The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
COVID-19 Outbreak Prediction with Machine Learning
Open accessAbstract
Several outbreak prediction models for COVID-19 are being used by officials around the world to make informed decisions and enforce relevant control measures. Among the standard models for COVID-19 global pandemic prediction, simple epidemiological and statistical models have received more attention by authorities, and these models are popular in the media. Due to a high level of uncertainty and lack of essential data, standard models have shown low accuracy for long-term prediction. Although the literature includes several attempts to address this issue, the essential generalization and robustness abilities of existing models need to be improved. This paper presents a comparative analysis of machine learning and soft computing models to predict the COVID-19 outbreak as an alternative to susceptible–infected–recovered (SIR) and susceptible-exposed-infectious-removed (SEIR) models. Among a wide range of machine learning models investigated, two models showed promising results (i.e., multi-layered perceptron, MLP; and adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system, ANFIS). Based on the results reported here, and due to the highly complex nature of the COVID-19 outbreak and variation in its behavior across nations, this study suggests machine learning as an effective tool to model the outbreak. This paper provides an initial benchmarking to demonstrate the potential of machine learning for future research. This paper further suggests that a genuine novelty in outbreak prediction can be realized by integrating machine learning and SEIR models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking 1 1Edited by F. E. Cohen
Jones, G., Willett, P., Glen, R. C., Leach, A. R., & Taylor, R. (1997) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1996.0897 · Cited by 6,763
Ivanov, D. (2020) · Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2020.101922 · Cited by 2,280
Cited by
Machine learning: Algorithms, real-world applications and research directions
Sarker, I. H. (2021) · SN Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s42979-021-00592-x · Cited by 5,583
Golinelli, D., Boetto, E., Carullo, G., Nuzzolese, A. G., Landini, M. P., & Fantini, M. P. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/22280 · Cited by 574
ArunKumar, K. E., Kalaga, D. V., Mohan Sai Kumar, C., Kawaji, M., & Brenza, T. M. (2022) · Alexandria Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.aej.2022.01.011 · Cited by 287
Federated learning for COVID-19 screening from Chest X-ray images
Feki, I., Ammar, S., Kessentini, Y., & Muhammad, K. (2021) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107330 · Cited by 278
Applications of artificial intelligence in battling against covid-19: A literature review
Tayarani N., M.-H. (2021) · Chaos, Solitons & Fractals · doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110338 · Cited by 210
Metadata
- Authors
- Ardabili, S., Mosavi, A., Ghamisi, P., Ferdinand, F., Varkonyi-Koczy, A., Reuter, U., Rabczuk, T., & Atkinson, P.
- Venue
- Algorithms
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2020-10-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 249
- ISSN
- 1999-4893 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3016540417
- Cited by
- 427
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: COVID-19 Outbreak Prediction with Machine Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/a13100249
- The paper
- Ardabili, S., Mosavi, A., Ghamisi, P., Ferdinand, F., Varkonyi-Koczy, A., Reuter, U., Rabczuk, T., & Atkinson, P. (2020). COVID-19 Outbreak Prediction with Machine Learning. Algorithms. https://doi.org/10.3390/a13100249
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.