Indirect Somatic Embryogenesis: An Efficient and Genetically Reliable Clonal Propagation System for Ananas comosus L. Merr. Hybrid “MD2”
Open accessAbstract
The objective of this study was to establish an efficient—direct or indirect—regeneration system for pineapple (Ananas comosus L.) plants, with a high rate of multiplication and that would preserve the genetic identity of the donor genotype (Hybrid ‘MD2’) in the regenerated plants. Ten treatments, with different concentrations of 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic (2,4-D) and Picloram (P), in the absence or presence of 6-Benzylaminopurine (BAP), were used for in vitro morphogenesis induction, as well as histological and molecular techniques, in order to characterize the morphogenic responses induced. Significant differences between treatments tested, to induce callus and buds, were assessed by the Kruskal Wallis method and the Mann–Whitney U-tests. Different pineapple regeneration routes were identified, showing the high regeneration potential of this species. The medium containing 2 mg L−1 2,4-D and 2 mg L−1 BAP, where indirect somatic embryogenesis occurred, was selected as the most efficient treatment, with an average of 120 somatic embryos per explant, differing significantly from the rest of the treatments. It was also demonstrated that the pineapple plants regenerated in vitro preserved the genetic identity of the donor genotype, which represents a high degree of confidence for the application of indirect somatic embryogenesis for A. comusus clonal propagation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cryopreservation reduces maintenance time and costs and minimizes the accumulation of somaclonal variation or contamination risks over time.
“This technique reduces maintenance time and costs and minimizes the accumulation of somaclonal variation or contamination risks over time [166].”
From Somaclonal Variation and Clonal Fidelity in Commercial Micropropagation: Challenges and Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [166]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 29 · Cited by 13
- Authors
- Kessel-Domini, A., Pérez-Brito, D., Guzmán-Antonio, A., Barredo-Pool, F. A., Mijangos-Cortés, J. O., Iglesias-Andreu, L. G., Cortés-Velázquez, A., Canto-Flick, A., Avilés-Viñas, S. A., Rodríguez-Llanes, Y., & Santana-Buzzy, N.
- Affiliations
- Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, A.C (MX)
- GeMBio, Grupo de Estudios Moleculares Aplicados a la Biología, Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán (CICY), Calle 43 No. 130, Chuburná de Hidalgo, Mérida 97205, Mexico
- Unidad de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular de Plantas, Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán (CICY), Calle 43 No. 130, Chuburná de Hidalgo, Mérida 97205, Mexico
- Universidad Veracruzana (MX)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Agriculture
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2022-05-18
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 713
- ISSN
- 2077-0472 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4280608482
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5
- FWCI
- 0.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Agriculture (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología de México (CONACYT) (PN/2016/3953)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Growth and nutrition in plants
- Keywords
- indirect somatic embryogenesis, pineapple, clonal propagation, plant regeneration, 2,4-D, picloram, benzyladenine, callus induction, somatic embryos, genetic fidelity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review