The attention training technique reduces anxiety and depression in patients with coronary heart disease: a pilot feasibility study
Open accessAbstract
Background and Objectives: Depression and anxiety symptoms are highly prevalent in coronary heart disease (CHD) patients and associated with poor outcome. Most psychological treatments have shown limited effectiveness on anxiety and depression in these patients. This study evaluates the feasibility of the attention training technique (ATT) in CHD patients with symptoms of anxiety and/or depression. Methods: Five consecutive CHD patients with significant depression and anxiety symptoms with Hospital Anxiety and Depression rating scale (HADS) -anxiety or -depression subscale score > 8 received 6 weekly group-sessions of ATT in an open trial. Outcomes included feasibility and symptoms measured by HADS, at baseline, post-treatment and at 6 months follow-up. We also assessed psychiatric diagnoses, type D personality, insomnia, worry, and rumination. Results: The sample comprised five men with a mean age of 59.9 (SD 4.4) years. Four of the patients attended all six sessions, and one patient attended all but one session. Mean HADS-A scores at baseline, post-treatment, and follow-up were 9.4 (SD 3.0), 4.2 (SD 3.0), and 4.0 (SD 2.5), and for HADS-D 8.6 (SD 3.3), 3.0 (SD 3.7), and 1.6 (SD 1.5), respectively. The results showed clinically significant changes in anxiety, depression, psychiatric disorders, insomnia, worry, and rumination. Statistically significant changes were found from pre- to post-treatment scores for HADS-A and worry, which were maintained at follow-up, and HADS-D scores significantly decreased from pre-treatment to 6-months follow-up. Conclusions: ATT in a group format appears to be a feasible stand-alone metacognitive treatment for CHD patients. An adequately powered randomized controlled trial is warranted.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dammen et al. demonstrated that ATT exercise leads to significant improvement in anxiety and depression symptoms.
“Dammen et al. (51) demonstrated that ATT exercise, which is also a part of our web app in particular leads to significant improvement in anxiety and depression symptoms.”
From Improving mental well-being in psychocardiology—a feasibility trial for a non-blended web application as a brief metacognitive-based intervention in cardiovascular disease patients (2023) · cites this paper as [51]
The Results report significantly reduced anxiety at the end of treatment and follow-up, and significantly reduced depression from pretreatment to follow-up. However, the Methods describe a five-patient open trial, and the Discussion calls the evidence preliminary; without a control group, it does not establish that ATT caused the improvements. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 8
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- First M. B. Spitzer R. L. Gibbon M. Williams J. B. W. (1997). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders–Patient Edition (SCID-IP. Version 2.0. 4. 97 Revision): Biometrics Research Department. New York, NY: New York State Psychiatric Institute.
- National Institute for Health Care Excellence (2009). Depression in Adults With a Chronic Physical Health Problem: Recognition and Management. NICE Guideline 91. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Retrieved from https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg91 39808015
- Authors
- Dammen, T., Tunheim, K., Munkhaugen, J., & Papageorgiou, C.
- Affiliations
- Oslo University Hospital (NO)
- University of Oslo (NO)
- Drammen Hospital (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Dammen, Toril
- Venue
- Frontiers in Psychology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2022-07-27
- Volume
- 13
- Pages
- 948081-948081
- ISSN
- 1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9363691
- OpenAlex
- W4288033687
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2023: 5
- FWCI
- 1.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Universitetet i Oslo
- Helse Sør-Øst RHF
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Keywords
- coronary artery disease, anxiety, depression, metacognitive therapy, group therapy, feasibility, worry, rumination, insomnia, Type D personality, psychiatric comorbidity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review