Dream to Predict? REM Dreaming as Prospective Coding
Open accessAbstract
The dream as prediction seems inherently improbable. The bizarre occurrences in dreams never characterize everyday life. Dreams do not come true! But assuming that bizarreness negates expectations may rest on a misunderstanding of how the predictive brain works. In evolutionary terms, the ability to rapidly predict what sensory input implies-through expectations derived from discerning patterns in associated past experiences-would have enhanced fitness and survival. For example, food and water are essential for survival, associating past experiences (to identify location patterns) predicts where they can be found. Similarly, prediction may enable predator identification from what would have been only a fleeting and ambiguous stimulus-without prior expectations. To confront the many challenges associated with natural settings, visual perception is vital for humans (and most mammals) and often responses must be rapid. Predictive coding during wake may, therefore, be based on unconscious imagery so that visual perception is maintained and appropriate motor actions triggered quickly. Speed may also dictate the form of the imagery. Bizarreness, during REM dreaming, may result from a prospective code fusing phenomena with the same meaning-within a particular context. For example, if the context is possible predation, from the perspective of the prey two different predators can both mean the same (i.e., immediate danger) and require the same response (e.g., flight). Prospective coding may also prune redundancy from memories, to focus the image on the contextually-relevant elements only, thus, rendering the non-relevant phenomena indeterminate-another aspect of bizarreness. In sum, this paper offers an evolutionary take on REM dreaming as a form of prospective coding which identifies a probabilistic pattern in past events. This pattern is portrayed in an unconscious, associative, sensorimotor image which may support cognition in wake through being mobilized as a predictive code. A particular dream illustrates.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dreams are constructed from a combination of various isolated, sometimes non-obviously related episodic fragments.
“Instead, dreams are constructed from a combination of various isolated, sometimes non-obviously related episodic fragments [8-10].”
From How Adversarial REM Dreams May Facilitate Creativity, and Why We Become Aware of Them (2024) · cites this paper as [8]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 262 · Cited by 45
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Helmholtz H. V (1909). Physiological Optics. English translation 1962 by JPC Southall from the 3rd German edition of Handbuch der Physiologischen Optik. New York, NY: Vos, Hamburg; Dover.
- Llinás R. R. (2002). I of the Vortex: From Neurons to Self. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Schooler J. W. Melcher J. (1995). The Creative Cognitive Approach, in The Ineffability of Insight, eds Smith S. M. Ward T. B. Finke R. A. (Cambridge: MIT Press), 97– 133.
- Wilding J. Valentine E. (1997). Superior Memory: Essays in Cognitive Psychology. Hove: Psychology Press/Erlbaum.
- Authors
- Llewellyn, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Manchester (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Llewellyn, Sue
- ORCID
- Llewellyn, Sue
- Venue
- Frontiers in Psychology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2016-01-05
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- 1961-1961
- ISSN
- 1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4700581
- OpenAlex
- W2228646362
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 262
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 1.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Keywords
- predictive coding, dream bizarreness, visual perception, memory redundancy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review