Cited by 8Primate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Monitoring Behaviour in African Elephants during Introduction into a New Group: Differences between Related and Unrelated Animals

Open access
Hörner, Franziska, Oerke, Ann-Kathrin, Müller, Dennis W. H., Westerhüs, Uta, Azogu-Sepe, Idu, Hruby, Jiri, Preisfeld, Gela·2021·Animals

Abstract

The introduction of elephants into new groups is necessary for breeding programmes. However, behavioural studies on the reactions of these animals at first encounters are missing. In the present study, female African elephants (Loxodonta africana) living in zoos were observed during unifications with unfamiliar elephants (introduction of two to one females and one to two females; n = 6) and reunifications with related elephants (two mother–daughter-pairs; n = 4) that were separated for 2 and 12 years, respectively. First encounters of the elephants were observed and recorded by scan sampling. The parameters measured were (a) signs of the characteristic Greeting Ceremony, (b) distance to the fence separating the elephants during first contact, and (c) time until trunks touched for the first time. The data were statistically analysed with SPSS. The results showed that related elephants performed a full Greeting Ceremony on reunifications. Unrelated elephants only expressed a minor greeting. During first encounters, related elephants predominantly showed affiliative behaviour (p = 0.001), whilst unrelated elephants expressed more agonistic behaviour (p = 0.001). The distance to the fence was significantly smaller for related elephants than for unrelated elephants (p = 0.038). first contact of trunks occurred on average after 3.00 s. in related elephants and 1026.25 s. in unrelated elephants. These findings indicate that related elephants recognise their kin after up to 12 years of separation, meet them with a full Greeting Ceremony during reunification, and seek contact to the related elephant, while unrelated elephants are hesitant during unifications with unfamiliar elephants and express more agonistic behaviour. The results testify that zoo elephants show the same species-specific social behaviour as their conspecifics in the wild. It also confirms the cognitive abilities of elephants and the significance of matrilines for breeding programmes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ani11102990

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hörner et al. (2021) showed that two mother-daughter pairs of African elephants in captivity that were reunited after 2 and 12 years apart participated in greeting ceremonies, while unrelated elephants who were introduced to each other in the same setting showed only minor greeting behaviors.

    “Hörner et al. (2021) examined this in African elephants in captivity, and showed that two mother-daughter pairs that were reunited after 2 and 12 years apart participated in greeting ceremonies, while unrelated elephants who were introduced to each other in the same setting showed only minor greeting behaviors.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 49 · Cited by 8

