Cited by 23Vector-borne infectious diseasesBrucella: diagnosis, epidemiology, treatmentSyphilis Diagnosis and Treatment

“Repurposing” Disulfiram in the Treatment of Lyme Disease and Babesiosis: Retrospective Review of First 3 Years’ Experience in One Medical Practice

Open access
Gao, Jiachen, Gong, Zhaodi, Montesano, Dawn, Glazer, Erica, Liegner, Kenneth·2020·Antibiotics

Abstract

A total of 71 patients with Lyme disease were identified for analysis in whom treatment with disulfiram was initiated between 15 March 2017 and 15 March 2020. Four patients were lost to follow-up, leaving 67 evaluable patients. Our retrospective review found patients to fall into a “high-dose” group (≥4 mg/kg/day) and a “low-dose” group (<4 mg/kg/day). In total, 62 of 67 (92.5%) patients treated with disulfiram were able to endorse a net benefit of the treatment with regard to their symptoms. Moreover, 12 of 33 (36.4%) patients who completed one or two courses of “high-dose” therapy enjoyed an “enduring remission”, defined as remaining clinically well for ≥6 months without further anti-infective treatment. The most common adverse reactions from disulfiram treatment in the high-dose group were fatigue (66.7%), psychiatric symptoms (48.5%), peripheral neuropathy (27.3%), and mild to moderate elevation of liver enzymes (15.2%). We observed that although patients on high dose experienced a higher risk for adverse reactions than those on a low dose, high-dose patients were significantly more likely to achieve enduring remission.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/antibiotics9120868

