Cited by 199COVID-19 and Mental HealthAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesStudent Stress and Coping

The Impact of Coping Strategies and Perceived Family Support on Depressive and Anxious Symptomatology During the Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19) Lockdown.

Open access
Mariani, Rachele, Renzi, Alessia, Di Trani, Michela, Trabucchi, Guido, Danskin, Kerri, Tambelli, Renata·2020·Frontiers in Psychiatry

Abstract

The coronavirus pandemic represents a severe global crisis, affecting physical and psychological health. Lockdown rules imposed to counteract the rapid growth of COVID-19, mainly social restrictions, have represented a risk factor for developing depressive and anxious symptoms. The research aims are to explore the effect of coping strategies and perceived social support on depressive and anxious symptomatology during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ninety-six healthy people (46 males, mean age = 39.3; SD = 16.6) completed through on-line platform: Socio-demographic questionnaire, Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS), Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) and Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R), three weeks after the imposition of lockdown restrictions. SCL-90-R Depression scores showed significant positive correlation with CISS Emotion (r = .85; p =.001) and Avoidant (r = .34; p = .018), a significant negative correlation with MSPSS Family support (r = -.43; p = .003). SCL-90-R Anxiety scores showed a significant positive correlation with CISS Emotion (r =.72; p = .001) and Avoidant (r = .35; p = .016). No significant correlations between both CISS Emotion and Avoidant scales with social support emerged. Two Multiple Linear Regression analysis were performed using respectively SCL-90-R Depression and Anxiety scores as dependent variables, and the CISS and MSPSS scales, age and gender as predictors. The first regression model (R2 = .78; adjusted R2 = .75) revealed CISS Emotion (β = .83; p = .001) and MSPSS Family support (β = -.24; p = .004) had a predictive effect on SCL-90-R Depression scores. The second regression model (R2 = .52; adjusted R2 = .472) revealed that only CISS Emotion (β = .71; p = .001) predicted the SCL-90-R Anxiety scores. In conclusion, during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns, coping focus on emotions seemed to increase anxious and depressive symptoms, probably due to the uncontrollable nature of the stressful event and the high emotional response. Family support which reduces the sense of loneliness had an exclusive role in mitigating depressive symptoms. These results highlight the importance of promoting psychological strategies to improve emotional regulation skills, reducing isolation from family, to prevent mood symptomatology in healthy citizens during large-scale health crises.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.587724

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 67 · Cited by 199

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [41]Gerhold L (2020). COVID-19: Risk perception and Coping strategies. Results from a survey in Germany. PsyArXiv [Preprint]. Available online at: https://psyarxiv.com/xmpk4/ (Accessed July 20:2020). 10.31234/osf.io/xmpk4 · DOI

Authors
Mariani, R., Renzi, A., Di Trani, M., Trabucchi, G., Danskin, K., & Tambelli, R.
Affiliations
Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Corresponding author
Mariani, Rachele
Venue
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Published
2020-11-13
Volume
11
Pages
587724-587724
ISSN
1664-0640 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3106207351
Cited by
199
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 1
FWCI
14.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
  • INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
Keywords
coping strategies, perceived family support, depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, COVID-19 lockdown, emotion-focused coping, avoidance coping, social support, loneliness, psychological distress, stress response, healthy adults, gender differences, age differences, Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations, Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, SCL-90-R, social restrictions, mental health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review