Utilizing camera traps, closed circuit cameras, and behavior observation software to monitor activity budgets, habitat use, and social interactions of zoo-housed Asian elephants (Elephas maximus)
Open accessAbstract
Accredited zoos and aquariums value superior animal husbandry and strive to ensure that the physical, psychological, and social needs of animals are met. In North America, the Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) relies on species-specific standards to ensure facilities provide the best care for collection animals. The AZA also makes explicit recommendations for long-term monitoring of welfare. Data collected through behavioral observations can be used to modify management as animals respond over time to social, environmental, or physical changes. In long-lived, social species like elephants, it is particularly important to document herd dynamics, calf development, geriatric health, and social bonds throughout their lifetimes. The Smithsonian's National Zoological Park housed one male and six female Asian elephants in dynamic social groupings. Behavioral observations were conducted on all elephants for two years using two methods involving ZooMonitor, closed circuit cameras, and camera traps. The goal was to compare how these two methods function to provide individual activity budgets, habitat use, and social interactions. Methodologies such as these, alone or in combination, have the potential to produce valuable data about potential changes in welfare over time in a zoological setting and can be performed either by staff or volunteers with high reliability.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The ethogram was developed using descriptions of social behaviors drawn from prior studies.
“An ethogram was developed using descriptions of social behaviors drawn from prior studies (Table 3) [3,23,40–42].”
From Socializing a group of male Asian elephants in a semi-captive facility in Lao PDR (2025) · cites this paper as [42]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 24
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [27]Moss C. Portraits in the Wild University of Chicago Press Chicago, IL, USA 1982 371p
- [30]Martin P. Bateson P. Measuring Behaviour 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK 2007 1 176
- Authors
- Fazio, J. M., Barthel, T., Freeman, E. W., Garlick-Ott, K., Scholle, A., & Brown, J. L.
- Affiliations
- Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute (US)
- National Zoological Park (US)
- George Mason University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fazio, Jilian M.
- Venue
- Animals
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2020-11-03
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2026
- ISSN
- 2076-2615 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7692367
- OpenAlex
- W3097694922
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5
- FWCI
- 2.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Animals (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Keywords
- Asian elephant, zoo animal welfare, activity budget, habitat use, social interaction, herd dynamics, camera traps, behavioral observation, social grouping
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review