularly at risk of conditions such as anxiety, depression, secondary traumatic stress, and burnout. However, some individuals are less affected by workplace stress and the associated negative outcomes. Such individuals have been described as "resilient." A number of studies have found relationships between levels of individual resilience and specific negative outcomes such as burnout and compassion fatigue. However, because psychological resilience is a multi-dimensional construct it is necessary to more clearly delineate it from other related and overlapping constructs. The creation of a testable theoretical model of individual workforce resilience, which includes both stable traits (e.g., neuroticism) as well as more malleable intrapersonal factors (e.g., coping style), enables information to be derived that can eventually inform interventions aimed at enhancing individual resilience in the workplace. The purpose of this paper is to introduce a new theoretical model of individual workforce resilience that includes several intrapersonal constructs known to be central in the appraisal of and response to stressors and that also overlap with the construct of psychological resilience. We propose a model in which psychological resilience is hypothesized to mediate the relationship between neuroticism, mindfulness, self-efficacy, coping, and psychological adjustment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
Eysenck, H. J. (1985) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(85)90087-7 · Cited by 31,975
“Stress: appraisal and coping,”
Folkman, S. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_215 · Cited by 27,833
Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC)
Connor, K. M., & Davidson, J. R. T. (2003) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.10113 · Cited by 11,793
Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach.
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267 · Cited by 11,507
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1978) · Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0146-6402(78)90002-4 · Cited by 10,586
Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1991) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.100.3.316 · Cited by 4,601
Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis.
Stajković, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.124.2.240 · Cited by 3,782
A methodological review of resilience measurement scales
Windle, G., Bennett, K. M., & Noyes, J. (2011) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/1477-7525-9-8 · Cited by 2,079 · cited 4×
“Keywords: resilience, workplace, health professionals, burnout, professional, theoretical model, stress disorders, post-traumatic”
BackgroundInfluentialTemperament, personality, and the mood and anxiety disorders.
Clark, L. A., Watson, D., & Mineka, S. (1994) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.103.1.103 · Cited by 1,685
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Block, 1980, “The role of ego-control and ego-resiliency in the origination of behavior,â€, 39
- Melchert, 2011, Foundations of Professional Psychology: the End of Theoretical Orientations and the Emergence of the Biopsychosocial Approach, 10.1016/B978-0-12-385079-9.00006-0 · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-385079-9.00006-0
- Rutter, 1987, “Parental mental disorder as a psychiatric risk factor,â€, 647
- Stamm, 2010, The Concise ProQOL Manual
- Weick, 1999, “Organizing for high reliability: processes of collective mindfulness,â€, 23
Cited by
Bajaj, B., & Pande, N. (2016) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.09.005 · Cited by 422
Extent of compassion satisfaction, compassion fatigue and burnout in nursing: A meta-analysis
Zhang, Y.-Y., Han, W.-L., Qin, W., Yin, H.-X., Zhang, C.-F., Kong, C., & Wang, Y.-L. (2018) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1111/jonm.12589 · Cited by 339
Zhang, Y.-Y., Zhang, C., Han, X.-R., Li, W., & Wang, Y.-L. (2018) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000011086 · Cited by 267
Entrepreneurial resilience: a biographical analysis of successful entrepreneurs
Duchek, S. (2018) · International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal · doi:10.1007/s11365-017-0467-2 · Cited by 265
Work stress, perceived social support, self‐efficacy and burnout among Chinese registered nurses
Liu, Y., & Aungsuroch, Y. (2019) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1111/jonm.12828 · Cited by 197
Metadata
- Authors
- Rees, C. S., Breen, L. J., Cusack, L., & Hegney, D.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Psychology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2015-02-04
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- 73-73
- ISSN
- 1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1977908674
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 64
- FWCI
- 20.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding individual resilience in the workplace: the international collaboration of workforce resilience model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00073
- The paper
- Rees, C. S., Breen, L. J., Cusack, L., & Hegney, D. (2015). Understanding individual resilience in the workplace: the international collaboration of workforce resilience model. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00073
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.