CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 9Plant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunityPowdery Mildew Fungal DiseasesInsect-Plant Interactions and Control

Plant Defence Induction by Meyerozyma guilliermondii in Vitis vinifera L.

Open access
Alonso de Robador, José María, Ortega Pérez, Nora, Sanchez-Ballesta, M. Teresa, Tello Mariscal, M. Luisa, Pintos López, Beatriz, Gómez-Garay, Arancha·2023·Agronomy
DOI 10.3390/agronomy13112780
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This article emphasizes the crucial importance of yeast Meyerozyma guilliermondii (Patent CECT13190) as a biological control agent (BCA) in eliciting defensive responses in vine plants, and is supported by comprehensive physiological, proteomic, and transcriptomic analyses. The results demonstrate that the BCA M. guilliermondii can induce enhanced defensive responses, as reflected in the regulation of key proteins. Notably, the upregulated expression of calmodulin and pathogenesis-related protein 10 (PR-10) are indicative of a complex interplay between calcium signalling, salicylic acid accumulation, and the elicitation of plant defence responses against pathogens. Furthermore, changes in microtubule dynamics and proteins related to protein synthesis and folding are observed, confirming the elicitation of defence responses. The correspondence between proteomic and transcriptomic analyses for genes codifying pathogenesis-related proteins, such as Vcgns1, VviTL1, and Vcchit1b, reinforces the empirical robustness of our findings. Collectively, our research explores the modulation of plant defences by the BCA, opening promising avenues for innovative agricultural strategies that enhance crop resilience and productivity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/agronomy13112780

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. Gramaje, 2011, Fungal trunk pathogens in the grapevine propagation process: Potential inoculum sources, Plant Dis., 95, 1040, 10.1094/PDIS-01-11-0025 · DOI
  2. Tello, 2019, First Report of Fusarium equiseti Causing Vascular Wilt Disease on Vitis vinifera in Spain, Plant Dis., 103, 2471, 10.1094/PDIS-01-19-0067-PDN · DOI
  3. Morsy, 2020, Improvement of growth and some metabolic activities in faba bean plants (Vicia faba L.) by using the yeast Meyerozyma guilliermondii in saline-sodic soil, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 27, 33872
  4. Yang, Q., Zhang, X., Solairaj, D., Fu, Y., and Zhang, H. (2023). Molecular Response of Meyerozyma guilliermondii to Patulin: Transcriptomic-Based Analysis. J. Fungi, 9. · DOI
  5. 2019, Application of powder formulation of Meyerozyma caribbica for postharvest control of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides in mango (Mangifera indica L.), LWT, 113, 108271, 10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108271 · DOI
  6. Arnold, 2003, Fungal endophytes limit pathogen damage in a tropical tree, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 15649, 10.1073/pnas.2533483100 · DOI
  7. Hoagland, 1950, The water-culture method for growing plants without soil, Circ. Calif. Agric. Exp. Stn., 347, 1
  8. Baggiolini, 1952, Sur la biologie de quelques champignons parasites de la vigne, Ann. L’institut Natl. Rech. Agron., 2, 1
  9. Sherman, 2022, DAVID: A web server for functional enrichment analysis and functional annotation of gene lists (2021 update), Nucleic Acids Res., 50, W216, 10.1093/nar/gkac194 · DOI
  10. Tseng, 2014, The effects of titania nanotubes with embedded TiO2 nanoparticles on the attachment and growth of keratinocytes and fibroblasts, Biomaterials, 35, 603
  11. Romero, 2016, Expression profiles and DNA-binding affinity of five ERF genes in bunches of Vitis vinifera cv. Cardinal treated with high levels of CO2 at low temperature, Front. Plant Sci., 7, 1748, 10.3389/fpls.2016.01748 · DOI
  12. Romero, 2019, WRKY transcription factors in the response of table grapes (cv. Autumn Royal) to high CO2 levels and low temperature, Postharvest Biol. Technol., 150, 42, 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2018.12.011 · DOI
  13. Livak, 2001, Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method, Methods, 25, 402, 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 · DOI · Paper page
  14. El-Morsy, E.S.M., Elmalahy, Y.S., and Mousa, M. (2023). Biocontrol of Fusarium equiseti using chitosan nanoparticles combined with Trichoderma longibrachiatum and Penicillium polonicum. Fungal Biol. Biotechnol., 10. · DOI
