The Impact of Coping Strategies and Perceived Family Support on Depressive and Anxious Symptomatology During the Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19) Lockdown.
Open accessAbstract
The coronavirus pandemic represents a severe global crisis, affecting physical and psychological health. Lockdown rules imposed to counteract the rapid growth of COVID-19, mainly social restrictions, have represented a risk factor for developing depressive and anxious symptoms. The research aims are to explore the effect of coping strategies and perceived social support on depressive and anxious symptomatology during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ninety-six healthy people (46 males, mean age = 39.3; SD = 16.6) completed through on-line platform: Socio-demographic questionnaire, Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS), Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) and Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R), three weeks after the imposition of lockdown restrictions. SCL-90-R Depression scores showed significant positive correlation with CISS Emotion (r = .85; p =.001) and Avoidant (r = .34; p = .018), a significant negative correlation with MSPSS Family support (r = -.43; p = .003). SCL-90-R Anxiety scores showed a significant positive correlation with CISS Emotion (r =.72; p = .001) and Avoidant (r = .35; p = .016). No significant correlations between both CISS Emotion and Avoidant scales with social support emerged. Two Multiple Linear Regression analysis were performed using respectively SCL-90-R Depression and Anxiety scores as dependent variables, and the CISS and MSPSS scales, age and gender as predictors. The first regression model (R2 = .78; adjusted R2 = .75) revealed CISS Emotion (β = .83; p = .001) and MSPSS Family support (β = -.24; p = .004) had a predictive effect on SCL-90-R Depression scores. The second regression model (R2 = .52; adjusted R2 = .472) revealed that only CISS Emotion (β = .71; p = .001) predicted the SCL-90-R Anxiety scores. In conclusion, during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns, coping focus on emotions seemed to increase anxious and depressive symptoms, probably due to the uncontrollable nature of the stressful event and the high emotional response. Family support which reduces the sense of loneliness had an exclusive role in mitigating depressive symptoms. These results highlight the importance of promoting psychological strategies to improve emotional regulation skills, reducing isolation from family, to prevent mood symptomatology in healthy citizens during large-scale health crises.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Good social support reduces one's risk of anxiety and depression.
“good social support reduces one’s risk of anxiety and depression (41).”
From Sociodemographic characteristics, social support, and family history as factors of depression, anxiety, and stress among young adult senior high school students in metro Manila, Philippines, during the COVID-19 pandemic (2023) · cites this paper as [41]
The Results report that greater perceived family support was associated with lower depression scores during lockdown. The Discussion says the analysis did not demonstrate a relationship between perceived social support and anxiety. The study therefore does not support the claim that social support reduces the risk of both conditions, and its associations do not establish a reduction in risk. (LLM, conf=0.91)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredEmotion-focused coping strategies seemed to increase anxious and depressive symptoms.
“Emotion-focused coping strategies seemed to increase anxious and depressive symptoms (Mariani et al., 2020)”
From Dealing With the Pandemic of COVID-19 in Portugal: On the Important Role of Positivity, Experiential Avoidance, and Coping Strategies (2021) · cites this paper as Mariani et al., 2020
Studies concerning the most effective coping strategies to deal with the pandemic are variable depending on the context and the group studied.
“Besides, studies concerning the most effective coping strategies to deal with the pandemic are, as described previously, quite variable depending on the context and the group studied (e.g., Babore et al., 2020; Mariani et al., 2020; Rettie and Daniels, 2020; Jarego et al., 2021).”
From Dealing With the Pandemic of COVID-19 in Portugal: On the Important Role of Positivity, Experiential Avoidance, and Coping Strategies (2021) · cites this paper as Mariani et al., 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 67 · Cited by 199
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [41]Gerhold L (2020). COVID-19: Risk perception and Coping strategies. Results from a survey in Germany. PsyArXiv [Preprint]. Available online at: https://psyarxiv.com/xmpk4/ (Accessed July 20:2020). 10.31234/osf.io/xmpk4 · DOI
- Authors
- Mariani, R., Renzi, A., Di Trani, M., Trabucchi, G., Danskin, K., & Tambelli, R.
- Affiliations
- Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Mariani, Rachele
- Venue
- Frontiers in Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2020-11-13
- Volume
- 11
- Pages
- 587724-587724
- ISSN
- 1664-0640 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7691226
- OpenAlex
- W3106207351
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 14.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
- INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
- Keywords
- coping strategies, perceived family support, depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, COVID-19 lockdown, emotion-focused coping, avoidance coping, social support, loneliness, psychological distress, stress response, healthy adults, gender differences, age differences, Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations, Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, SCL-90-R, social restrictions, mental health
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review