Effectiveness of Personalized Feedback Alone or Combined with Peer Support to Improve Physical Activity in Sedentary Older Malays with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Open accessAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Regular physical activity is an important aspect of self-management among older people with type 2 diabetes but many remain inactive. Interventions to improve physical activity levels have been studied but few studies have evaluated the effects of personalized feedback (PF) or peer support (PS); and there was no study on older people of Asian heritage. Hence, this trial evaluated whether PF only or combined with PS improves physical activity among older Malays with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) compared to usual care only. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A three-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted in a primary healthcare clinic in Malaysia. Sixty-nine sedentary Malays aged 60 years and older with T2DM who received usual diabetes care were randomized to PF or PS interventions or as controls for 12 weeks with follow-ups at weeks 24 and 36. Intervention groups performed unsupervised walking activity and received written feedback on physical activity. The PS group also received group and telephone contacts from trained peer mentors. The primary outcome was pedometer steps. Secondary outcomes were self-reported physical activity, cardiovascular risk factors, cardiorespiratory fitness, balance, quality of life, and psychosocial wellbeing. RESULTS: Fifty-two (75.4%) completed the 36-week study. The PS group showed greater daily pedometer readings than the PF and controls (p = 0.001). The PS group also had greater improvement in weekly duration (p < 0.001) and frequency (p < 0.001) of moderate intensity physical activity, scores on the Physical Activity Scale for Elderly (p = 0.003), 6-min walk test (p < 0.001), and social support from friends (p = 0.032) than PF and control groups. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that PF combined with PS in older Malays with T2DM improved their physical activity levels, cardiorespiratory fitness, and support from friends. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN71447000.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sazlina et al. demonstrated that combining peer support with personalized feedback enhanced participation in moderate-intensity exercise.
“Sazlina et al. further demonstrated that combining peer support with personalized feedback enhanced participation in moderate-intensity exercise [35].”
Studies that assessed body composition objectively sometimes detected meaningful fat-mass reductions even when BMI remained unchanged, particularly when advanced remote monitoring devices and personalized feedback or peer support were used.
“Interestingly, the handful of studies that assessed body composition objectively (e.g., percentage body fat) sometimes detected meaningful fat-mass reductions even when BMI remained unchanged, particularly when advanced remote monitoring devices and personalized feedback or peer support were used [32,35].”
In the absence of such structure, the device's ability to support sustained clinical improvement may be significantly reduced.
“In the absence of such structure, the device’s ability to support sustained clinical improvement may be significantly reduced [8,12,20,31,32,35].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 60 · Cited by 45
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [53]Leech NL Barrett KC Morgan GA Leech NL IBM SPSS for Intermediate Statistics: Use and Interpretation. New York, NY: Routledge (2011).
- Authors
- Sazlina, S.-G., Browning, C. J., & Yasin, S.
- Affiliations
- Institute of Gerontology, The University of Tokyo (JP)
- Monash University Malaysia (MY)
- Corresponding author
- Browning, Colette Joy
- Venue
- Frontiers in Public Health
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2015-07-13
- Volume
- 3
- Pages
- 178-178
- ISSN
- 2296-2565 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4500101
- OpenAlex
- W1572164282
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 1.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Frontiers in Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Greater South Information System
- Funders
- Monash University
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Keywords
- type 2 diabetes, physical activity, older adults, personalized feedback, peer support, peer mentoring, sedentary behavior, cardiorespiratory fitness, social support, Asian heritage
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review