  15. Papon, 2013, Candida guilliermondii: Biotechnological applications, perspectives for biological control, emerging clinical importance and recent advances in genetics, Curr. Genet., 59, 73, 10.1007/s00294-013-0391-0 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Kthiri, Z., Jabeur, M.B., Chairi, F., López-Cristoffanini, C., López-Carbonell, M., Serret, M.D., Araus, J.L., Karmous, C., and Hamada, W. (2021). Exploring the potential of Meyerozyma guilliermondii on physiological performances and defense response against Fusarium crown rot on durum wheat. Pathogens, 10. · DOI
  17. Saleem, 2021, Salicylic acid: A key regulator of redox signalling and plant immunity, Plant Physiol. Biochem., 168, 381, 10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.10.011 · DOI
  18. 2005, Fungal pathogen-induced changes in the antioxidant systems of leaf peroxisomes from infected tomato plants, Planta, 222, 192, 10.1007/s00425-005-1514-8 · DOI
  19. Ankati, 2021, Streptomyces consortia-mediated plant defense against Fusarium wilt and plant growth-promotion in chickpea, Microb. Pathog., 157, 104961, 10.1016/j.micpath.2021.104961 · DOI
  20. Loake, 2007, Salicylic acid in plant defense—The players and protagonists, Curr. Opin. Plant Biol., 10, 466, 10.1016/j.pbi.2007.08.008 · DOI
  21. Edgar, 2006, Salicylic acid mediates resistance to the vascular wilt pathogen Fusarium oxysporum in the model host Arabidopsis thaliana, Australas. Plant Pathol., 35, 581, 10.1071/AP06060 · DOI
  22. Jacobsen, 2016, Integrated management of Fusarium crown rot of wheat using fungicide seed treatment, cultivar resistance, and induction of systemic acquired resistance (SAR), Biol. Control., 92, 153, 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2015.10.006 · DOI
  23. Lahlali, R., Ezrari, S., Radouane, N., Kenfaoui, J., Esmaeel, Q., El Hamss, H., Belabess, Z., and Barka, E.A. (2022). Biological control of plant pathogens: A global perspective. Microorganisms, 10. · DOI
  24. Patkar, R.N., and Naqvi, N.I. (2017). Fungal manipulation of hormone-regulated plant defense. PLoS Pathog., 13. · DOI
  25. Kim, 2008, Oxalic acid is an elicitor of plant programmed cell death during Sclerotinia sclerotiorum disease development, Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact., 21, 605, 10.1094/MPMI-21-5-0605 · DOI
  26. Melgarejo, 1991, Fungi in weathered sandstone from Salamanca cathedral, Spain, Sci. Total Environ., 107, 159, 10.1016/0048-9697(91)90257-F · DOI
  27. Munoz, 1994, Excretion of organic acids by fungal strains isolated from decayed sandstone, Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad., 34, 169, 10.1016/0964-8305(94)90006-X · DOI
  28. Pirovani, 2022, Pathogenesis-related protein 10 (PR-10) in resistance to biotic stress: Progress in elucidating functions, regulation, and modes of action, Front. Plant Sci., 14, 1193873
  29. Wanford, J.J., and Odendall, C. (2023). Ca2+-calmodulin signalling at the host-pathogen interface. Curr. Opin. Microbiol., 72. · DOI
  30. Berger, 2007, Plant physiology meets phytopathology: Plant primary metabolism and plant–pathogen interactions, J. Exp. Bot., 58, 4019, 10.1093/jxb/erm298 · DOI
  31. Raffeiner, 2023, Interplay between autophagy and proteasome during protein turnover, Trends Plant Sci., 28, 698, 10.1016/j.tplants.2023.01.013 · DOI
  32. Tyagi, 2022, Reactive oxygen species in plants: An invincible fulcrum for biotic stress mitigation, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 106, 5945
  33. Wang, J., Lian, N., Zhang, Y., Man, Y., Chen, L., Yang, H., Lin, J., and Jing, Y. (2022). The cytoskeleton in plant immunity: Dynamics, regulation, and function. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 23. · DOI
  34. Li, S., Cao, P., Wang, C., Guo, J., Zang, Y., Wu, K., Ran, F., Liu, L., Wang, D., and Min, Y. (2021). Genome-wide analysis of the tubulin gene family in cassava and expression of family member FtsZ2-1 during various stress. Plants, 10. · DOI
  35. Sazegari, 2020, Dynamic transcriptomic analysis uncovers key genes and mechanisms involved in seed priming-induced tolerance to drought in barley, Gene Rep., 21, 100941, 10.1016/j.genrep.2020.100941 · DOI
  36. Sahu, 2022, ROS generated from biotic stress: Effects on plants and alleviation by endophytic microbes, Front. Plant Sci., 13, 1042936, 10.3389/fpls.2022.1042936 · DOI
