Automatic text classification of drug-induced liver injury using document-term matrix and XGBoost
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: Regulatory agencies generate a vast amount of textual data in the review process. For example, drug labeling serves as a valuable resource for regulatory agencies, such as U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Europe Medical Agency (EMA), to communicate drug safety and effectiveness information to healthcare professionals and patients. Drug labeling also serves as a resource for pharmacovigilance and drug safety research. Automated text classification would significantly improve the analysis of drug labeling documents and conserve reviewer resources. Methods: We utilized artificial intelligence in this study to classify drug-induced liver injury (DILI)-related content from drug labeling documents based on FDA’s DILIrank dataset. We employed text mining and XGBoost models and utilized the Preferred Terms of Medical queries for adverse event standards to simplify the elimination of common words and phrases while retaining medical standard terms for FDA and EMA drug label datasets. Then, we constructed a document term matrix using weights computed by Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF) for each included word/term/token. Results: The automatic text classification model exhibited robust performance in predicting DILI, achieving cross-validation AUC scores exceeding 0.90 for both drug labels from FDA and EMA and literature abstracts from the Critical Assessment of Massive Data Analysis (CAMDA). Discussion: Moreover, the text mining and XGBoost functions demonstrated in this study can be applied to other text processing and classification tasks.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AskFDALabel's DILI classification outperformed previous BERT- and keyword-based DILI classification results, even without training a predictive model.
“This result outperformed previous Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT)- and keyword-based DILI classification results, even without the needs of training a predictive model [19, 30].”
From Leveraging FDA Labeling Documents and Large Language Model to Enhance Annotation, Profiling, and Classification of Drug Adverse Events with AskFDALabel (2025) · cites this paper as [30]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 8
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Prokhorenkova L. Gusev G. Vorobev A. Dorogush A. V. Gulin A. (2018). “ CatBoost: unbiased boosting with categorical features” in Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 31.
- Authors
- Chen, M., Wu, Y., Wingerd, B., Liu, Z., Xu, J., Thakkar, S., Pedersen, T. J., Donnelly, T., Mann, N., Tong, W., Wolfinger, R. D., & Bao, W.
- Affiliations
- National Center for Toxicological Research (US)
- Boehringer Ingelheim (United States) (US)
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bao, Wenjun
- ORCID
- Venue
- Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2024-06-03
- Volume
- 7
- Pages
- 1401810-1401810
- ISSN
- 2624-8212 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11181907
- OpenAlex
- W4399302403
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4
- FWCI
- 1.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Text and Document Classification Technologies
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
- Keywords
- drug-induced liver injury, text classification, drug labeling, pharmacovigilance, adverse drug reactions, XGBoost, TF-IDF, term-document matrix, text mining
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review