Cited by 86Seed and Plant BiochemistryAgricultural Productivity and Crop ImprovementClimate change impacts on agriculture

Quinoa: In Perspective of Global Challenges

Open access
Jaikishun, Sirpaul, Li, Wenqiang, Yang, Zhenbiao, Song, Shikui·2019·Agronomy

Abstract

The global population is on the path of an increasing trajectory with a simultaneous decline in arable land resources through salinization and desertification that have resulted mainly from climate change and other anthropogenic activities. Rising temperatures will cause changes in the entire ecosystem, resulting in significant alterations in global climate paradigms and a threat to food security. This review focuses on how the highly resilient Chenopodium quinoa Willd. can sustainably mitigate some of the detrimental impacts, such as starvation, and support or provide ecosystem services. In comparison, compared with the traditional staple food crops, quinoa has remarkable tolerance to abiotic stresses and is highly nutritious, with a unique balance and higher amounts of nutrients, and can therefore be an important crop for food security and nutritional adequacy. This crop has the potential to ameliorate global challenges with respect to increase in global population, effects of climate change, desalinization, phytoremediation, satisfying nutrient deficiency, and alleviating poverty.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/agronomy9040176

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 91 · Cited by 86

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Jacobsen, S.; Mujica, A. The genetic resources of Andean grain amaranths (Amaranthus caudatus L., A. cruentus L. and A. hipochondriacus L.) in America. Plant Genet. Resour. Newsl. 2003, 133, 41-44.
  2. Lescano, R.J.L. Genetics and Improvement of High Andean Crops: Quinoa, Kañihua, Tarwi, Kiwicha, Bitter Potato, Olluco, Mashua and Oca Programa Interinstitucional de Waru Waru; CIMA: Cieneguilla, Peru, 1994; pp. 459-561.
  3. Tapia, M. La Quinua: Historia, Distribución Geográfica, Actual Producción y Usos. Ambienta: La Revista del Ministerio de Medio Ambiente 2012, 99, 104-119. Available online: http://www.revistaambienta.es/ WebAmbienta/marm/Dinamicas/secciones (accessed on 21 January 2019).
  4. Valencia-Chamorro, S. Quinoa. In Encyclopedia of Food Science and Nutrition; Caballero, B., Ed.; Academic Press: Amsterdam, The Nethelands, 2003; Volume 8, pp. 4895-4902.
  5. Christiansen, J.L.; Ruiz-Tapia, E.; Jørnsgård, B.; Jacobsen, S.-E. Fast Seed Germination of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) at Low Temperature. Alternative Crops for Sustainable Agriculture: Research Progress: COST 814, Workshop, Turku, 1999; 29/01/2019. Available online: https://research. ku.dk/search/?.../fast-seed-germination-of-quinoa (accessed on 29 January 2019).
  6. Canahua, A. Observaciones del comportamiento de la quinua a la sequía. In Primer Congreso Internacional Sobre Cultivos Andinos; Universidad Nacional San Cristobal de Huamanga, Instituto Interamericano de Ciencias Agricolas: Ayacucho, Peru, 1977; pp. 390-392.
  7. Siddiqu, S.; Krishnamoorthy, H. Effect of B-nine on the proline content of gram (Cicer arietinum) under saline conditions. Indian J. Plant Physiol. 1987, 1, 107-110.
  8. FAO/WHO/UNU. Energy and Protein Requirements: Report of a Joint FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation. WHO. Report No.: 9241207248. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3937340 (accessed on 19 December 2017).

Authors
Jaikishun, S., Li, W., Yang, Z., & Song, S.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Riverside (US)
  • Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Jaikishun, Sirpaul
  • Yang, Zhenbiao
Venue
Agronomy
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-04-05
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
176
ISSN
2073-4395 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2928468882
Cited by
86
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1
FWCI
7.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Agronomy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Seed and Plant Biochemistry
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Climate change impacts on agriculture
Keywords
quinoa, food security, climate change adaptation, abiotic stress tolerance, nutritional value, ecosystem services, desertification, salinization, phytoremediation, poverty reduction, population growth, arable land loss

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review