Cited by 36Optimism, Hope, and Well-beingSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Efficacy of the Aussie Optimism Program: promoting pro-social behavior and preventing suicidality in primary school students. A randomised-controlled trial

Open access
Roberts, Clare M., Kane, Robert T., Rooney, Rosanna M., Pintabona, Yolanda, Baughman, Natalie, Hassan, Sharinaz, Cross, Donna, Zubrick, Stephen R. +1 more·2018·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

= 2288) from 63 government primary schools in Perth, Western Australia, participated in the pre, post, and follow-up study. Schools were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: Aussie Optimism with teacher training, Aussie Optimism with teacher training plus coaching, or a usual care condition that received the regular Western Australian Health Education Curriculum. Students in the Aussie Optimism conditions received 20, 1-h lessons relating to social and interpersonal skills and optimistic thinking skills over the last 2 years of primary school. Parents in the active conditions received a parent information booklet each year, plus a self-directed program in Grade 7. Students and parents completed the Extended Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Students who scored in the clinical range on the Emotional Symptoms Scale were given The Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents IV, to assess suicidal ideation and behavior, and depressive and anxiety disorders. Results indicated that Aussie Optimism with teacher training plus coaching was associated with the best outcomes: a significant increase in student-reported pro-social behavior from pre-test to post-test 1 (maintained at post-test 2) and significantly lower incidence rates from suicidal ideation at post-test 2 and follow-up. No significant intervention effects on anxiety and depressive disorders, and total difficulties were reported. These findings suggest that the AOP with teacher training along with coaching may have the potential to positively impact on suicidality and pro-social behavior in the pre-adolescent years.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01392

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nawaz 2023 provided only a narrative summary of the interventions and included two trials that were common to our review (Fukumori 2017; Roberts 2017).

    “The review authors provided only a narrative summary of the interventions and included two trials that were common to our review (Fukumori 2017; Roberts 2017).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 36

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Kendall P. (2006). Child and Adolescent Therapy. Cognitive-Behavioural Procedures 3rd Edn. New York, NY: Guildford Press.
  2. Pierangelo R. Giuliani G. (2008). Classroom Management Techniques for Students with ADHD: A Step-by-Step Guide for Educators. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  3. Zaslow M. Anderson R. Redd Z. Wessel J. Tarullo L. Burchinal M. (2010). Quality Dosage, Thresholds, and Features in Early Childhood Settings: A Review of the Literature. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services.

Authors
Roberts, C. M., Kane, R. T., Rooney, R. M., Pintabona, Y., Baughman, N., Hassan, S., Cross, D., Zubrick, S. R., & Silburn, S. R.
Affiliations
  • Curtin University (AU)
  • Edith Cowan University (AU)
  • The Kids Research Institute Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Kane, Robert T.
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2018-02-26
Volume
8
Pages
1392-1392
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2751323551
Cited by
36
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Australasian Journal of Paramedicine (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Australian Research Council (LPO347559)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
prosocial behavior, suicidal ideation, optimism, teacher professional development, coaching, elementary school students, late childhood, emotional symptoms, depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, school-based intervention, parental involvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review