A Basic Study on the Absorption Properties and Their Prediction of Heterogeneous Micro-Perforated Panels: A Case Study of Micro-Perforated Panels with Heterogeneous Hole Size and Perforation Ratio
Open accessAbstract
Micro-perforated panels (MPPs) are one of the most promising alternatives to conventional porous sound-absorbing materials. Traditionally, the theory of the sound absorption properties of MPPs is based on the assumption that MPPs are a homogeneous material with identical pores at regular intervals. However, in recent years, some MPPs have not met these conditions, and although a variety of designs have been created, their properties and prediction methods were studied in only fewer works. In this paper, considering the wide variety of MPP designs, we made a trial production of heterogeneous MPPs, which are MPPs with holes of different diameters, and studied the prediction method applicable to these MPPs. We measured the normal incidence sound absorption characteristics of those MPPs, backed by a rigid backing and air-cavity in-between, in an impedance tube. The prediction method proposed in this work is to treat the heterogeneous MPPs as combinations of several homogeneous components, and to combine them after applying the existing theory on homogeneous MPPs to each component. As a result, except in a few cases, the measured and predicted values of the absorption properties agreed relatively well. We also found that the arrangement of the holes in the material and the depth of the back cavity affected the agreement between the measured and predicted results.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most current papers on acoustic panel development only cover analytical problem formulation or final design measurement in engineering reports.
“Most of the current papers on acoustic panel development only cover the analytical problem formulation [7,8] or the final design measurement in the engineering reports [9,10,11].”
From Sustainable Perforated Acoustic Wooden Panels Designed Using Third-Degree-of-Freedom Bezier Curves with Broadband Sound Absorption Coefficients (2023) · cites this paper as [9]
The Introduction (page unavailable) describes one prior study that compared analytical and numerical methods without reporting experimental results. It does not say that most acoustic-panel papers are limited to analytical formulation or final-design measurements in engineering reports. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- Maa, D.Y. Theory and design of microperforated panel sound-absorbing constructions. Sci. Sin. 1975, 17, 55-71.
- Maa, D.Y. Microperforated-panel wideband absorbers. Noise Control Eng. J. 1987, 29, 77-84. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Maa, D.Y. Potential of microperforated panel absorber. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1998, 104, 2861-2866. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Kang, J.; Fuchs, H.V. Predicting absorption of open weave textiles and micro-perforated membranes backed by an air space. J. Sound. Vib. 1999, 220, 905-920. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Fuchs, H.V.; Zha, X.; Zhou, X.; Drotleff, H. Creating low-noise environments in communication rooms. Appl. Acoust. 2001, 62, 1375-1396. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Zha, X.; Fuchs, H.V.; Drotleff, H. Improving the acoustic working conditions for musicians in small spaces. Appl. Acoust. 2002, 63, 203-221. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Herrin, D.; Liu, J.; Seybert, A. Properties and applications of microperforated panel. Sound Vib. 2011, 45, 6-9.
- Herrin, D. A guide to the applications of microperforated panel absorbers. Sound Vib. 2017, 51, 12-18.
- Guo, Y.; Allam, S.; Abom, M. Micro-perforated plates for vehicle applications. In Proceedings of the Inter-Noise 2008, Shanghai, China, 26-29 October 2008.
- Sakagami, K.; Nagayama, Y.; Morimoto, M.; Yairi, M. Pilot study on wideband sound absorber obtained by combination of two different microperforated panel (MPP) absorbers. Acoust. Sci. Technol. 2009, 30, 154-156. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Yairi, M.; Sakagami, K.; Takebayashi, K.; Morimoto, M. Excess sound absorption at normal incidence by two microperforated panel absorbers with different impedance. Acoust. Sci. Technol. 2011, 32, 194-200. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Mosa, A.I.; Putra, A.; Ramlan, R.; Esraa, A. Wideband sound absorption of a double-layer microperforated panel with in- homogeneous perforation. Appl. Acoust. 2020, 161, 107167. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Carbajo, J.; Ramis, l.; Godinho, L.; Amado-Mendes, P. Assessment of methods to study the acoustic properties of heterogene-ous perforated panel absorbers. Appl. Acoust. 2018, 133, 1-7. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Pan, L.; Martellotta, F. A parametric study of the acoustic performance of resonant absorbers made of micro-perforated membranes and perforated panels. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 1581. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Sakagami, K.; Kusaka, M.; Okuzono, T.; Nakanishi, S. The effect of deviation due to the manufacturing accuracy in the pa- rameters of an MPP on its acoustic properties: Trial production of MPPs of different hole shapes using 3D printing. Acoustics 2020, 2, 605-616. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Liu, Z.; Zhan, J.; Fard, M.; Davy, J.L. Acoustic properties of multilayer sound absorbers with a 3D printed micro-perforated panel. Appl. Acoust. 2017, 121, 25-32. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Boulvert, J.; Costa-Baptista, J.; Cavalier, T.; Perna, M.; Fosting, E.R.; Romero-Garcia, V.; Ross, A.; Mardjono, J.; Groby, J.-P. Acoustic modelling of micro-lattice obtained by additive manufacturing. Appl. Acoust. 2020, 164, 107244. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Nakanishi, S. Sound absorption of Helmholtz resonator included a winding built-in neck extension. In Proceedings of the Inter-Noise 2016, Hamburg, Germany, 21-24 August 2016.
- Sakagami, K.; Kusaka, M.; Okuzono, T.; Kido, S.; Yamaguchi, D. Application of Transparent Microperforated Panel to Acrylic Partitions for Desktop Use: A Case Study by Prototyping. 2021, 1. UCL Open: Environment Preprint. Available online: https://ucl.scienceopen.com/document?vid=42d011c5-c09b-41ac-a124-8c5a8803cc44 (accessed on 5 July 2021).
- Bolton, J.S.; Kim, N. Use of CFD to calculate the dynamic resistive end correction for microperforated materials with tapered holes. Acoust. Aust. 2010, 38, 134-144.
- Herdtle, T.; Bolton, J.S.; Kim, N.; Alexander, J.H.; Gardes, R.W. Transfer impedance of microperforated materials with tapered holes. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2013, 134, 4752-4762. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Okuzono, T.; Nitta, T.; Sakagami, K. Note on microperforated panel model using equivalent-fluid-based absorption elements. Acoust. Sci. Technol. 2019, 40, 221-224. [CrossRef · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chojnacki, B., Schynol, K., Halek, M., & Muniak, A. (2023) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma16186089 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kusaka, M., Sakagami, K., & Okuzono, T.
- Affiliations
- Kobe University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Sakagami, Kimihiro
- Venue
- Acoustics
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2021-07-05
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 473-484
- ISSN
- 2624-599X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3182992812
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Acoustics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Kobe University Repository Kernel (Kobe University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
- Keywords
- micro-perforated panels, sound absorption, sound absorption prediction, perforation rate, normal incidence, porous sound-absorbing materials, hole arrangement, impedance tube measurements
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review