Effects of urban green exercise on mental health: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
As global urbanization accelerates, concerns regarding the mental health of urban residents have become increasingly prominent. Urban green exercise, a non-pharmacological intervention integrating exposure to nature with physical activity, has gained considerable attention due to its potential mental health benefits. However, systematic evidence synthesizing the specific effects and underlying mechanisms of urban green exercise on mental health remains limited. Following strict adherence to PRISMA guidelines, systematic searches of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web Of Science identified 15 RCTs involving urban green spaces, comprising 980 participants aged 18 years and older. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool. Meta-analysis using standardized mean difference (SMD) was conducted using Stata 17.0, while subgroup and regression analyses were performed to explore moderating factors, including intervention period, frequency, duration per session, exercise intensity (METs), and gender. A moderate and statistically significant positive impact of urban green exercise on mental health was found (SMD = −0.40; 95% CI = −0.56 to −0.25; p < 0.001), with low between-study heterogeneity (I 2 = 33.9%). The most pronounced effects were associated with short-duration interventions (<12 weeks), interventions conducted at least three times weekly, session durations of 20 min or less, and low-to-moderate intensity (≤3 METs). Greater benefits were observed among female participants. This systematic review provides robust empirical support for the mental health benefits of urban green exercise in adult urban populations, highlighting the efficacy of short-duration, high-frequency, moderate-intensity intervention models. These findings offer evidence-based insights to inform urban public health policy and green space planning, emphasizing the need to enhance the accessibility and utilization of urban green spaces. Further high-quality RCTs with larger sample sizes are recommended to further validate long-term effects and elucidate underlying mechanisms.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.n71 · Cited by 108,283 · see citing works
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
Sterne, J. A. C., Savović, J., Page, M. J., Elbers, R. G., Blencowe, N. S., Boutron, I., Cates, C. J., Cheng, H.-Y., Corbett, M. S., Eldridge, S. M., et al. (2019) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.l4898 · Cited by 33,583 · see citing works
Barton, J., & Pretty, J. (2010) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es903183r · Cited by 1,592 · see citing works
Thompson Coon, J., Boddy, K., Stein, K., Whear, R., Barton, J., & Depledge, M. H. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es102947t · Cited by 1,391 · see citing works
The mental and physical health outcomes of green exercise
Pretty, J., Peacock, J., Sellens, M., & Griffin, M. (2005) · International Journal of Environmental Health Research · doi:10.1080/09603120500155963 · Cited by 1,128 · see citing works
Spending at least 120 minutes a week in nature is associated with good health and wellbeing
White, M. P., Alcock, I., Grellier, J., Wheeler, B. W., Hartig, T., Warber, S. L., Bone, A., Depledge, M. H., & Fleming, L. E. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-44097-3 · Cited by 1,125 · see citing works
Singh, B., Olds, T., Curtis, R., Dumuid, D., Virgara, R., Watson, A., Szeto, K., O'Connor, E., Ferguson, T., Eglitis, E., et al. (2023) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2022-106195 · Cited by 1,049 · cited 1× · see citing works
“” First, the initial phase of an intervention often elicits the greatest levels of participant enthusiasm and adherence, primarily driven by novelty and initial motivation (63, 64).”
Position statement on physical activity and exercise intensity terminology.
Norton, K., Norton, L., & Sadgrove, D. (2010) · Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport · doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2009.09.008 · Cited by 804 · see citing works
Jacobi, F., Höfler, M., Siegert, J., Mack, S., Gerschler, A., Scholl, L., Busch, M. A., Hapke, U., Maske, U., Seiffert, I., et al. (2014) · International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1002/mpr.1439 · Cited by 586 · see citing works
Mackay, G. J., & Neill, J. T. (2010) · Psychology of Sport and Exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2010.01.002 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of exercise on depression in adolescents
Wang, X., Cai, Z.-D., Jiang, W.-T., Fang, Y.-Y., Sun, W.-X., & Wang, X. (2022) · Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health · doi:10.1186/s13034-022-00453-2 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Creswell, C., Taylor, L., Giles, S., Howitt, S., Radley, L., Whitaker, E., Brooks, E., Knight, F., Raymont, V., Hill, C., et al. (2024) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(23)00429-7 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Enhancing the acute psychological benefits of green exercise: an investigation of expectancy effects
Flowers, E. P., Freeman, P., & Gladwell, V. F. (2018) · Psychology of Sport and Exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.08.014 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Hu, G., Luo, Q., Zhang, P., Zeng, H., & Ma, X.
- Affiliations
- Chengdu Sport University (CN)
- Beijing Normal University (CN)
- Tianjin University of Sport (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Ma, Xiujie
- ORCID
- Venue
- Frontiers in Public Health
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2025-09-25
- Volume
- 13
- Pages
- 1677223-1677223
- ISSN
- 2296-2565 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12507887
- OpenAlex
- W4414519709
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 2.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
- Chengdu University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Urban Green Space and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
- Keywords
- mental health, urban green space, nature exposure, physical activity, exercise intensity, intervention duration and frequency, sex differences, urbanization, green space planning, urban public health
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Urban Population, Exercise
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
