Cited by 118Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionSocial and Intergroup PsychologyFace Recognition and Perception

In-group and out-group membership mediates anterior cingulate activation to social exclusion

Open access
Krill, Austen·2009·Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience

Abstract

FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING WAS EMPLOYED TO EXAMINE SENSITIVITY TO SOCIAL EXCLUSION IN THREE CONDITIONS: same-race, other-race, and self-resembling faces. The anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), specifically the dorsal ACC, has been targeted as a key substrate in the physical and social pain matrix and was hypothesized to regulate activation response to various facial conditions. We show that participants demonstrated greatest ACC activation when being excluded by self-resembling and same-race faces, relative to other-race faces. Additionally, participants expressed greater distress and showed increased ACC activation as a result of exclusion in the same-race condition relative to the other-race condition. A positive correlation between implicit racial bias and activation in the amygdala was also evident. Implicit attitude about other-race faces partly explains levels of concern about exclusion by out-group individuals. These findings suggest that individuals are more distressed and their brain (i.e. neural alarm system) responds with greater activation when being excluded by individuals whom they are more likely to share group membership with.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/neuro.18.001.2009

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 118

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Williams K. (1997). Social ostracism. In Aversive Interpersonal Behaviors, Kowalski R. M. ed. (New York, Plenum), pp. 133– 170

Authors
Krill, A.
Affiliations
University of Liverpool (GB)
Corresponding author
Krill, Austen
Venue
Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience
Published
2009
Volume
1
Pages
1-1
ISSN
1663-070X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081105399
Cited by
118
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 12
FWCI
14.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Pioneer Fund
  • University of Liverpool
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
social exclusion, anterior cingulate cortex, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, in-group membership, other-race faces, implicit racial bias, amygdala, face recognition (cognition), social pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review