Cited by 30Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAnimal health and immunologyEffects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock

Transport of young veal calves: effects of pre-transport diet, transport duration and type of vehicle on health, behavior, use of medicines, and slaughter characteristics

Open access
Marcato, Francesca, van den Brand, Henry, Kemp, Bas, Engel, Bas, Wolthuis-Fillerup, Maaike, van Reenen, Kees·2020·Frontiers in Veterinary Science

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate effects of different early life transport-related factors on health, behavior, use of medicines and slaughter characteristics of veal calves. An experiment was conducted with a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial arrangement with 3 factors: (1) provision of rearing milk or electrolytes before transport, (2) transport duration (6 or 18 h), and (3) type of vehicle (open truck or conditioned truck). The study included male Holstein-Friesian and cross-bred calves (N = 368; 18 ± 4 days; 45.3 ± 3.3 kg). Data on health status of calves were collected at the collection center and at the veal farm until week 27 post-transport. Behavior of calves was recorded during transport and at the veal farm until week 13 post-transport. Use of herd and individual medical treatments was recorded at the veal farm. The prevalence of loose or liquid manure at the veal farm from day 1 until week 3 post-transport was lower in electrolyte-fed calves transported in the conditioned truck compared to electrolytes-fed calves transported in the open truck or milk-fed calves transported in both the conditioned and open truck (Δ = 11% on average; P = 0.02). In comparison with the open truck, calves transported in the conditioned truck had lower prevalence of navel inflammation in the first 3 weeks post-transport (Δ = 3 %; P = 0.05). More milk-fed calves received individual antibiotic treatments compared to electrolyte-fed calves at the veal farm (P = 0.05). In conclusion, the transport-related factors examined in the present study affected health and behavior of calves in the short-term, but there was no evidence for long-term effects. It remains unknown why no long-term effects were found in this study. Perhaps this absence of transport-related effects was due to multiple use of medical treatments in the first weeks at the veal farm. Alternatively, it might be that the collective effects of the transition from the dairy farm to the veal farm, and of the husbandry conditions during the subsequent rearing period, on the adaptive capacity of calves were so large that effects of individual transport-related factors were overruled.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fvets.2020.576469

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These results reinforce conclusions drawn from previously published research data for calves transported over land for short and long durations, although these studies did not include a combination of ferry and lorry transport.

    “Regardless, these results reinforce conclusions drawn from previously published research data for calves transported over land for short and long durations (11, 16, 27), although these studies did not include a combination of ferry and lorry transport.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 30

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [33]Eicher S Morrow J Behavior following subcutaneous electrolyte treatment in transported calves. In: Ramos A Pinheiro Machado LC Hötzel MJ editors. Proceedings of the 34th International Congress of International Society of Applied Ethology (ISAE). Florianopolis: UFSC, Laboratory of Applied Ethology (2000). p. 76.

Authors
Marcato, F., van den Brand, H., Kemp, B., Engel, B., Wolthuis-Fillerup, M., & van Reenen, K.
Affiliations
Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Corresponding author
Marcato, Francesca
Venue
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Published
2020-12-18
Volume
7
Pages
576469-576469
ISSN
2297-1769 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3110808765
Cited by
30
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5
FWCI
3.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Veterinary Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal health and immunology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
Keywords
veal calves, animal transport, milk feeding, transport time, antibiotic use, calf health, calf behavior, slaughter traits, Holstein cows

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review