The effectiveness of self-guided virtual-reality exposure therapy for public-speaking anxiety
Open accessAbstract
Objectives: Self-guided virtual-reality exposure therapy (VRET) is a psychological intervention that enables a person to increase their own exposure to perceived threat. Public-speaking anxiety (PSA) is an anxiety-provoking social situation that is characterized by fear of negative evaluation from an audience. This pilot study aimed to determine whether self-guided VRET (1) increases exposure to PSA-specific virtual social threats, and (2) reduces anxiety, arousal, heartrate and PSA over repeated exposure. Methods: Thirty-two University students (27 completers) with high self-reported public-speaking anxiety attended 2 weekly self-guided VRET sessions. Each session involved the participant delivering a 20-min speech in a virtual classroom. Participants were able to increase their exposure to virtual social threat through the audience size, audience reaction, number of speech prompts, and their own salience in the virtual classroom at 4-min intervals. Participants' heartrates and self-reported anxiety and arousal were monitored during these intervals. Participants completed psychometric assessments after each session and 1 month later. Results: Participants increased their exposure to virtual social threat during each VRET session, which coincided with a reduction in heartrate and self-reported anxiety and arousal. Improvement in PSA occurred post-treatment and 1 month later. The in-session improvement in anxiety correlated with reductions in fear of negative evaluation post-treatment and 1 month later. Conclusions: Increased self-exposure to virtual social threat from self-guided VRET relieves anxiety and shows immediate reductions in subjective and physiological arousal during application, but also yields sustained improvement in PSA.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Two weekly self-guided VRET sessions of a public speaking scenario in participants with high PSA resulted in a reduction of anxiety, fear of negative evaluation, and heart rate, with effects remaining for at least one month.
“In another study, participants with high PSA participated in two weekly self-guided VRET sessions of a public speaking scenario, which resulted in a reduction of anxiety, fear of negative evaluation, and heart rate, with effects remaining for at least one month (Premkumar et al., 2021).”
From Virtual Reality exposure therapy in the treatment of public speaking anxiety and social anxiety disorder (2024) · cites this paper as Premkumar et al., 2021
The Abstract and Discussion report two weekly self-guided sessions for participants with high public-speaking anxiety, with reduced anxiety and heart rate during the sessions and improved public-speaking anxiety at one month. The Results table also shows reduced fear of negative evaluation at one month. Heart rate was measured during the sessions, however, so the paper does not establish that its reduction remained for a month. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 78 · Cited by 57
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [10]Kaplan S Swee M Heimberg R. Psychological Treatments for Social Anxiety Disorder. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology. Available online at: https://oxfordre.com/psychology/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.001.0001/acrefore-9780190236557-e-98 (accessed June 8, 2021). · DOI
- [11]NICE. Social Anxiety Disorder: Recognition, Assessment and Treatment. Leicester: British Psychological Society (2013). 25577940
- Authors
- Premkumar, P., Heym, N., Brown, D. J., Battersby, S., Sumich, A., Huntington, B., Daly, R., & Zysk, E.
- Affiliations
- London South Bank University (GB)
- Nottingham Trent University (GB)
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Premkumar, Preethi
- Venue
- Frontiers in Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2021-08-19
- Volume
- 12
- Pages
- 694610-694610
- ISSN
- 1664-0640 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8416913
- OpenAlex
- W3195394027
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8
- FWCI
- 7.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (acceptedVersion)
- Research Open (London South Bank University) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Keywords
- public speaking anxiety, virtual reality exposure therapy, social anxiety, fear of negative evaluation, heart rate, speech delivery, sustained treatment effects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review