A review of non-invasive sampling in wildlife disease and health research: what’s new?
Open accessAbstract
In the last decades, wildlife diseases and the health status of animal populations have gained increasing attention from the scientific community as part of a One Health framework. Furthermore, the need for non-invasive sampling methods with a minimal impact on wildlife has become paramount in complying with modern ethical standards and regulations, and to collect high-quality and unbiased data. We analysed the publication trends on non-invasive sampling in wildlife health and disease research and offer a comprehensive review on the different samples that can be collected non-invasively. We retrieved 272 articles spanning from 1998 to 2021, with a rapid increase in number from 2010. Thirty-nine percent of the papers were focussed on diseases, 58% on other health-related topics, and 3% on both. Stress and other physiological parameters were the most addressed research topics, followed by viruses, helminths, and bacterial infections. Terrestrial mammals accounted for 75% of all publications, and faeces were the most widely used sample. Our review of the sampling materials and collection methods highlights that, although the use of some types of samples for specific applications is now consolidated, others are perhaps still underutilised and new technologies may offer future opportunities for an even wider use of non-invasively collected samples.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In elephants, cortisol or its metabolites can be measured in blood, saliva, urine, feces, and hair.
“In the case of elephants, cortisol or its metabolites can be measured in blood, saliva, urine, feces, and hair (103).”
From Comparison of animal welfare assessment tools and methodologies: need for an effective approach for captive elephants in Asia (2024) · cites this paper as [103]
The Saliva and Other Body Fluids section discusses cortisol measurement in saliva, and reference 128 specifically describes salivary cortisol measurement in captive Asian elephants. The Faeces, Urine, and Hair sections discuss hormone measurements in other wildlife, but the paper does not establish the claimed blood, urine, faeces, and hair measurements for elephants. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 222 · Cited by 105
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [97]Foreyt W.J. Veterinary Parasitology Reference Manual John Wiley & Sons Hoboken, NJ, USA 2013 9781118682265
- Authors
- Schilling, A.-K., Mazzamuto, M. V., & Romeo, C.
- Affiliations
- Roslin Institute (GB)
- University of Insubria (IT)
- Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna "Bruno Ubertini" (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Romeo, Claudia
- Venue
- Animals
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2022-07-02
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1719
- ISSN
- 2076-2615 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9265025
- OpenAlex
- W4283785578
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 222
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 3.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Animals (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Zoonotic diseases and public health
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal health and immunology
- Keywords
- non-invasive sampling, wildlife health, wildlife disease, One Health, feces, stress biomarkers, wildlife viruses, helminths, bacterial infection, sample collection methods, publication trends, terrestrial mammals
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review