Cited by 277Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Dopamine, behavioral economics, and effort

Open access
Salamone, John D.·2009·Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

There are numerous problems with the hypothesis that brain dopamine (DA) systems, particularly in the nucleus accumbens, directly mediate the rewarding or primary motivational characteristics of natural stimuli such as food. Research and theory related to the functions of mesolimbic DA are undergoing a substantial conceptual restructuring, with the traditional emphasis on hedonia and primary reward yielding to other concepts and lines of inquiry. The present review is focused upon the involvement of nucleus accumbens DA in behavioral activation and effort-related processes. Viewed from the framework of behavioral economics, the effects of accumbens DA depletions and antagonism on food-reinforced behavior are highly dependent upon the work requirements of the instrumental task, and DA depleted rats are more sensitive to increases in response costs (i.e., ratio requirements). Moreover, interference with accumbens DA transmission exerts a powerful influence over effort-related choice behavior. Rats with accumbens DA depletions or antagonism reallocate their instrumental behavior away from food-reinforced tasks that have high response requirements, and instead these rats select a less-effortful type of food-seeking behavior. Nucleus accumbens DA and adenosine interact in the regulation of effort-related functions, and other brain structures (anterior cingulate cortex, amygdala, ventral pallidum) also are involved. Studies of the brain systems regulating effort-based processes may have implications for understanding drug abuse, as well as energy-related disorders such as psychomotor slowing, fatigue or anergia in depression and other neurological disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/neuro.08.013.2009

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent research in rodents points to a role for the nucleus accumbens in incorporating cost functions into decision making, mainly effort costs.

    “Recent research in rodents points to a role for the nucleus accumbens in incorporating cost functions into decision making, mainly in terms of effort costs (134).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 172 · Cited by 277

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Allison J. (1981). Economics and operant conditioning. In Predictability, Correlation and Contiguity, Harzem P. Zeiler M. D., eds (New York, John Wiley and Sons), pp 321– 353
  2. Salamone J. D. Farrar A. M. Font L. Patel V. Schlar D. E. Nunes E. J. Collins L. E. Sager T. N. (2009). Differential actions of adenosine A1 and A2A antagonists on the effort-related effects of dopamine D2 antagonism. Behav. Brain Res. 201, 216– 222 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.02.021 19428636 PMC2806666 · DOI

Authors
Salamone, J. D.
Affiliations
University of Connecticut (US)
Corresponding author
Salamone, John D.
Venue
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2009
Volume
3
Pages
13-13
ISSN
1662-5153 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088475596
Cited by
277
References
172
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 32
FWCI
12.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Repositori UJI (Universitat Jaume I) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Repository of Digital Objects for Teaching Research and Culture (University of Valencia) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH078023, R01MH078023)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
dopamine, nucleus accumbens, effort, behavioral economics, response cost, adenosine, mesolimbic dopamine system, drug abuse, depression, fatigue, anergia, job requirements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review