Social interactions in two groups of zoo-housed adult female Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) that differ in relatedness
Open accessAbstract
Opportunities for positive social interaction are important in captive animals, and social interactions can be used as a welfare indicator. Wild elephants live in related multigenerational herds; however, in captivity they are often managed in less related groups, which could impact the quality of their social interactions, and thus their welfare. Here, we used a limited social network analysis to investigate the social interactions in two groups of four female captive Asian elephants, one of which contained individuals that were all related to one another, whilst the other was a mix of related and unrelated individuals. Data on pairwise social interactions was collected from eight days of video footage using an all-occurrence sampling technique. More affiliative, and fewer agonistic interactions were observed in the related elephant group. Additionally, non-contact displacement was observed at a higher frequency in the related elephant group, which we theorise represents an established functioning hierarchy, avoiding the need for overt aggression over resources. Although kinship is not likely to be the only factor affecting captive elephant social behaviour, these findings support the recommendation that for optimal welfare, elephants should be managed in multigenerational family herds. Evaluations of social interactions such as those conducted here would have wider applicability for aiding the management of any captive social species to identify when groups might be incompatible.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In zoos, a low frequency of aggressive behaviors has been observed compared to affiliative behaviors.
“In zoos, a low frequency of aggressive behaviors has been observed compared to affiliative behaviors (Garaï 1992; Harvey et al., 2018; Makecha et al., 2012), although our subjects showed fewer aggressive behaviors than those reported by Makecha et al. (2012).”
From Characteristics of social relationships in a group of captive Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) in the elephant village in Thailand (2022) · cites this paper as Harvey et al., 2018
Some studies on captive elephants have shown that subadults or juveniles interact in an affiliative manner more frequently than adults.
“Some studies on captive elephants have shown that subadults or juveniles interact in an affiliative manner more frequently than adults (Garaï, 1992; Harvey et al., 2018).”
From Characteristics of social relationships in a group of captive Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) in the elephant village in Thailand (2022) · cites this paper as Harvey et al., 2018
Captive elephants should be held in related, multi-generational groups for optimal welfare.
“Current research suggests that captive elephants should be held in related, multi-generational groups for optimal welfare”
From Continuing challenges of elephant captivity: the captive environment, health issues, and welfare implications (2024) · cites this paper as Harvey et al., 2018
More affiliative behaviors and fewer aggressive behaviors are found among related elephants.
“more affiliative behaviors and fewer aggressive behaviors among related elephants”
From Continuing challenges of elephant captivity: the captive environment, health issues, and welfare implications (2024) · cites this paper as Harvey et al., 2018
Keeping elephants in related, multi-generational groups optimizes welfare.
“supporting the recommendation for keeping elephants in related, multi-generational groups to optimize welfare”
From Continuing challenges of elephant captivity: the captive environment, health issues, and welfare implications (2024) · cites this paper as Harvey et al., 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 19
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- [1]Moss C.J. Poole J.H. Relationships and social structure of African elephants Primate Social Relationships: An Integrated Approach Hinde R.A. Blackwell Scientific Publications Oxford, UK 1983
- [2]Poole J.H. Moss C.J. Elephant Sociality and Complexity: The Scientific Evidence Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore, MD, USA 2008 9780801888182
- [5]Poole J.H. Granli P. Signals, Gestures, and Behavior of African Elephants The Amboseli Elephants University of Chicago Press Chicago, IL, USA 109 124
- [24]Clubb R. Mason G. A Review of the Welfare of Zoo Elephants in Europe University of Oxford Oxford, UK 2002
- Authors
- Harvey, N. D., Daly, C., Clark, N., Ransford, E., Wallace, S., & Yon, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Yon, Lisa
- Venue
- Animals
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2018-08-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 132
- ISSN
- 2076-2615 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6115912
- OpenAlex
- W2887864604
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 4.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- dx.doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Animals (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham) (acceptedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Keywords
- Asian elephant, captive elephants, social interaction, kinship, relatedness, social network analysis, affiliative behavior, agonistic behavior, displacement behavior, social hierarchy, animal welfare, group management, female elephants
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review