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. [1]Archie E.A. Moss C.J. Alberts S.C. The ties that bind: Genetic relatedness predicts the fission and fusion of social groups in wild African elephants Proc. R. Soc. Biol. Sci. 2005 273 513 522 10.1098/rspb.2005.3361 16537121 PMC1560064 · DOI
  2. [2]Charif R.A. Ramey R.R. Langbauer W.R. Payne K.B. Martin R.B. Brown L.M. Spatial relationships and matrilineal kinship in African savanna elephant (Loxodonta africana) clans Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2005 57 327 338 10.1007/s00265-004-0867-5 · DOI
  3. [3]Estes R.D. The Behavior Guide to African Mammals: Including Hoofed Mammals, Carnivors, Primates The University of California Press Oxford, UK 1991
  4. [4]Langbauer W.R. Elephant communication Zoo Biol. Publ. Affil. Am. Zoo Aquar. Assoc. 2000 19 425 445 10.1002/1098-2361(2000)19:5<425::AID-ZOO11>3.0.CO;2-A · DOI
  5. [6]O’Connell-Rodwell C.E. Keeping an “ear” to the ground: Seismic communication in elephants Physiology 2007 22 287 294 10.1152/physiol.00008.2007 17699882 · DOI
  6. [8]Bates L.A. Sayialel K.N. Njiraini N.W. Poole J.H. Moss C.J. Byrne R.W. African elephants have expectations about the locations of out-of-sight family members Biol. Lett. 2008 4 34 36 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0529 18055407 PMC2412944 · DOI
  7. [10]Rasmussen L.E.L. Hall-Martin A.J. Hess D.L. Chemical profiles of male African elephants, Loxodonta africana: Physiological and ecological implications J. Mammal. 1996 77 422 439 10.2307/1382819 · DOI
  8. [12]Wheeler J.W. Rasmussen L.E.L. Ayorinde F. Buss I.O. Smuts G.L. Constituents of temporal gland secretion of the African elephant, Loxodonta africana J. Chem. Ecol. 1982 8 821 835 10.1007/BF00994782 24415180 · DOI
  9. [13]Langbauer W.R. Payne K.B. Charif R.A. Thomas E.M. Responses of captive African elephants to playback of low-frequency calls Can. J. Zool. 1989 67 2604 2607 10.1139/z89-368 · DOI
  10. [14]Langbauer W.R. Payne K.B. Charif R.A. Rapaport L. Osborn F. African elephants respond to distant playbacks of low-frequency conspecific calls J. Exp. Biol. 1991 157 35 46 10.1242/jeb.157.1.35 · DOI
  11. [18]Poole J. Payne K. Langbauer W.R. Moss C. The social contexts of some very low frequency calls of African elephants Behav. Ecol. Sociobiologv 1988 22 385 392 10.1007/BF00294975 · DOI · Paper page
  12. [19]Rasmussen L.E. Schulte B.A. Chemical signals in the reproduction of Asian (Elephas maximus) and African (Loxodonta africana) elephants Anim. Reprod. Sci. 1998 53 19 34 10.1016/S0378-4320(98)00124-9 9835364 · DOI
  13. [20]Andrews J. Mecklenborg A. Bercovitch F. Milk Intake and Development in a Newborn Captive African Elephant (Loxodonta africana) Zoo Biol. 2005 24 275 281 10.1002/zoo.20048 · DOI
  14. [21]Douglas-Hamilton I. On the ecology and behaviour of the African elephant Ph.D. Thesis University of Oxford Oxford, UK 1972
  15. [23]Lee P. Moss C. Early maternal investment in male and female elephant calves Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol 1986 18 353 361 10.1007/BF00299666 · DOI
  16. [24]Ortolani A. Leong K. Graham L. Savage A. Behavioral Indices of Estrus in a Group of Captive African Elephants (Loxodonta africana) Zoo Biol. Publ. Affil. Am. Zoo Aquar. Assoc. 2005 24 311 329 10.1002/zoo.20053 · DOI
  17. [25]Pinter-Wollman N. Isbell L.A. Hart L.A. The relationship between social behaviour and habitat familiarity in African elephants (Loxodonta Africana) Proc. R. Soc. B 2009 276 1009 1014 10.1098/rspb.2008.1538 PMC2679069 19129113 · DOI
  18. [27]Poole J. Behavioral Context of Elephant Acoustic Communication The Amboseli Elephnats: A Long-Term Perspective on a Long-Lived Mammal Moss C.J. Croze H. Lee P.C. The University of Chicago Press Chicago, IL, USA 2011 125 161
  19. [30]Poole J. Rutting behaviour in African elephants: The phenomenon of musth Behaviour 1987 102 283 316 10.1163/156853986X00171 · DOI
  20. [32]Bernier N.J. The corticotropin-releasing factor system as a mediator of the appetite-suppressing effects of stress in fish Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2006 146 45 55 10.1016/j.ygcen.2005.11.016 16410007 · DOI
  21. [34]Crockett C.M. Shimoji M. Bowden D.M. Behavior, appetite, and urinary cortisol responses by adult female pigtailed macaques to cage size, cage level, room change, and ketamine sedation Am. J. Primatol. 2000 52 63 80 10.1002/1098-2345(200010)52:2<63::AID-AJP1>3.0.CO;2-K 11051442 · DOI
  22. [35]Gebregeziabhear E. The Effect of Stress on Productivity of Animals: A review J. Biol. Agric. Healthc. 2015 15 14 22
  23. [36]Janzen W.J. Duncan C.A. Riley L.G. Cortisol treatment reduces ghrelin signaling and food intake in tilapia, Oreochromis mossambicus Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 2012 3 251 259 10.1016/j.domaniend.2012.04.003 22657576 · DOI
  24. [37]Lindsay W.K. Habitat Use, Diet Choice, and Nutritional Status in Female and Male Amboseli Elephants The Amboseli Elephants: A Long-Term Perspective on a Long-Lived Mammal Moss C. Croze H. Lee P.C. The University of Chicago Press Chicago, IL, USA 2011 51 73
  25. [44]Schulte B. Social Structure and Helping Behaviour in Captive Elephants Zoo Biol. 2000 5 447 459 10.1002/1098-2361(2000)19:5<447::AID-ZOO12>3.0.CO;2-# · DOI
