Spiritually Motivated Self-Forgiveness and Divine Forgiveness, and Subsequent Health and Well-Being Among Middle-Aged Female Nurses: An Outcome-Wide Longitudinal Approach
Open accessAbstract
Background: Interest in the relationship between forgiveness and health is steadily growing across disciplines within the research community. While there are multiple forms of forgiveness, past research has focused principally on studying forgiveness of others, whereas longitudinal evidence on the associations between other forms of forgiveness and health remains scarce. Methods: Using longitudinal data from the Nurses’ Health Study II (from the 2008 Trauma Exposure and Post-traumatic Stress Supplementary Survey to 2015 questionnaire wave), this study employed an outcome-wide analytic approach to prospectively examine the association between two forms of religiously or spiritually motivated forgiveness, namely self-forgiveness and divine forgiveness, and a wide array of subsequent psychosocial well-being, mental health, health behavior, and physical health outcomes among middle-aged female nurses (N=54,703 for self-forgiveness; N=51,661 for divine forgiveness). All models controlled for sociodemographic factors, prior religious service attendance, and prior values of all outcome variables wherever data were available. Bonferroni correction was used to account for multiple testing. Results: Self-forgiveness was strongly associated with greater psychosocial well-being (e.g., for top versus bottom level of self-forgiveness, β=0.23, 95% CI: 0.20, 0.25 for positive affect) and lower psychological distress (e.g., β =-0.21, 95% CI: -0.23, -0.18 for depressive symptoms). To a lesser extent, divine forgiveness was also associated with higher levels of psychological well-being and lower psychological distress. For both forgiveness types, there was little evidence of association with physical health or health behavior outcomes, though possible marginal evidence for an association of self-forgiveness with increased mortality. Discussion: This study provides novel evidence that religiously or spiritually motivated self-forgiveness and divine forgiveness are both positively related to several indicators of psychosocial well-being and inversely associated with psychological distress outcomes, whereas the associations with physical health and health behaviors are less clear. Further longitudinal investigation of the dynamics between these types of forgiveness and health and well-being is warranted.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
One's understanding of God as benevolent or cruel is associated with mental health and help-seeking behaviors.
“Similarly, one’s understanding of God as benevolent or cruel is associated with mental health and help-seeking behaviors.40,41”
From Religiosity & mental health seeking behaviors among U.S. adults (2024) · cites this paper as [41]
The Discussion (Psychosocial Well-Being and Psychological Distress; page unavailable) associates perceived divine forgiveness with better psychological well-being, supporting the mental-health portion. But the paper says it could not assess personal beliefs about one's relationship to God; it does not establish an association for viewing God as benevolent versus cruel or for help-seeking behavior. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 67 · Cited by 33
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Konstan D. (2012). Before Forgiveness: The Origins Of A Moral Idea (Reprint edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Stump E. (2006). Love, by all accounts. Proc. Address. Am. Philos. Assoc. 80 25– 43.
- Worthington E. L. Wade N. G. (eds) (2020b). Handbook of Forgiveness, 2nd Edn Abingdon: Routledge.
- Authors
- Long, K. N. G., Chen, Y., Potts, M., Hanson, J., & VanderWeele, T. J.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Long, Katelyn N. G.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Psychology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2020-07-09
- Volume
- 11
- Pages
- 1337-1337
- ISSN
- 1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7363844
- OpenAlex
- W3040765088
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 3.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- John Templeton Foundation (61075)
- National Institutes of Health (U01 CA176726, R01 CA67262, CA222147)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
- Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Keywords
- self-forgiveness, divine forgiveness, religious motivation, spiritual well-being, psychosocial well-being, psychological distress, depressive symptoms, positive affect, health behavior, physical health, mortality, middle-aged women, female nurses, Nurses' Health Study II
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review