The DOI matches its Crossref record; 166 of the 166 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Ability of Conservation Agriculture to Conserve Soil Organic Carbon and the Subsequent Impact on Soil Physical, Chemical, and Biological Properties and Yield
Open accessAbstract
Increases in human populations and the emerging challenges of climate change mean that the world’s agricultural systems will need to produce more food in an environment that is increasingly variable and where the quality of our natural resource base is declining. One central measure of an agricultural system’s capacity to do this is its ability to preserve soil organic carbon (SOC), due to the pivotal role that this plays in maintaining soil physical, chemical and biological properties and ultimately yield. This narrative review examines the literature published worldwide over the last 30 years to assess the impact of one widely applied agricultural management system, conservation agriculture (CA), on its ability to maintain SOC and the subsequent impacts on soil physical, chemical and biological properties, and yield. While the effects of CA on SOC worldwide are variable, with both increases and decreases observed, in regions where soil and climatic conditions are favorable for biomass production and where the system does not negatively impact yield, then CA can lead to higher amounts of SOC relative to conventionally managed systems, particularly in the surface of the soil profile. Where greater SOC occurs, these are also often accompanied by improvements in soil structure, water infiltration and soil water storage, plant nutrient availability, microbial biomass and diversity, and yield. However, where CA is used in certain environments (e.g. cold, wet environments with poorly drained soils) or where the CA system has not been well adapted to local conditions, taking into account the specific agronomic, social and environmental challenges present, then it may not be a successful system of management. Farmers require access to a range of tools and resources to allow them to identify if the principles of CA are likely to lead be appropriate for their situation and well designed, locally adapted systems to successfully overcome the agronomic, social and economic challenges that can be associated with its use.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organic matter and water-stable aggregates in soils
TISDALL, J. M., & OADES, J. M. (1982) · Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.1982.tb01755.x · Cited by 6,267
Six, J., Elliott, E. T., & Paustian, K. (2000) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0038-0717(00)00179-6 · Cited by 3,397
Roy, W. R. (1995) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq1995.00472425002400010029x · Cited by 2,431
Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration Rates by Tillage and Crop Rotation: A Global Data Analysis
West, T. O., & Post, W. M. (2002) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2002.1930 · Cited by 2,215
Soil erosion and agricultural sustainability
Montgomery, D. R. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0611508104 · Cited by 2,186
Productivity limits and potentials of the principles of conservation agriculture
Pittelkow, C. M., Liang, X., Linquist, B. A., van Groenigen, K. J., Lee, J., Lundy, M. E., van Gestel, N., Six, J., Venterea, R. T., & van Kessel, C. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13809 · Cited by 1,688
Soil organic matter, biota and aggregation in temperate and tropical soils - Effects of no-tillage
Six, J., Feller, C., Denef, K., Ogle, S. M., de Moraes, J. C., & Albrecht, A. (2002) · Agronomie · doi:10.1051/agro:2002043 · Cited by 1,426
Effects of straw carbon input on carbon dynamics in agricultural soils: a meta‐analysis
Liu, C., Lu, M., Cui, J., Li, B., & Fang, C. (2014) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12517 · Cited by 1,168
Conservation agriculture and ecosystem services: An overview
Palm, C., Blanco-Canqui, H., DeClerck, F., Gatere, L., & Grace, P. (2014) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2013.10.010 · Cited by 969
The spread of Conservation Agriculture: justification, sustainability and uptake
Kassam, A., Friedrich, T., Shaxson, F., & Pretty, J. (2009) · International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability · doi:10.3763/ijas.2009.0477 · Cited by 866
Cited by
Conservation agriculture as a sustainable system for soil health: a review
Cárceles Rodríguez, B., Durán-Zuazo, V. H., Soriano Rodríguez, M., García-Tejero, I. F., Gálvez Ruiz, B., & Cuadros Tavira, S. (2022) · Soil Systems · doi:10.3390/soilsystems6040087 · Cited by 337
Sustainable farming practices and soil health: a pathway to achieving SDGs and future prospects
Sharma, P., Sharma, P., & Thakur, N. (2024) · Discover Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s43621-024-00447-4 · Cited by 128
Agroecology as agricultural practices for sustainable management in north African countries
Boutagayout, A., Belmalha, S., Rehali, M., Nassiri, L., & Bouiamrine, E. H. (2023) · International Journal of Plant Production · doi:10.1007/s42106-023-00251-6 · Cited by 14
Hart, J. P., Dotzel, K. M., & Winchell-Sweeney, S. (2026) · Journal of Field Archaeology · doi:10.1080/00934690.2025.2577501 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Page, K. L., Dang, Y. P., & Dalal, R. C.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2020-03-18
- Volume
- 4
- ISSN
- 2571-581X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3011592710
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 166
- FWCI
- 26.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Ability of Conservation Agriculture to Conserve Soil Organic Carbon and the Subsequent Impact on Soil Physical, Chemical, and Biological Properties and Yield. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00031
- The paper
- Page, K. L., Dang, Y. P., & Dalal, R. C. (2020). The Ability of Conservation Agriculture to Conserve Soil Organic Carbon and the Subsequent Impact on Soil Physical, Chemical, and Biological Properties and Yield. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.