  26. [45]Kowalski N. Dale R. Mazur C. A survey of the management and development of captive African elephant (Loxodonta africana) calves: Birth to three month of age Zoo Biol. 2010 29 104 119 10.1002/zoo.20195 20391463 · DOI
  27. [46]Kappeler P. Verhaltensbiologie Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany 2020
  28. [48]Martin P. Bateson P.P.G. Measuring Behaviour: An Introductory Guide 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK 2007
  29. [49]Naguib M. Krause E.T. Methoden der Verhaltensbiologie Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany 2020
  30. [51]Kahl M.P. Armstrong B.D. Visual and tactile displays in African elephants, Loxodonta africana: A progress report (1991–1997) Elephant 2000 2 19 21 10.22237/elephant/1521732201 · DOI
  31. [52]Williams E. Carter A. Hall C. Bremner-Harrison S. Social Interactions in Zoo-Housed Elephants: Factors Affecting Social Relationships Animals 2019 9 747 10.3390/ani9100747 31569551 PMC6826554 · DOI · Paper page
  32. [54]Agresti A. An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis 2nd ed. Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics Wiley-Interscience Hoboken, NJ, USA Chichester, UK 2007
  33. [56]Dinneen L.C. Blakesley B.C. Algorithm AS 62: A Generator for the Sampling Distribution of the Mann-Whitney U Statistic Appl. Stat. 1973 22 269 10.2307/2346934 · DOI
  34. [57]Ruxton G.D. The unequal variance t-test is an underused alternative to Student’s t-test and the Mann-Whitney U test Behav. Ecol. 2006 17 688 690 10.1093/beheco/ark016 · DOI · Paper page
  35. [58]Bortz J. Döring N. Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation: Für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler Springer Medizin Verlag Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany 2006
  36. [59]Siegel S. Castellan N.J. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Boston, MS, USA 1988
  37. [62]Kubinger K.D. Rasch D. Moder K. Zur Legende der Voraussetzungen des t -Tests für unabhängige Stichproben Psychol. Rundsch. 2009 60 26 27 10.1026/0033-3042.60.1.26 · DOI
  38. [63]Lakens D. Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs Front. Psychol. 2013 4 863 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863 24324449 PMC3840331 · DOI · Paper page
  39. [64]Rasch D. Kubinger K.D. Moder K. The two-sample t test: Pre-testing its assumptions does not pay off Stat. Pap. 2011 52 219 231 10.1007/s00362-009-0224-x · DOI
  40. [65]Fritz C.O. Morris P.E. Richler J.J. Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2012 141 2 18 10.1037/a0024338 21823805 · DOI · Paper page
  41. [66]Byrne R.W. Bates L.A. Moss C.J. Elephant cognition in primate perspective Comp. Cogn. Behav. Rev. 2009 4 65 79 10.3819/ccbr.2009.40009 · DOI
  42. [68]Lee P.C. Moss C. Calf Development and Maternal Rearing Strategies The Amboseli Elephants: A Long-Term Perspective on a Long-Lived Mammal Moss C. Croze H. Lee P.C. The University of Chicago Press Chicago, IL, USA 2011 224 237
  43. [69]Moss C. Lee P.C. Female Reproductive Strategies: Individual Life Histories The Amboseli Elephants: A Long-Term Perspective on a Long-Lived Mammal Moss C. Croze H. Lee P.C. The University of Chicago Press Chicago, IL, USA 2011 187 204
  44. [70]Mutinda H. Poole J.H. Moss C. Decision Making and Leadership in Using the Ecosystem The Amboseli Elephants: A Long-Term Perspective on a Long-Lived Mammal Moss C. Croze H. Lee P.C. The University of Chicago Press Chicago, IL, USA 2011 246 259
  45. [71]Archie E.A. Moss C.J. Alberts S.C. Friends and Relations: Kinship and the Nature of Female Elephant Social Relationships The Amboseli Elephants: A Long-Term Perspective on a Long-Lived Mammal Moss C.J. Croze H. Lee P.C. The University of Chicago Press Chicago, IL, USA 2011 238 245
  46. [72]Kurt F. Elefanten in Zirkus und Zoo Staatliches Museum für Völkerkunde in München (Ed.), Mensch und Elefant Umschau-Verlag Frankfurt am Main, Germany 1994 117 133
  47. [75]Ryan T.P. Sample Size Determination and Power Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics John Wiley & Sons Inc. Hoboken, NJ, USA 2013

Authors
Hörner, F., Oerke, A.-K., Müller, D. W. H., Westerhüs, U., Azogu-Sepe, I., Hruby, J., & Preisfeld, G.
Affiliations
  • Fakultät für Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften, Zoologie und Didaktik der Biologie, University of Wuppertal, Gaußstraße 20, D-42119 Wuppertal, Germany
  • German Primate Center (DE)
  • Halle Zoo (DE)
  • Opel-Zoo Kronberg, Am Opel-Zoo 3, D-61476 Kronberg im Taunus, Germany
  • Serengeti-Park Hodenhagen, Am Safaripark 1, D-29693 Hodenhagen, Germany
  • ZOO Dvůr Králové, Štefánikova 1029, C-544 01 Dvůr Králové nad Labem, Czech Republic
  • University of Wuppertal (DE)
Venue
Animals
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-10-18
Volume
11
Issue
10
Pages
2990
ISSN
2076-2615 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3207079128
Cited by
8
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Animals (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Bergische Universität Wuppertal
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
Loxodonta africana, kin recognition, social behavior, affiliative behavior, agonistic behavior, matrilines, zoo elephants, breeding programmes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review