Cited by 21Infant Development and Preterm CareNeonatal and fetal brain pathologyBirth, Development, and Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Learning Disabilities in Extremely Low Birth Weight Children and Neurodevelopmental Profiles at Preschool Age

Open access

Abstract

At school age extremely low birth weight (ELBW) and extremely low gestational age (ELGAN) children are more likely to show Learning Disabilities (LDs) and difficulties in emotional regulation. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of LDs at school age and to detect neurodevelopmental indicators of risk for LDs at preschool ages in a cohort of ELBW/ELGAN children with broadly average intelligence. All consecutively newborns 2001-2006 admitted to the same Institution entered the study. Inclusion criteria were BW < 1000 g and/or GA < 28 weeks. Exclusion criteria were severe cerebral injuries, neurosensory disabilities, genetic abnormalities, and/or a Developmental Quotient below normal limits (< 1 SD) at 6 years. The presence of learning disabilities at school age was investigated through a parent-report questionnaire at children's age range 9-10 years. Neurodevelopmental profiles were assessed through the Griffiths Mental Development Scales at 1 and 2 years of corrected age and at 3, 4, 5, and 6 years of chronological age and were analyzed comparing two groups of children: those with LDs and those without. At school age 24 on 102 (23.5%) of our ELBW/ELGAN children met criteria for LDs in one or more areas, with 70.8% comorbidity with emotional/attention difficulties. Children with LDs scored significantly lower in the Griffiths Locomotor and Language subscales at 2 years of corrected age and in the Personal-social, Performance and Practical Reasoning subscales at 5 years of chronological age. Our findings suggest that, among the early developmental indicators of adverse school outcome, there is a poor motor experimentation, language delay, and personal-social immaturity. Cognitive rigidity and poor ability to manage practical situations also affect academic attainment. Timely detection of these early indicators of risk is crucial to assist the transition to school.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00998

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neurodevelopmental delays such as cerebral palsy might not be visible in the first year of life.

    “It is important to emphasise that neuro-developmental delays such as cerebral palsy might not be visible in the first year of life, as observed by Squarza et al., who found in extremely low birth weight children an increased number of learning disabilities at school age.[23]”

    From Early neonatal mortality and neurological outcomes of neonatal resuscitation in a resource-limited setting on the Thailand-Myanmar border: A descriptive study (2018) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Conclusions report learning disabilities at school age among extremely low birth weight children, supporting that part of the citing sentence. The Results (Preschool outcomes) describe developmental assessments at one and later years, but the paper does not establish that cerebral palsy or other neurodevelopmental delays may be invisible during the first year. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 21

