Cited by 24Agricultural Science and FertilizationAgricultural Innovations and PracticesAgricultural economics and policies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fertilizer use efficiency and economic viability in maize production in the Savannah and transitional zones of Ghana

Open access

Abstract

Increasing fertilizer use is highly justified for sustainable agricultural intensification if yield response, fertilizer use efficiency (FUE), and economic viability of fertilizer application are high. Despite the increasing fertilizer application rates in Ghana, yields only marginally increased. Also, the recent fertilizer price hikes post COVID-19 revived concern for economic analysis of fertilizers. This study analyzed the FUE and economic viability of fertilizer use in maize production in Guinea/Sudan Savannah and Transitional/Deciduous zones of Ghana. Survey data from 2,673 farmers in the 2019, 2020, and 2021 production seasons were used. The average agronomic efficiency (AE), partial factor productivity (PFP), and value-cost ratio (VCR) of fertilizer use were 2.2 kg of grains per kilogram of fertilizer, 18.3 kg grains per kilogram of fertilizer, and 1.8 Ghana cedis of marginal yield per Ghana cedi spent on fertilizer, respectively. Fertilizer use was economically viable for only 28.1% of farmers with a VCR of 2 or higher, while 52.5% reached the break-even point with a VCR of at least 1. Various fertilizer formulations, including NPK plus sulfur, and adoption of integrated soil fertility management (ISFM) practices, particularly improved seeds, organic fertilizers, and minimum tillage, improved maize yield response to fertilizer and thus the FUE. These low efficiency and economic viability of fertilizer use are prevailing conditions in other sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) countries and these do not guarantee sustainable food security and improved livelihood of the farmers in the region. Ghana’s Ministry of Food and Agriculture (MoFA), together with relevant stakeholders, should provide guidance on ISFM and intensify farmer education through farmer associations to increase the adoption of ISFM. The local government should work with other relevant stakeholders to improve the market conditions within the agriculture sector, for instance, by linking farmers to city markets for favorable output prices.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fsufs.2024.1340927

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 52 references

1 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Adu, 2014, Recommended production practices for maize in Ghana
  2. Adzawla, Baseline study on fertilizer use and food/nutrition security in the Sudan Savannah, Guinea Savannah, and transitional zones of Ghana
  3. Dittoh, 2012, Improving the effectiveness, efficiency, and sustainability of fertilizer use in sub-Saharan Africa (policy research paper 3)
  4. 2022, Developments in global fertilizer markets
  5. Fixen, 2014, Nutrient/fertilizer use efficiency: measurement, current situation and trends, 1
  6. Jayne, 2015, Towards a sustainable soil fertility strategy in Ghana: a report submitted to the Ministry of Food and Agriculture of government of Ghana
  7. 2019, Planting for food and jobs campaign
  8. 2021, Facts and figures: agriculture in Ghana 2020
  9. Nhemachena, 2020, A rapid analysis of impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on selected food value chains in Africa
  10. Ragasa, 2014, Maize production in Ghana

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 24

Metadata

Authors
Adzawla, W., Setsoafia, E. D., Setsoafia, E. D., Amoabeng-Nimako, S., Atakora, W. K., Camara, O., Jemo, M., & Bindraban, P. S.
Affiliations
  • International Fertilizer Development Center (US)
  • Université Mohammed VI Polytechnique (MA)
Corresponding author
Adzawla, William
Venue
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Published
2024-02-19
Volume
8
ISSN
2571-581X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391928896
Cited by
19
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 1
FWCI
4.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Agricultural economics and policies
Keywords
fertilizer use efficiency, maize production, agronomic efficiency, partial factor productivity, value-cost ratio, integrated soil fertility management, improved varieties, organic fertilizer, reduced tillage, smallholder farmers, food security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review