Cited by 47Populism, Right-Wing MovementsGender, Feminism, and MediaGender and Feminist Studies

Gender, Populism, and the QAnon Conspiracy Movement

Open access
Bracewell, Lorna·2021·Frontiers in Sociology

Abstract

According to one recent review of the burgeoning interdisciplinary scholarly literature on populism, populism’s “relationship with gender issues remains largely understudied” ( Abi-Hassan, 2017 , 426–427). Of those scholarly treatments that do exist, the lion’s share focus on the role of men and masculinity in populist movements. In this essay, I argue scholarly reflection on the relationship of gender and populism should not be limited to this narrow frame. Through a close examination of the complex gender politics of QAnon, a pro-Trump conspiracy movement that burst into the mainstream of U.S. politics and culture with the onset of the global Coronavirus pandemic, I demonstrate that populist deployments of femininity are as rich, complex, and potent as their deployments of masculinity. QAnon, I argue, is a case study in how femininity, particularly feminine identities centered on motherhood and maternal duty, can be mobilized to engage women in populist political projects. Until scholars of populism start asking Cynthia Enloe’s famous question, “Where are the women?,” in a sustained and rigorous way, phenomena that are integral to populism’s functioning will elude us and our understanding of the relationship between gender and populism will remain partial and incomplete ( Enloe, 2014 ).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fsoc.2020.615727

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Abi-Hassan S. (2017). “ Populism and gender,” in The Oxford Handbook of populism Editors Kaltwasser C. R. Taggart P. Espejo P. O. Ostiguy P. (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press), 426– 444.
  2. Deckman M. (2016). Tea Party women: Mama Grizzlies, grassroots leaders, and the changing face of the American right New York: New York University Press.
  3. Kaltwasser C. R. Paul T. Ochoa Espejo P. Ostiguy P. (2017). Oxford Handbook of Populism Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  4. Kampwirth K. (2010). Gender and populism in Latin America: passionate politics (PA: University ParkPenn State University Press).
  5. Lo C. Y. H. (2012). Astroturf vs. grass roots: scenes from early tea party mobilization, in Steep: the precipitous Rise of the Tea Party Lawrence rosenthal and Christine Trost (Berkeley: University of California Press), 98– 129.
  6. Spierings N., Zaslove A., Mügge L. M. de Lange S. L. (2015). Gender and populist radical-right politics, Special Issue, Patterns Prejudice 49, 1– 2. 10.1080/0031322X.2015.1023642 · DOI
  7. Rousseau S. (2011). Indigenous and feminist movements at the Constituent Assembly in Bolivia: Locating the Representation of Indigenous Women. Lat. Am. Res. Rev 46 (2), 5– 28. 10.1353/lar.2011.0020 21744543 · DOI
  8. Schreiber R. (2016). Gender roles, motherhood, and politics: conservative women’s organizations frame Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachman. J. Women Polit. Pol 37 (1), 1– 23. 10.1080/1554477X.2016.1223444 · DOI
  9. Sparks H. (2014). Mama grizzlies and the guardians of the Republic: the Democratic and Intersectional politics of anger in the Tea party movement. New Polit. Sci 37 (1), 1– 23. 10.1080/07393148.2014.945252 · DOI

Authors
Bracewell, L.
Affiliations
Flagler College (US)
Corresponding author
Bracewell, Lorna
Venue
Frontiers in Sociology
Published
2021-01-21
Volume
5
Pages
615727-615727
ISSN
2297-7775 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3124424757
Cited by
47
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 5
FWCI
30.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Sociology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
QAnon, populism, gender, femininity, motherhood, maternal duties, Donald Trump, COVID-19 pandemic, masculinity, gender politics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review