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Aarnoudse-Moens, 2009, Meta-analysis of neurobehavioral outcomes in very preterm and/or very low birth weight children, Pediatrics, 124, 717, 10.1371/journal.pone.0156064 · DOI
  2. Anderson, 2008, Cognitive and educational deficits in children born extremely preterm, Semin. Perinatol., 32, 51, 10.1053/j.semperi.2007.12.009 · DOI
  3. Anderson, 2004, Executive functioning in school-aged children who were born very preterm or with extremely low birth weight in the 1990s, Pediatrics, 114, 50, 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.12.036 · DOI
  4. Bell, 1978, Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis. Therapeutic decisions based upon clinical staging, Ann. Surg., 187, 1, 10.1097/00000658-197801000-00001 · DOI
  5. Bowen, 1996, Predictive value of the Griffiths assessment in extremely low birthweight infants, J. Paediatr. Child Health, 32, 25, 10.1111/j.1440-1754.1996.tb01536.x · DOI
  6. Committee for the Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity, 1984, An international classification of retinopathy of prematurity, Pediatrics, 74, 127, 10.1542/peds.74.1.127 · DOI
  7. de Vries, 1992, The spectrum of leukomalacia using cranial ultrasound, Behav. Brain Res., 49, 1, 10.1016/S0166-4328(05)80189-5 · DOI
  8. Doyle, 2011, Changing long-term outcomes for infants 500-999 g birth weight in Victoria, 1979-2005, Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., 96, F443, 10.1136/adc.2010.200576 · DOI
  9. Farooqi, 2013, Behaviours related to executive functions and learning skills at 11 years of age after extremely preterm birth: a Swedish national prospective follow-up study, Acta Paediatr, 102, 625, 10.1111/apa.12219 · DOI
  10. Feder, 2005, Handwriting performance in preterm children compared with term peers at age 6 to 7 years, Dev. Med. Child Neurol., 47, 163, 10.1017/S0012162205000307 · DOI
  11. Fenton, 2003, A new growth chart for preterm babies: Babson and Benda's chart updated with recent data and a new format, BMC Pediatr., 3, 13, 10.1186/1471-2431-3-13 · DOI
  12. Foulder-Hughes, 2003, Motor, cognitive, and behavioural disorders in children born very preterm, Dev. Med. Child Neurol., 45, 97, 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2003.tb00912.x · DOI
  13. Griffiths, 1996, The Griffiths Mental Development Scales-Revised Manual: From Birth to 2 Years.
  14. Grunau, 2002, Pattern of learning disabilities in children with extremely low birth weight and broadly average intelligence, Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med., 156, 615, 10.1001/archpedi.156.6.615 · DOI
  15. Jobe, 2001, Bronchopulmonary dysplasia, Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., 163, 1723, 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.04.001 · DOI
  16. Johnson, 2009, Academic attainment and special educational needs in extremely preterm children at 11 years of age: the EPICure study, Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., 94, F283, 10.1136/adc.2008.152793 · DOI
  17. Johnson, 2011, Educational outcomes in extremely preterm children: neuropsychological correlates and predictors of attainment, Dev. Neuropsychol., 36, 74, 10.1080/87565641.2011.540541 · DOI
  18. Latini, 2013, Survival rate and prevalence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in extremely low birth weight infants, Early Hum. Dev., 89, S69, 10.1016/S0378-3782(13)70020-3 · DOI
  19. Litt, 2012, Academic achievement of adolescents born with extremely low birth weight, Acta Paediatr., 101, 1240, 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2012.02790.x · DOI
  20. Lobo, 2013, Assessment and stability of early learning abilities in preterm and full-term infants across the first two years of life, Res. Dev. Disabil., 34, 1721, 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.02.010 · DOI
  21. Luiz, 2006, The Griffiths Mental Development Scales-Extended Revised: 2 to 8 Years Administration Manual.
  22. Marlow, 2005, Neurologic and developmental disability at six years of age after extremely preterm birth, N. Engl. J. Med., 352, 9, 10.1056/NEJMoa041367 · DOI
  23. MIUR, 2013, Alunni con Disturbi Specifici di Apprendimento. Direzione Generale per gli Studi, la Statistica e i Sistemi Informativi, Rilevazioni a.s., 2010
  24. Msall, 2012, Academic achievement after extreme prematurity: optimizing outcomes for vulnerable children in times of uncertainty, Acta Paediatr., 101, 1196, 10.1111/apa.12038 · DOI
  25. Mulder, 2009, Development of executive function and attention in preterm children: a systematic review, Dev. Neuropsychol., 34, 393, 10.1080/87565640902964524 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Murray, 2006, Infant motor development is associated with adult cognitive categorisation in a longitudinal birth cohort study, J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry, 47, 25, 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01450.x · DOI
  27. Orton, 2009, Do early intervention programmes improve cognitive and motor outcomes for preterm infants after discharge?, A systematic review. Dev. Med. Child Neurol., 51, 851, 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03414.x · DOI
  28. Papile, 1983, Relationship of cerebral intra-ventricular hemorrhage and early childhood neurologic handicaps, J. Pediatr., 103, 273, 10.1016/S0022-3476(83)80366-7 · DOI
  29. Pugliese, 2013, Preterm birth and developmental problems in infancy and preschool age Part II: cognitive, neuropsychological and behavioural outcomes, J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med., 26, 1653, 10.3109/14767058.2013.794205 · DOI
  30. Salt, 2006, Neurodevelopmental follow-up after preterm birth: follow up after two years, Early Hum. Dev., 82, 185, 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2005.12.015 · DOI
  31. Simms, 2013, Mathematics difficulties in children born very preterm: current research and future directions, A review. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., 98, F457, 10.1136/archdischild-2013-303777 · DOI
  32. Sutcliffe, 2010, Predictive value of developmental testing in the second year for cognitive development at five years of age, Pediatr. Rep., 2, 48, 10.4081/pr.2010.e15 · DOI
  33. Taylor, 2011, Learning problems in kindergarten students with extremely preterm birth, Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med., 165, 819, 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.137 · DOI
  34. Walle, 2014, Infant language development is related to the acquisition of walking, Dev. Psychol., 50, 336, 10.1037/a0033238 · DOI
  35. Wocadlo, 2006, Educational and therapeutic resource dependency at early school-age in children who were born very preterm, Early Hum. Dev., 82, 29, 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2005.06.005 · DOI
  36. World Health Organization, 2007, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: Children and Youth Version (ICF-CY).
  37. World Health Organization, 2010, International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision (ICD-10)

Metadata

Authors
Squarza, C., Picciolini, O., Gardon, L., Giannì, M. L., Murru, A., Gangi, S., Cortinovis, I., Milani, S., & Mosca, F.
Affiliations
University of Milan (IT)
Corresponding author
Squarza, Chiara
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2016-06-28
Volume
7
Pages
998-998
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2470589908
Cited by
21
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
Keywords
learning disabilities, extremely low birth weight, extremely low gestational age, neurodevelopmental risk, preschool children, language delay, motor development, personal and social development, Griffiths Mental Development Scales, transition to school

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review