The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Integrating artificial intelligence to assess emotions in learning environments: a systematic literature review
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming multiple sectors within our society, including education. In this context, emotions play a fundamental role in the teaching-learning process given that they influence academic performance, motivation, information retention, and student well-being. Thus, the integration of AI in emotional assessment within educational environments offers several advantages that can transform how we understand and address the socio-emotional development of students. However, there remains a lack of comprehensive approach that systematizes advancements, challenges, and opportunities in this field. Aim: This systematic literature review aims to explore how artificial intelligence (AI) is used to evaluate emotions within educational settings. We provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of research, focusing on advancements, challenges, and opportunities in the domain of AI-driven emotional assessment within educational settings. Method: The review involved a search across the following academic databases: Pubmed, Web of Science, PsycINFO and Scopus. Forty-one articles were selected that meet the established inclusion criteria. These articles were analyzed to extract key insights related to the integration of AI and emotional assessment within educational environments. Results: The findings reveal a variety of AI-driven approaches that were developed to capture and analyze students’ emotional states during learning activities. The findings are summarized in four fundamental topics: (1) emotion recognition in education, (2) technology integration and learning outcomes, (3) special education and assistive technology, (4) affective computing. Among the key AI techniques employed are machine learning and facial recognition, which are used to assess emotions. These approaches demonstrate promising potential in enhancing pedagogical strategies and creating adaptive learning environments that cater to individual emotional needs. The review identified emerging factors that, while important, require further investigation to understand their relationships and implications fully. These elements could significantly enhance the use of AI in assessing emotions within educational settings. Specifically, we are referring to: (1) federated learning, (2) convolutional neural network (CNN), (3) recurrent neural network (RNN), (4) facial expression databases, and (5) ethics in the development of intelligent systems. Conclusion: This systematic literature review showcases the significance of AI in revolutionizing educational practices through emotion assessment. While advancements are evident, challenges related to accuracy, privacy, and cross-cultural validity were also identified. The synthesis of existing research highlights the need for further research into refining AI models for emotion recognition and emphasizes the importance of ethical considerations in implementing AI technologies within educational contexts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906 · Cited by 11,748
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0 · Cited by 7,242
Classroom emotional climate, student engagement, and academic achievement.
Reyes, M. R., Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., White, M., & Salovey, P. (2012) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0027268 · Cited by 1,229
Affective Computing and Sentiment Analysis
Cambria, E. (2016) · IEEE Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1109/mis.2016.31 · Cited by 1,204
Emotions Recognition Using EEG Signals: A Survey
Alarcao, S. M., & Fonseca, M. J. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2017.2714671 · Cited by 1,201
Achievement Emotions and Academic Performance: Longitudinal Models of Reciprocal Effects
Pekrun, R., Lichtenfeld, S., Marsh, H. W., Murayama, K., & Goetz, T. (2017) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12704 · Cited by 1,091
Machine learning in mental health: a scoping review of methods and applications
Shatte, A. B. R., Hutchinson, D. M., & Teague, S. J. (2019) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291719000151 · Cited by 1,047
Mega, C., Ronconi, L., & De Beni, R. (2014) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0033546 · Cited by 1,007
Artificial intelligence for mental health and mental illnesses: an overview
Graham, S., Depp, C., Lee, E. E., Nebeker, C., Tu, X., Kim, H.-C., & Jeste, D. V. (2019) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-019-1094-0 · Cited by 970
Why Peer Discussion Improves Student Performance on In-Class Concept Questions
Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., Adams, W. K., Wieman, C., Knight, J. K., Guild, N., & Su, T. T. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1165919 · Cited by 956
Cited by
Dumitru, C., Muttashar Abdulsahib, G., Ibrahim Khalaf, O., & Bennour, A. (2026) · Technology and Disability · doi:10.1177/10554181251355428 · Cited by 27
Yuan, Y., Fu, J., Leng, L., Wen, Z., Wei, X., Han, D., Hu, X., Liang, Y., Luo, Q., Zhang, X., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1672140 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Vistorte, A. O. R., Deroncele-Acosta, A., Ayala, J. L. M., Barrasa, A., López-Granero, C., & Martí-González, M.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Psychology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2024-06-19
- Volume
- 15
- Pages
- 1387089-1387089
- ISSN
- 1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4399857583
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 75
- FWCI
- 18.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integrating artificial intelligence to assess emotions in learning environments: a systematic literature review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1387089
- The paper
- Vistorte, A. O. R., Deroncele-Acosta, A., Ayala, J. L. M., Barrasa, A., López-Granero, C., & Martí-González, M. (2024). Integrating artificial intelligence to assess emotions in learning environments: a systematic literature review. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1387089
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.