In-group and out-group membership mediates anterior cingulate activation to social exclusion
Open accessAbstract
FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING WAS EMPLOYED TO EXAMINE SENSITIVITY TO SOCIAL EXCLUSION IN THREE CONDITIONS: same-race, other-race, and self-resembling faces. The anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), specifically the dorsal ACC, has been targeted as a key substrate in the physical and social pain matrix and was hypothesized to regulate activation response to various facial conditions. We show that participants demonstrated greatest ACC activation when being excluded by self-resembling and same-race faces, relative to other-race faces. Additionally, participants expressed greater distress and showed increased ACC activation as a result of exclusion in the same-race condition relative to the other-race condition. A positive correlation between implicit racial bias and activation in the amygdala was also evident. Implicit attitude about other-race faces partly explains levels of concern about exclusion by out-group individuals. These findings suggest that individuals are more distressed and their brain (i.e. neural alarm system) responds with greater activation when being excluded by individuals whom they are more likely to share group membership with.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Extant fMRI research has induced feelings of rejection that may not be particularly intense.
“This fi nding is noteworthy because extant fMRI research has induced feelings of rejection that may not be particularly intense.”
From Social rejection shares somatosensory representations with physical pain (2011) · cites this paper as [11]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 118
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Williams K. (1997). Social ostracism. In Aversive Interpersonal Behaviors, Kowalski R. M. ed. (New York, Plenum), pp. 133– 170
- Authors
- Krill, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Liverpool (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Krill, Austen
- Venue
- Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- 1
- Pages
- 1-1
- ISSN
- 1663-070X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2704010
- OpenAlex
- W2081105399
- Cited by
- 118
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 14.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Pioneer Fund
- University of Liverpool
- Directorate for Biological Sciences
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Keywords
- social exclusion, anterior cingulate cortex, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, in-group membership, other-race faces, implicit racial bias, amygdala, face recognition (cognition), social pain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review