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 23

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. [4]Preac-Mursic V. Wilske B. Gross B. Weber K. Pfister H.W. Baumann A. Prokop J. Survival of Borrelia burgdorferi in antibiotically treated patients with Lyme borreliosis Infection 1989 17 355 359 10.1007/BF01645543 2613324 · DOI
  2. [5]Häupl T. Hahn G. Rittig M. Krause A. Schoerner C. Schönherr U. Kalden J.R. Burmester G.R. Persistence of borrelia burgdorferi in ligamentous tissue from a patient with chronic Lyme borreliosis Arthritis Rheum. 1993 36 1621 1626 10.1002/art.1780361118 8240439 · DOI
  3. [6]Lawrence C. Lipton R.B. Lowy F.D. Coyle P.K. Seronegative chronic relapsing neuroborreliosis Eur. Neurol. 1995 35 113 117 10.1159/000117104 7796837 · DOI
  4. [7]Shor S. Green C. Szantyr B. Phillips S. Liegner K. Burrascano J. Bransfield R. Maloney E.L. Chronic Lyme Disease: An Evidence-Based Definition by the ILADS Working Group Antibiotics 2019 8 269 10.3390/antibiotics8040269 PMC6963229 31888310 · DOI
  5. [8]Stricker R.B. Fesler M.C. Chronic Lyme Disease: A Working Case Definition Am. J. Infect. Dis. 2018 14 1 44 10.3844/ajidsp.2018.1.44 · DOI
  6. [9]Rebman A.W. Aucott J.N. Post-treatment Lyme Disease as a Model for Persistent Symptoms in Lyme Disease Front. Med. (Lausanne) 2020 25 7 57 10.3389/fmed.2020.00057 PMC7052487 32161761 · DOI
  7. [10]Firstenberg M. Kornbau C. Lee K. Hughes G. Central line complications Int. J. Crit. Illn. Inj. Sci. 2015 5 170 178 10.4103/2229-5151.164940 26557487 PMC4613416 · DOI
  8. [11]Smits W.K. Lyras D. Lacy D.B. Wilcox M.H. Kuijper E.J. Clostridium difficile infection Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2016 2 10.1038/nrdp.2016.20 PMC5453186 27158839 · DOI
  9. [12]Feng J. Auwaerter P.G. Zhang Y. Drug Combinations against Borrelia burgdorferi Persisters In Vitro: Eradication Achieved by Using Daptomycin, Cefoperazone and Doxycycline PLoS ONE 2015 10 10.1371/journal.pone.0117207 PMC4373819 25806811 · DOI
  10. [13]Feng J. Wang T. Zhang S. Shi W. Zhang Y. An Optimized SYBR Green I/PI Assay for Rapid Viability Assessment and Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing for Borrelia burgdorferi PLoS ONE 2014 9 10.1371/journal.pone.0111809 25365247 PMC4218821 · DOI
  11. [14]Feng J. Weitner M. Shi W. Zhang S. Zhang Y. Eradication of Biofilm-Like Microcolony Structures of Borrelia burgdorferi by Daunomycin and Daptomycin but not Mitomycin C in Combination with Doxycycline and Cefuroxime Front. Microbiol. 2016 10 62 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00062 26903956 PMC4748043 · DOI
  12. [15]Feng J. Zhang S. Shi W. Zhang Y. Ceftriaxone Pulse Dosing Fails to Eradicate Biofilm-Like Microcolony B. burgdorferi Persisters Which Are Sterilized by Daptomycin/ Doxycycline/Cefuroxime without Pulse Dosing Front. Microbiol. 2016 4 1744 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01744 27867375 PMC5095124 · DOI
  13. [16]Stricker R. Sapi E. Evaluation of in-vitro antibiotic susceptibility of different morphological forms of Borrelia burgdorferi Infect. Drug Resist. 2011 4 97 113 10.2147/IDR.S19201 21753890 PMC3132871 · DOI
  14. [17]Pothineni V.R. Wagh D. Babar M.M. Inayathullah M. Solow-Cordero D. Kim K. Samineni A.V. Parekh M.B. Tayebi L. Rajadas J. Identification of new drug candidates against Borrelia burgdorferi using high-throughput screening Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2016 10 1307 1322 10.2147/DDDT.S101486 PMC4827596 27103785 · DOI
  15. [20]Berger M.L. Sox H. Willke R.J. Brixner D.L. Eichler H. Goettsch W. Madigan D. Makady A. Schneeweiss S. Tarricone R. Good practices for real-world data studies of treatment and/or comparative effectiveness: Recommendations from the joint ISPOR-ISPE Special Task Force on real-world evidence in health care decision making Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 2017 26 1033 1039 10.1002/pds.4297 28913966 PMC5639372 · DOI
  16. [21]Lillie E.O. Patay B. Diamant J. Issell B. Topol E.J. Schork N.J. The n-of-1 clinical trial: The ultimate strategy for individualizing medicine? Per. Med. 2011 8 161 173 10.2217/pme.11.7 21695041 PMC3118090 · DOI · Paper page
  17. [22]Potula H.S. Shahryari J. Inayathullah M. Malkovskiy A.V. Kim K. Rajadas J. Repurposing Disulfiram (Tetraethylthiuram Disulfide) as a Potential Drug Candidate against Borrelia burgdorferi In Vitro and In Vivo Antibiotics 2020 9 633 10.3390/antibiotics9090633 PMC7557442 32971817 · DOI
  18. [23]Boylan J.A. Hummel C.S. Benoit S. Garcia-Lara J. Treglown-Downey J. Crane E.J. Gherardini F.C. Borrelia burgdorferi bb0728 encodes a coenzyme A disulphide reductase whose function suggests a role in intracellular redox and the oxidative stress response Mol. Microbiol. 2006 59 475 486 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04963.x 16390443 · DOI
