Cited by 8Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug ReactionsText and Document Classification TechnologiesDrug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection

Automatic text classification of drug-induced liver injury using document-term matrix and XGBoost

Open access
Chen, Minjun, Wu, Yue, Wingerd, Byron, Liu, Zhichao, Xu, Joshua, Thakkar, Shraddha, Pedersen, Thomas J., Donnelly, Tom +4 more·2024·Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Introduction: Regulatory agencies generate a vast amount of textual data in the review process. For example, drug labeling serves as a valuable resource for regulatory agencies, such as U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Europe Medical Agency (EMA), to communicate drug safety and effectiveness information to healthcare professionals and patients. Drug labeling also serves as a resource for pharmacovigilance and drug safety research. Automated text classification would significantly improve the analysis of drug labeling documents and conserve reviewer resources. Methods: We utilized artificial intelligence in this study to classify drug-induced liver injury (DILI)-related content from drug labeling documents based on FDA’s DILIrank dataset. We employed text mining and XGBoost models and utilized the Preferred Terms of Medical queries for adverse event standards to simplify the elimination of common words and phrases while retaining medical standard terms for FDA and EMA drug label datasets. Then, we constructed a document term matrix using weights computed by Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF) for each included word/term/token. Results: The automatic text classification model exhibited robust performance in predicting DILI, achieving cross-validation AUC scores exceeding 0.90 for both drug labels from FDA and EMA and literature abstracts from the Critical Assessment of Massive Data Analysis (CAMDA). Discussion: Moreover, the text mining and XGBoost functions demonstrated in this study can be applied to other text processing and classification tasks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/frai.2024.1401810

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 8

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Prokhorenkova L. Gusev G. Vorobev A. Dorogush A. V. Gulin A. (2018). “ CatBoost: unbiased boosting with categorical features” in Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 31.

Authors
Chen, M., Wu, Y., Wingerd, B., Liu, Z., Xu, J., Thakkar, S., Pedersen, T. J., Donnelly, T., Mann, N., Tong, W., Wolfinger, R. D., & Bao, W.
Affiliations
  • National Center for Toxicological Research (US)
  • Boehringer Ingelheim (United States) (US)
  • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Bao, Wenjun
Venue
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
Published
2024-06-03
Volume
7
Pages
1401810-1401810
ISSN
2624-8212 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399302403
Cited by
8
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Text and Document Classification Technologies
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
Keywords
drug-induced liver injury, text classification, drug labeling, pharmacovigilance, adverse drug reactions, XGBoost, TF-IDF, term-document matrix, text mining

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review