Posttraumatic reactions to psychosis: a qualitative analysis.
Open accessAbstract
The current study aimed to evaluate the potentially traumatic aspects of psychotic symptoms and psychiatric treatment of psychosis using qualitative methods. Participants included 63 people with first episode psychosis or multiple psychotic episodes recruited from an inpatient psychiatric unit and an urban state psychiatric hospital in the North East region of the United States. Quasi-structured interviews were used to explore those aspects of symptoms and treatment that were perceived as traumatic Emotional reactions to the most traumatic aspect of symptoms and treatment, during and after the event, were also examined. Participants described a number of traumatogenic aspects of psychotic symptoms, including frightening hallucinations; suicidal thought/attempts, thoughts/attempts to hurt others; paranoia/delusions and bizarre/disorganized behavior or catatonia. Traumatic aspects of psychosis elicited emotions including anger, sadness and confusion, anxiety, and numbness at the time of event. Furthermore, many participants found aspects of treatment to be traumatic, including: being forced to stay in the hospital for a long time; experiencing upsetting side-effects; coercive treatments, including involuntary hospitalization, use of restraints, and forced medication; being exposed to aggressive patients; and mistreatment by professionals. These experiences elicited emotions of anger, sadness, distrust, and a sense of helplessness. Study findings suggest that the experiences both of psychotic symptoms and psychiatric treatment, potentially traumatic, can be a powerful barrier to engaging people in mental health services and facilitating recovery. Clinical implications were discussed.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Traumatic treatment experiences can damage patients' trust and hinder engagement with mental health services.
“Such traumatic treatment experiences can damage patients’ trust and hinder engagement with mental health services (16).”
From Making meaning of trauma in psychosis (2023) · cites this paper as [16]
Many narrators in the study described psychiatric admissions as traumatic.
“In correspondence with previous studies (15, 16, 31), many narrators in our study described psychiatric admissions as traumatic.”
From Making meaning of trauma in psychosis (2023) · cites this paper as [16]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 70 · Cited by 52
- Authors
- Lu, W., Mueser, K. T., Rosenberg, S. D., Yanos, P. T., & Mahmoud, N.
- Affiliations
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Boston University (US)
- Dartmouth College (US)
- John Jay College of Criminal Justice (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lu, Weili
- Venue
- Frontiers in Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2017-07-19
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- 129-129
- ISSN
- 1664-0640 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5515869
- OpenAlex
- W2738988212
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 2.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Frontiers in Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- CUNY Academic Works (City University of New York) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Keywords
- post-traumatic stress, psychosis, first-episode psychosis, psychiatric treatment, involuntary admission, involuntary treatment, restraint, antipsychotic adverse effects, hallucinations, paranoia, delusions, help-seeking barriers, mental health service engagement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review