  19. [24]Troxell B. Ye M. Yang Y. Carrasco S.E. Lou Y. Yang X.F. Manganese and Zinc Regulate Virulence Determinants in Borrelia burgdorferi Infect. Immun. 2013 81 2743 2752 10.1128/IAI.00507-13 23690398 PMC3719580 · DOI
  20. [25]Pothineni V.R. Wagh D. Inayathullah M. Liu S. Kim K. Rajadas J. Borreliacidal activity of Borrelia metal transporter A (BmtA) binding small molecules by manganese transport inhibition Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2015 9 805 816 10.2147/DDDT.S77063 25709405 PMC4330029 · DOI
  21. [26]Sapi E. Kasliwala R.S. Ismail H. Torres J.P. Oldakowski M. Markland S. Gaur G. Melillo A. Eisendle K. Liegner K.B. The Long-Term Persistence of Borrelia burgdorferi Antigens and DNA in the Tissues of a Patient with Lyme Disease Antibiotics 2019 8 183 10.3390/antibiotics8040183 31614557 PMC6963883 · DOI
  22. [27]Brugnone F. Maranelli G. Zotti S. Zanella I. Paris P.D. Caroldi S. Betta A. Blood concentration of carbon disulphide in “normal” subjects and in alcoholic subjects treated with disulfiram Br. J. Ind. Med. 1992 49 658 663 10.1136/oem.49.9.658 1390273 PMC1039312 · DOI
  23. [28]Sapi E. Bastian S.L. Mpoy C.M. Scott S. Rattelle A. Pabbati N. Poruri A. Burugu D. Theophilus P.A.S. Pham T.V. Characterization of Biofilm Formation by Borrelia burgdorferi In Vitro PLoS ONE 2012 7 10.1371/journal.pone.0048277 23110225 PMC3480481 · DOI
  24. [29]Alvarez-Manzo H.S. Zhang Y. Shi W. Zhang Y. Evaluation of Disulfiram Drug Combinations and Identification of Other More Effective Combinations against Stationary Phase Borrelia burgdorferi Antibiotics 2020 9 542 10.3390/antibiotics9090542 PMC7559458 32858987 · DOI
  25. [30]Wright C. Moore R.D. Disulfiram treatment of alcoholism Am. J. Med. 1990 88 647 655 10.1016/0002-9343(90)90534-K 2189310 · DOI · Paper page
  26. [31]Faiman M.D. Jensen J.C. Lacoursiere R.B. Elimination kinetics of disulfiram in alcoholics after single and repeated doses Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 1984 36 520 526 10.1038/clpt.1984.213 6090051 · DOI
  27. [32]Christensen J.K. Rønsted P. Vaag U.H. Side effects after disulfiram. Comparison of disulfiram and placebo in a double-blind multicentre study Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 1984 69 265 273 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1984.tb02496.x 6372372 · DOI
  28. [33]Trautmann A. Gascan H. Ghozzi R. Potential patient-reported toxicities with disulfiram treatment in late disseminated Lyme disease Front. Med. (Lausanne) 2020 7 133 10.3389/fmed.2020.00133 32373619 PMC7184924 · DOI
  29. [34]Bertrand E. Szpak G.M. Piłkowska E. Habib N. Lipczyńska-Lojkowska W. Rudnicka A. Tylewska-Wierzbanowska S. Kulczycki J. Central nervous system infection caused by Borrelia burgdorferi. Clinico-pathological correlation of three post-mortem cases Folia Neuropathol. 1999 37 43 51 10337063
  30. [36]Fallon B.A. Zubcevik N. Bennett C. Doshi S. Rebman A.W. Kishon R. Moeller J.R. Octavien N.R. Aucott J.N. The General Symptom Questionnaire-30 (GSQ-30): A Brief Measure of Multi-System Symptom Burden in Lyme Disease Front. Med. (Lausanne) 2019 6 283 10.3389/fmed.2019.00283 31867334 PMC6908481 · DOI
  31. [37]Zhang K. Dong R. Sun K. Wang X. Wang J. Yang C.S. Zhang J. Synergistic toxicity of epigallocatechin-3-gallate and diethyldithiocarbamate, a lethal encounter involving redox-active copper Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2017 113 143 156 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2017.09.027 28974447 · DOI

Authors
Gao, J., Gong, Z., Montesano, D., Glazer, E., & Liegner, K.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • CT Integrated Pain Consultants, LLC, 60 Katona Drive, Suite 25, Fairfield, CT 06824, USA
  • P.C. Lyme Borreliosis &amp; Related Disorders, 592 Route 22, Suite 1B, Pawling, NY 12564, USA
  • Northern Westchester Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Liegner, Kenneth
Venue
Antibiotics
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-12-04
Volume
9
Issue
12
Pages
868
ISSN
2079-6382 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3110536849
Cited by
23
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5
FWCI
2.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Antibiotics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Brucella: diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
disulfiram, Lyme disease, babesiosis, drug repurposing, adverse drug reactions, fatigue, peripheral neuropathy, elevated liver enzymes, psychiatric symptoms, tick-borne diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review