CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 32

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Interactions: A Pragmatist View

Servais, Véronique·2018·Frontiers in Psychology
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02590PMC PMC6305360
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02590

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Airenti, 2012, Aux Origines de L’anthropomorphisme., 10.4000/gradhiva.2314 · DOI
  2. Arluke, 1988, Sacrificial symbolism in animal experimentation: object or pet?, Anthrozoös, 2, 98, 10.2752/089279389787058091 · DOI
  3. Bateson, 1963, “A social scientist views the emotions,” in, Expression of the Emotions in Man, 230
  4. Bateson, 1979, Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity.
  5. Bateson, The creature and its creations, A Sacred Unity: Further Steps to an Ecology of Mind, 265
  6. Bavidge, 2009, “Do animals need a theory of mind?” in, Against Theory of Mind, 167, 10.1057/9780230234383_9 · DOI
  7. Bird-David, 1999, “Animism” revisited. personhood, environment, and relational epistemology., Curr. Anthropol., 40, S67, 10.1086/200061 · DOI
  8. Buytendijk, 1952, Phénoménologie de la Rencontre.
  9. Costall, 1993, How Lloyd Morgan’s canon backfired., J. Hist. Behav. Sci., 29, 113, 10.1002/1520-6696(199304)29:2<113::AID-JHBS2300290203>3.0.CO;2-G · DOI
  10. Costall, 2007, “Review of “Thinking with animals: new perspectives on anthropomorphism,” in, Anthrozoös, 85, 10.2752/089279307780216678 · DOI
  11. Dewey, 1896, The reflex arc concept in psychology., Psychol. Rev., 3, 357, 10.1037/h0070405 · DOI
  12. Eddy, 1993, Attribution of cognitive states to animals: anthropomorphism in comparative perspective., J. Soc. Issues, 49, 87, 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb00910.x · DOI
  13. Epley, 2008, When we need a human: motivational determinants of anthropomorphism., Soc. Cogn., 26, 143, 10.1521/soco.2008.26.2.143 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Fisher, 1991, “Disambiguating anthropomorphism: an interdisciplinary study,” in, Perspectives in ethology, 49
  15. Fluvian, 2010, L’Animal et Son Statut. Approche Anthropologique de L’animal de Laboratoire. Mémoire de Fin D’études en Anthropologie non Publié.
  16. Gallagher, 2008, Direct perception in the intersubjective context., Conscious. Cogn., 17, 535, 10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.003 · DOI
  17. Gallup, 1997, “Anthropomorphism and the evolution of social intelligence: a comparative approach,” in, Anthropomorphism, Anecdotes, and Animals, 77
  18. Gibson, 1979, The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception., 127
  19. Goffman, 1974, Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience.
  20. Guthrie, 1997, “Anthropomorphism: a definition and a theory,” in, Anthropomorphism, Anecdotes, and Animals, 50
  21. Herzog, 1988, The moral status of mice., Am. Psychol., 43, 473, 10.1037/0003-066X.43.6.473 · DOI
  22. Herzog, 1997, “Common sense and the mental lives of animals: an empirical approach,” in, Anthropomorphism, Anecdotes, and Animals, 237
  23. Ingold, 2000, “Culture, nature, environment: steps to an ecology of life,” in, The Perception of the Environment. Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill, 13
  24. Ingold, 2001, “From the transmission of representation to the education of attention,” in, The Debated Mind: Evolutionary Psychology vs. Ethnography, 113
  25. Ingold, 2002, “Culture and the perception of the environment,” in, Bush Base, Forest Farm: Culture, Environment, and Development, 39
  26. Leudar, 2004, Theory of mind: a critical assessment., Theory Psychol., 14, 571, 10.1177/0959354304046173 · DOI
  27. Lynch, 1988, Sacrifice and the transformation of the animal body into a scientific object: laboratory culture and ritual practice in the neurosciences., Soc. Stud. Sci., 18, 265, 10.1177/030631288018002004 · DOI
  28. Mead, 1959, “The physical thing,” in, The Philosophy of the Present, 119
  29. Mead, 1936, Movements of Thought in the 19th Century
  30. Milton, 2002, Loving Nature. Towards an Ecology of Emotion.
  31. Mitchell, 1997, The interpretation of animal psychology: anthropomorphism or behavior reading?, Behaviour, 134, 173, 10.1163/156853997X00449 · DOI
  32. Morris, 2017, Direct perception of animal mind., Animal Sentience, 2, 10.51291/2377-7478.1236 · DOI
  33. Morris, 2000, Beyond anecdotes: an empirical study of “anthropomorphism”., Soc. Animals, 8, 151, 10.1163/156853000X00101 · DOI
  34. Noble, 1981, Gibsonian theory and the pragmatist perspective., J. Theory Soc. Behav., 11, 65, 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1981.tb00023.x · DOI
  35. Remme, 2016, “Chronically unstable ontology: ontological dynamics, radical alterity, and the “Otherwise within,” in, Critical Anthropological Engagements in Human Alterity and Difference, 113, 10.1007/978-3-319-40475-2_5 · DOI
  36. Rollin, 1990, “How the animals lost their minds: animal mentation and scientific ideology,” in, Interpretation and Explanation in the Study of Animal Behavior: Interpretation, Intentionality, and Communication, 375
  37. Servais, 2012, La visite au zoo et l’apprentissage de la distinction humaine., Revue d’anthropologie des connaissances, 6, 625, 10.3917/rac.017.0157 · DOI
  38. Silverman, 1997, “A pragmatic approach to the inference of animal mind,” in, Anthropomorphism, Anecdotes, and Animals, 170
  39. Wieder, 1980, Behavioristic operationalism and the life-world: chimpanzees and chimpanzee researchers in face-to-face interaction., Sociol. Inq., 50, 75, 10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00017.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 32

Metadata

Authors
Servais, V.
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Published
2018-12-18
Volume
9
ISSN
1664-1078
DOI
10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02590
PMC
PMC6305360
Cited by
32
References
0
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (unspecified)
Funders
Université de Liège

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Interactions: A Pragmatist View. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02590
The paper
Servais, V. (2018). Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Interactions: A Pragmatist View. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02590