Cited by 55Populism, Right-Wing MovementsGender, Feminism, and MediaGender and Feminist Studies

Shield Maidens, Fashy Femmes, and TradWives: Feminism, Patriarchy, and Right-Wing Populism

Open access
Love, Nancy S.·2020·Frontiers in Sociology

Abstract

Although media images typically present the alt right as a “manosphere,” white women continue to participate actively in white supremacist movements. Alt right women's presence as “shield maidens,” “fashy femmes,” and “trad wives” serves to soften and normalize white supremacy, often in ironic and insidious ways. In this essay, I examine the continued investment of white women in these traditional sex/gender roles espoused by the alt right. While feminism has done much to liberate women, I conclude that the images of women as Moms circulating in mainstream politics today suggest that white supremacy and white women's complicity in it has yet to be overcome.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fsoc.2020.619572

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Blee K. (1992). Women of the Klan: Racism and Gender in the 1920s. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  2. Blee K. (2003). Inside Organized Racism: Women in the Hate Movement. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  3. Dolgert S. (2016). The praise of ressentiment: or, how i learned to stop worrying and love donald trump. New Politi. Sci. 38, 354– 370. 10.1080/07393148.2016.1189030 · DOI
  4. Glymph T. (2008). Out of the House of Bondage: The Transformation of the Plantation Household. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Hancock A-M. (2016). Intersectionality: An Intellectual History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  6. Love N. S. (2016). White Power Music and the Future of Democracy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  7. Tronto J. (2020). Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York, NY: Routledge.

Authors
Love, N. S.
Affiliations
Appalachian State University (US)
Corresponding author
Love, Nancy S.
Venue
Frontiers in Sociology
Published
2020-12-23
Volume
5
Pages
619572-619572
ISSN
2297-7775 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3115363626
Cited by
55
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2
FWCI
13.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Sociology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
alt-right, white women, white supremacy, right-wing populism, patriarchy, feminism, gender roles, media representation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review