Cited by 11Sport Psychology and PerformanceSports and Physical Education ResearchSports Performance and Training

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The benefits of guided imagery on athletic performance: a mixed-methods approach

Open access
Volgemute, Katrina, Vazne, Zermena, Malinauskas, Romualdas·2025·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Introduction: Imagery as a psychological skill in sports occupies an essential place in the psychological preparation of athletes and is one of the key factors in realizing an athlete’s potential in competitive sports. It’s role in athlete performance, as well as the differences in its use across various sports and demographic groups, has been a compelling topic in both sports’ science and psychology. This topic has remained relevant in recent years. Aim: This quantitative survey-based and experimental design study aims to first, to determine whether differences in imagery ability profiles, identified through cluster analysis, can characterize differences among athletes with varying levels of athletic achievement. A secondary aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of a guided imagery intervention on imagery abilities and athletic performance. Methods: A total of 500 athletes from different sports, aged M = 21.01 (SD = 2.82), both male and female, completed the Sport Imagery Ability Questionnaire (SIAQ) and provided information regarding their demographics and athletic achievements. In the experimental part of the study, nine alpine skiers were selected to participate in a six-month guided imagery intervention alongside their regular trainings on the ski track to assess the intervention’s impact on performance. Results: The results of K-means cluster analysis on athletic achievements of athletes showed a four-cluster solution that hat emphasized distinctions between the groups and reduced variation within each group. A Multiple Analysis of Covariance revealed that the four cluster groups differ in their imagery abilities. Pre- and post-intervention assessments for the nine alpine skiers were conducted using SIAQ and control training sessions, revealing significant increase in both imagery ability scores and performance indicators (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The research results support recent findings that athletes with higher athletic achievement tend to have stronger imagery abilities. The significant differences observed between the clusters based on athletic achievement levels were confirmed. By using imagery profiling of athletes with an analytical method, this study provides valuable insights into the role of imagery in athletic success, suggesting that tailored imagery training could enhance performance across different levels of athletic achievement.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1500194

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Research framework and hypotheses.
Figure 1 Research framework and hypotheses.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Imagery ability profiles for the four-cluster solution.
Figure 2 Imagery ability profiles for the four-cluster solution.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 The outcomes of the control training sessions. Negative values indicate a faster second run.
Figure 3 The outcomes of the control training sessions. Negative values indicate a faster second run.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Amasiatu, 2013, Mental imagery rehearsal as a psychological technique for enhancing sports performance, Mentalis, 1, 69
  2. Cumming, 2023, Imagery, 543
  3. Hartani, 2023, The impact of sport-specific imagery on skill acquisition and performance, Rev. Psicol. Deporte, 32, 29
  4. Volgemute, 2019, Sport imagery ability questionnaire adaptation, 812
  5. Welis, 2024, The influence of imagery training and self-confidence on shooting skills in futsal: a two-way ANOVA design, J. Phys. Educ. Sport, 24, 1767, 10.7752/jpes.2024.07197 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Volgemute, K., Vazne, Z., & Malinauskas, R.
Affiliations
Latvian Academy of Sport Education (LV)
Corresponding author
Volgemute, Katrina
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2025-04-11
Volume
16
Pages
1500194-1500194
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4409376882
Cited by
11
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5
FWCI
21.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Sports and Physical Education Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
guided imagery, mental imagery, athletic performance, athlete achievement, alpine skiing, sport psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review