Non-Cooperative Spacecraft Pose Estimation Based on Feature Point Distribution Selection Learning
Open accessAbstract
To address the limitations of inadequate real-time performance and robustness encountered in estimating the pose of non-cooperative spacecraft during on-orbit missions, a novel method of feature point distribution selection learning is proposed. This approach utilizes a non-coplanar key point selection network with uncertainty prediction, pioneering in its capability to accurately estimate the pose of non-cooperative spacecraft, thereby representing a significant advancement in the field. Initially, the feasibility of designing a non-coplanar key point selection network was analyzed based on the influence of sensor layout on the pose measurement. Subsequently, the key point selection network was designed and trained, leveraging images extracted from the spacecraft detection network. The network detected 11 pre-selected key points with distinctive features and was able to accurately predict their uncertainties and relative positional relationships. Upon selection of the key points exhibiting low uncertainty and non-coplanar relative positions, we utilized the EPnP algorithm to achieve accurate pose estimation of the target spacecraft. Our experimental evaluation on the SPEED dataset, which comes from the International Satellite Attitude Estimation Competition, validates the effectiveness of our key point selection network, significantly enhancing estimation accuracy and timeliness compared to other monocular spacecraft attitude estimation methods. This advancement provides robust technological support for spacecraft guidance, control, and proximity operations in orbital service missions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the case of the same number of keypoints, selecting non-coplanar points generally leads to higher accuracy of pose estimation.
“In the case of the same number of keypoints, selecting non-coplanar points generally leads to the higher accuracy of pose estimation [24].”
From Pose Estimation for Cross-Domain Non-Cooperative Spacecraft Based on Spatial-Aware Keypoints Regression (2024) · cites this paper as [24]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 15 · Cited by 9
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Kisantal, M.; Sharma, S.; Park, T.H.; Izzo, D.; Märtens, M.; D'Amico, S. Satellite Pose Estimation Challenge: Dataset, Competition Design, and Results. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 2020, 56, 4083-4098. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Lepetit, V.; Moreno-Noguer, F.; Fua, P. EPnP: An Accurate O(n) Solution to the PnP Problem. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2009, 81, 155-166.
- Experimental Evaluation of Pose Initialization Methods for Relative Navigation Between Non-Cooperative Satellites|IEEE Con- ference Publication|IEEE Xplore. Available online: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9856146 (accessed on 17 June 2024).
- Zhu, W.S.; Mou, J.Z.; Li, S.; Han, F. Advances in spacecraft attitude estimation based on deep learning. J. Astronaut. 2023, 44, 1633-1644.
- Huo Fast and Accurate Spacecraft Pose Estimation From Single Shot Space Imagery Using Box Reliability and Keypoints Existence Judgments-DOAJ. Available online: https://doaj.org/article/ff655c5ff2ee4ae38c601f93e0a5b832 (accessed on 4 March 2024).
- Chen, H.Y.; Wu, J.F.; Kang, G.H.; Wu, J.Q.; Li, X. A cooperative spacecraft position measurement method based on laser beacon and its accuracy analysis. J. Instrum. 2023, 44, 101-110. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Wang, G. Neural Network Based Position Measurement Method for Non-Cooperative Spacecraft. Master's Thesis, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China, 2022.
- Pan, J.; Ren, D.; Shi, Y.; Wang, L. Research on monocular position estimation algorithm based on improved YOLO6D. Sens. Microsyst. 2024, 43, 44-47+51. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Authors
- Yuan, H., Chen, H., Wu, J., & Kang, G.
- Affiliations
- Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (CN)
- Jiangsu Shuguang Opto-Electronics Co., Ltd., Taizhou 225532, China
- Corresponding author
- Wu, Junfeng
- Kang, Guohua
- Venue
- Aerospace
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2024-06-27
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 526
- ISSN
- 2226-4310 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4400079492
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 1.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Aerospace (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Jiangsu Province Entrepreneurship and Entrepreneurship Talent Project
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- non-cooperative spacecraft, spacecraft pose estimation, feature point distribution, uncertainty prediction, monocular vision, EPnP, spacecraft attitude determination, proximity operations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review