  37. Panina, 2007, Biocontrol and plant pathogenic Fusarium oxysporum-induced changes in phenolic compounds in tomato leaves and roots, J. Phytopathol., 155, 475, 10.1111/j.1439-0434.2007.01260.x · DOI
  38. 2007, Cell wall–associated mechanisms of disease resistance and susceptibility, Annu. Rev. Phytopathol., 45, 101, 10.1146/annurev.phyto.45.062806.094325 · DOI
  39. Marathe, 2003, Plant defense: One post, multiple guards?!, Mol. Cell, 11, 284, 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00072-8 · DOI
  40. Cobos, 2010, Cytoplasmic- and extracellular-proteome analysis of Diplodia seriata: A phytopathogenic fungus involved in grapevine decline, Proteome Sci., 8, 46, 10.1186/1477-5956-8-46 · DOI
  41. Yadav, 2022, A comprehensive analysis of calmodulin-like proteins of glycine max indicates their role in calcium signaling and plant defense against insect attack, Front. Plant Sci., 13, 817950, 10.3389/fpls.2022.817950 · DOI
  42. Leidhold, 2007, Chaperones and proteases—Guardians of protein integrity in eukaryotic organelles, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1113, 72, 10.1196/annals.1391.011 · DOI
  43. Yang, 2011, Proteomic analysis of grapevine stem in response to Xylella fastidiosa inoculation, Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol., 75, 90, 10.1016/j.pmpp.2010.11.002 · DOI
  44. Alvarez, 2022, Proline metabolism as a regulatory hub, Trends Plant Sci., 27, 39, 10.1016/j.tplants.2021.07.009 · DOI
  45. Sharma, 2023, Ubiquitination: A perspective from plant pathogens, J. Exp. Bot., 74, 4367, 10.1093/jxb/erad191 · DOI
  46. Morant, 2008, β-Glucosidases as detonators of plant chemical defense, Phytochemistry, 69, 1795, 10.1016/j.phytochem.2008.03.006 · DOI
  47. Madhupani, 2017, Delayed incidence of stem-end rot and enhanced defenses in Aureobasidium pullulans-treated avocado (Persea americana Mill.) fruit, J. Plant Dis. Prot., 124, 227, 10.1007/s41348-017-0086-8 · DOI
  48. de Jong, H., Reglinski, T., Elmer, P.A., Wurms, K., Vanneste, J.L., Guo, L.F., and Alavi, M. (2019). Integrated use of Aureobasidium pullulans strain CG163 and acibenzolar-S-methyl for management of bacterial canker in kiwifruit. Plants, 8. · DOI
  49. Vaghela, 2022, Plant chitinases and their role in plant defense: A comprehensive review, Enzym. Microb. Technol., 159, 110055, 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2022.110055 · DOI
  50. Vigers, 1992, Thaumatin-like pathogenesis-related proteins are antifungal, Plant Sci., 83, 155, 10.1016/0168-9452(92)90074-V · DOI
  51. Liu, 2010, The superfamily of thaumatin-like proteins: Its origin, evolution, and expression towards biological function, Plant Cell Rep., 29, 419, 10.1007/s00299-010-0826-8 · DOI
  52. Grenier, 1999, Some thaumatin-like proteins hydrolyze polymeric β-1, 3-glucans, Plant J., 19, 473, 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00551.x · DOI
  53. Rebaque, 2021, Cell wall-derived mixed-linked β-1, 3/1, 4-glucans trigger immune responses and disease resistance in plants, Plant J., 106, 601, 10.1111/tpj.15185 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alonso de Robador, J. M., Ortega Pérez, N., Sanchez-Ballesta, M. T., Tello Mariscal, M. L., Pintos López, B., & Gómez-Garay, A.
Affiliations
  • Research Group FiVe-A, Plant Physiology Unit, Genetic, Physiology and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
  • Department of Characterization, Quality and Safety, Institute of Food Science, Technology and Nutrition (ICTAN-CSIC), Ciudad Universitaria, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
  • INIA-CSIC, Ministry of Science and Innovation, Carretera de la Coruña Km 7.5, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
ORCID
Venue
Agronomy
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-11-08
Volume
13
Issue
11
Pages
2780
ISSN
2073-4395 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3390/agronomy13112780
OpenAlex
W4388533441
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 5
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Agronomy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA-CSIC), Madrid, Spain (RTA2015-0015-C02-02)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Powdery Mildew Fungal Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
Keywords
Candida guilliermondii, grapevine, biological control agents, elicitation, pathogenesis-related proteins, PR-10, calmodulin, calcium signaling, salicylic acid, microtubule dynamics, proteomics, transcriptomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review