Cited by 24Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesPrimate Behavior and EcologyWildlife Ecology and Conservation

Utilizing camera traps, closed circuit cameras, and behavior observation software to monitor activity budgets, habitat use, and social interactions of zoo-housed Asian elephants (Elephas maximus)

Open access
Fazio, Jilian M., Barthel, Tony, Freeman, Elizabeth W., Garlick-Ott, Kay, Scholle, Anne, Brown, Janine L.·2020·Animals

Abstract

Accredited zoos and aquariums value superior animal husbandry and strive to ensure that the physical, psychological, and social needs of animals are met. In North America, the Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) relies on species-specific standards to ensure facilities provide the best care for collection animals. The AZA also makes explicit recommendations for long-term monitoring of welfare. Data collected through behavioral observations can be used to modify management as animals respond over time to social, environmental, or physical changes. In long-lived, social species like elephants, it is particularly important to document herd dynamics, calf development, geriatric health, and social bonds throughout their lifetimes. The Smithsonian's National Zoological Park housed one male and six female Asian elephants in dynamic social groupings. Behavioral observations were conducted on all elephants for two years using two methods involving ZooMonitor, closed circuit cameras, and camera traps. The goal was to compare how these two methods function to provide individual activity budgets, habitat use, and social interactions. Methodologies such as these, alone or in combination, have the potential to produce valuable data about potential changes in welfare over time in a zoological setting and can be performed either by staff or volunteers with high reliability.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ani10112026

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 24

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [27]Moss C. Portraits in the Wild University of Chicago Press Chicago, IL, USA 1982 371p
  2. [30]Martin P. Bateson P. Measuring Behaviour 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK 2007 1 176

Authors
Fazio, J. M., Barthel, T., Freeman, E. W., Garlick-Ott, K., Scholle, A., & Brown, J. L.
Affiliations
  • Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute (US)
  • National Zoological Park (US)
  • George Mason University (US)
Corresponding author
Fazio, Jilian M.
Venue
Animals
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-11-03
Volume
10
Issue
11
Pages
2026
ISSN
2076-2615 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3097694922
Cited by
24
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5
FWCI
2.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Animals (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
Asian elephant, zoo animal welfare, activity budget, habitat use, social interaction, herd dynamics, camera traps, behavioral observation, social grouping

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review