Field-Relevant Soil Concentrations of Fluopyram: Effects on Cover Crop Establishment and Biomass, Root Architecture, Earthworms, Springtails, and Decomposition
Open accessAbstract
Fluopyram is a broad-spectrum fungicide and nematicide used in foliar sprays and seed treatments. Despite its low volatility and moderate solubility, it is frequently detected beyond application sites in air, soil, and water. As a per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS)-class “forever chemical”, its off-site presence raises ecotoxicological concerns. We conducted a 61-day greenhouse experiment to assess the effects of fluopyram residues in soil (0, 0.02, 0.04, and 0.78 mg kg−1 soil) on two cover crop species (Italian clover, Trifolium incarnatum; cornflower, Centaurea cyanus), earthworms (Lumbricus terrestris), springtails (Folsomia candida), and litter decomposition. Measured endpoints included plant establishment, growth, biomass, photosynthetic efficiency, root architecture, soil fauna activity, and litter breakdown. Responses were species-specific and did not exhibit clear dose–response relationships. Height growth in Italian clover and cornflower showed significant treatment × date interactions, whereas establishment and biomass production remained unaffected. In Italian clover, root diameter increased with fluopyram concentration, while root length and volume showed non-significant trends. Cornflower roots exhibited fewer crossings at higher concentrations but were otherwise unaffected. Photosynthetic efficiency remained unchanged in both species, although it tended to decrease modestly in cornflower at the highest concentration. Springtail surface activity density was generally influenced by fluopyram, with significant treatment × date interactions at 0.04 and 0.78 mg kg−1. Earthworm effects were inconclusive due to low survival rates. Neither litter decomposition rate nor stabilization factor was affected. Our results show that fluopyram residues in soil can induce subtle, species-specific effects in non-target organisms. However, long-term studies are needed to clarify how this highly persistent active ingredient and its degradation products accumulate in soils and interact with co-occurring pesticides, thereby improving ecological risk assessments.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40
- Authors
- Zottl, M., Lukas, M., Gruber, E., Patzwahl, W., Dreisiebner-Lanz, S., Brühl, C., & Zaller, J. G.
- Affiliations
- BOKU University (AT)
- B.T.W.—Büro für Technik und Management im Weinbau und Gartenbau, Segnitzer Straße 12, D-97320 Sulzfeld am Main, Germany
- Joanneum Research (AT)
- Rheinland-Pfälzische Technische Universität Kaiserslautern-Landau (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Zaller, Johann G.
- Venue
- Agrochemicals
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2026-08-28
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 38
- ISSN
- 2813-3145 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7204782282
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Agrochemicals (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
- Keywords
- fluopyram, cover crops, Trifolium incarnatum, Centaurea cyanus, earthworms, Lumbricus terrestris, Collembola, Folsomia candida, litter decomposition, root architecture, photosynthetic efficiency, non-target organisms, soil contamination, environmental risk assessment, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review