Impact of pesticide regulations on mortality from suicide by pesticide in China: an interrupted time series analysis
Open accessAbstract
Background: Pesticide bans and regulatory restrictions have been shown to be effective strategies for preventing suicide in several countries. Suicide and suicide by pesticides have decreased significantly in China over the past two decades. However, whether the reduction was associated with pesticide regulation is unknown. Methods: The monthly data on suicide and suicide by pesticide from 2006 to 2018 were obtained from China's Disease Surveillance Point (DSP) system. Information on China's pesticide regulations since 1970 was obtained from Pesticide Action Network International (PAN International), Joint Meeting on Pesticide Management Highly Hazardous Pesticides (JMPM HHP) lists, the website of the Ministry of Agriculture of China, Pesticide Information Network of China, and the Wan Fang database. Change point detection and policy analysis were combined to identify the time of any trend change breakpoint of suicide and suicide by pesticide. Interrupted time series analysis was used to investigate the pre- and post-breakpoint trends of monthly standardized rates in suicide and suicide by pesticide. Results: The standardized pesticide suicide rate decreased by 60.5% from 6.50 in 2006 to 2.56 per 100,000 in 2018. Larger declines were evident among people in urban areas (67.3%), female individuals (63.5%), and people aged 15–44 years (68.1%). The effect of policies banning highly hazardous organophosphorus pesticides (HHOP) [rate ratio (RR) = 0.993, 95% CIs (0.991–0.994)] in December 2008 and stopping domestic sales and use of paraquat aqueous solution (RR = 0.992, 95% CIs: 0.990–0.994) in July 2016 were more pronounced than regulating the paraquat-related products (RR = 1.003, 95% CIs: 1.002–1.004) in April 2012. Conclusion: Declines in suicide by pesticide in China occurred contemporaneously with regulatory bans and restrictions implemented on several pesticides, particularly in urban areas, among female individuals, and the relatively low age profile. These findings indicate the potential influence of these bans on trends of suicide by pesticides.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There were declines in self-harm in east Asia, particularly in China.
“There were, however, declines in self-harm in east Asia, particularly in China”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Liu, S., Wu, X., Lopez, A. D., Wang, L., Cai, Y., Page, A., Yin, P., Liu, Y., Li, Y., Liu, J., et al. (2016) · Bulletin of the World Health Organization · doi:10.2471/blt.15.153148 · Cited by 395 · see citing works
Self-citationGunnell, D., Knipe, D., Chang, S.-S., Pearson, M., Konradsen, F., Lee, W. J., & Eddleston, M. (2017) · The Lancet Global Health · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(17)30299-1 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Naghavi, M., Kyu, H. H., A, B., Aalipour, M. A., Aalruz, H., Ababneh, H. S., Abafita, B. J., Abaraogu, U. O., Abbafati, C., Abbasi, M., et al. (2025) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(25)01917-8 · Cited by 595 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Yan, Y., Jiang, Y., Liu, R., Eddleston, M., Tao, C., Page, A., Wang, L., Feng, G., & Liu, S.
- Affiliations
- Chinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention (CN)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (CN)
- Western Sydney University (AU)
- Capital Medical University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Feng, Guoshuang
- Liu, Shiwei
- ORCID
- Venue
- Frontiers in Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2023-09-04
- Volume
- 14
- Pages
- 1189923-1189923
- ISSN
- 1664-0640 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10507350
- OpenAlex
- W4386421317
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 4
- FWCI
- 5.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer Research
- Open Philanthropy Project
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
- University of Bristol
- Beihang University
- Capital Medical University
- Ministry of Agriculture of the People's Republic of China
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Agriculture and Farm Safety
- Keywords
- pesticide suicide, suicide mortality, pesticide regulation, pesticide ban, paraquat, suicide prevention policy, China, urban-rural differences, sex differences in suicide, young adults
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review