Cited by 13Plant tissue culture and regenerationFlowering Plant Growth and CultivationGrowth and nutrition in plants

Indirect Somatic Embryogenesis: An Efficient and Genetically Reliable Clonal Propagation System for Ananas comosus L. Merr. Hybrid “MD2”

Open access
Kessel-Domini, Argelys, Pérez-Brito, Daisy, Guzmán-Antonio, Adolfo, Barredo-Pool, Felipe A., Mijangos-Cortés, Javier O., Iglesias-Andreu, Lourdes Georgina, Cortés-Velázquez, Alberto, Canto-Flick, Adriana +3 more·2022·Agriculture

Abstract

The objective of this study was to establish an efficient—direct or indirect—regeneration system for pineapple (Ananas comosus L.) plants, with a high rate of multiplication and that would preserve the genetic identity of the donor genotype (Hybrid ‘MD2’) in the regenerated plants. Ten treatments, with different concentrations of 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic (2,4-D) and Picloram (P), in the absence or presence of 6-Benzylaminopurine (BAP), were used for in vitro morphogenesis induction, as well as histological and molecular techniques, in order to characterize the morphogenic responses induced. Significant differences between treatments tested, to induce callus and buds, were assessed by the Kruskal Wallis method and the Mann–Whitney U-tests. Different pineapple regeneration routes were identified, showing the high regeneration potential of this species. The medium containing 2 mg L−1 2,4-D and 2 mg L−1 BAP, where indirect somatic embryogenesis occurred, was selected as the most efficient treatment, with an average of 120 somatic embryos per explant, differing significantly from the rest of the treatments. It was also demonstrated that the pineapple plants regenerated in vitro preserved the genetic identity of the donor genotype, which represents a high degree of confidence for the application of indirect somatic embryogenesis for A. comusus clonal propagation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/agriculture12050713

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 29 · Cited by 13

Authors
Kessel-Domini, A., Pérez-Brito, D., Guzmán-Antonio, A., Barredo-Pool, F. A., Mijangos-Cortés, J. O., Iglesias-Andreu, L. G., Cortés-Velázquez, A., Canto-Flick, A., Avilés-Viñas, S. A., Rodríguez-Llanes, Y., & Santana-Buzzy, N.
Affiliations
  • Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, A.C (MX)
  • GeMBio, Grupo de Estudios Moleculares Aplicados a la Biología, Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán (CICY), Calle 43 No. 130, Chuburná de Hidalgo, Mérida 97205, Mexico
  • Unidad de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular de Plantas, Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán (CICY), Calle 43 No. 130, Chuburná de Hidalgo, Mérida 97205, Mexico
  • Universidad Veracruzana (MX)
Venue
Agriculture
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-05-18
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
713
ISSN
2077-0472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4280608482
Cited by
13
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Agriculture (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología de México (CONACYT) (PN/2016/3953)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Growth and nutrition in plants
Keywords
indirect somatic embryogenesis, pineapple, clonal propagation, plant regeneration, 2,4-D, picloram, benzyladenine, callus induction, somatic embryos, genetic fidelity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review