Fuel Efficiency Evaluation of A380 Aircraft through Comparative Analysis of Actual Flight Data of the A380–800 and A350–900
Open accessAbstract
The Airbus A380 was initially expected to replace existing aircraft due to its remarkable fuel efficiency on long-haul routes when operating with a full passenger load. However, recent changes in the commercial aviation environment have resulted in a decrease in demand for four-engine aircraft. Rising fuel prices have pushed airlines to focus on more efficient operations, while manufacturers prioritize producing advanced twin-engine aircraft. The debate over the long-term economic viability of A380 operations remains ongoing. This study compares and evaluates the fuel efficiency of the Airbus A380 and the Airbus A350 using actual flight data. The analysis employs a fuel efficiency prediction model to compare scenarios based on identical payload and load factor. Results indicate that the A350 is approximately twice as fuel efficient as the A380 under the same payload and about 1.34 times more efficient under the same load factor. The A380’s economic viability is analyzed by considering the balance between revenue per available ton-kilometer (RASK) and cost per available ton-kilometer (CASK). If the A380’s RASK is significantly higher than 1.34 times the A350’s or exceeds its own CASK, it can sustain operations. Achieving a balance between RASK and CASK is essential for the economic sustainability of A380 operations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Aerodynamic efficiency affects aircraft fuel consumption.
“Aerodynamic efficiency affects aircraft fuel consumption.”
From Introducing the comparative weighting evaluation based on the best criteria method: a multi-fuzzy framework for aviation fuel efficiency (2025) · cites this paper as [19]
A comparison of the A380 and the A350 revealed that the A350 is approximately twice as efficient under the same load condition.
“A comparison of the A380 and the A350 revealed that the A350 is approximately twice as efficient under the same load condition19.”
From Introducing the comparative weighting evaluation based on the best criteria method: a multi-fuzzy framework for aviation fuel efficiency (2025) · cites this paper as [19]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Eti, S., Karaman, F., Yüksel, S., Dinçer, H., & Yaylalı, İ. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-32988-7 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Jang et al. 19 compared the fuel efficiency of the Airbus A380 and A350, finding that the A350 is approximately twice as efficient with the same load, and that the economic sustainability of the A380 is directly related to the balance between revenue and cost.”
- Authors
- Jang, S., Yoon, S., & Yoo, J. L.
- Affiliations
- Asiana Airlines, Seoul City 07505, Republic of Korea
- Cheongju University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Jang, Sungwoo
- Yoo, Jae Leame
- Venue
- Aerospace
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2024-08-13
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 665
- ISSN
- 2226-4310 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4401540597
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3
- FWCI
- 0.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Aerospace (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Aviation Industry Analysis and Trends
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Air Traffic Management and Optimization
- Keywords
- Airbus A380, Airbus A350, fuel economy, twin-engine aircraft, four-engine aircraft, long-haul flights, load factor, flight data analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review