The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Semantic Publication of Agricultural Scientific Literature Using Property Graphs
Abstract
During the last decades, there have been significant changes in science that have provoked a big increase in the number of articles published every year. This increment implies a new difficulty for scientists, who have to do an extra effort for selecting literature relevant for their activity. In this work, we present a pipeline for the generation of scientific literature knowledge graphs in the agriculture domain. The pipeline combines Semantic Web and natural language processing technologies, which make data understandable by computer agents, empowering the development of final user applications for literature searches. This workflow consists of (1) RDF generation, including metadata and contents; (2) semantic annotation of the content; and (3) property graph population by adding domain knowledge from ontologies, in addition to the previously generated RDF data describing the articles. This pipeline was applied to a set of 127 agriculture articles, generating a knowledge graph implemented in Neo4j, publicly available on Docker. The potential of our model is illustrated through a series of queries and use cases, which not only include queries about authors or references but also deal with article similarity or clustering based on semantic annotation, which is facilitated by the inclusion of domain ontologies in the graph.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A Friend Of A Friend (FOAF) ontology is used in [71, 73] to materialize implicit knowledge about the social relationships of authors and scientists.”
From Scholarly knowledge graphs through structuring scholarly communication: a review (2023) · cites this paper as [71]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 37
- Frazzetto, 2004, The changing identity of the scientist: As science puts on a new face, the identity of its practitioners evolves accordingly, EMBO Rep., 5, 18, 10.1038/sj.embor.7400061 · DOI
- Price, D.J. (1986). Little Science, Big Science... and Beyond, Columbia University Press.
- Bornmann, 2015, Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 66, 2215, 10.1002/asi.23329 · DOI · Paper page
- Hendler, 2001, The semantic web, Sci. Am., 284, 28
- McGuinness, 2004, OWL web ontology language overview, W3C Recomm., 10, 2004
- Miller, 1998, An introduction to the resource description framework, Bull. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 25, 15, 10.1002/bult.105 · DOI
- Shotton, 2009, Semantic publishing: The coming revolution in scientific journal publishing, Learn. Publ., 22, 85, 10.1087/2009202 · DOI
- Castro, 2013, Biotea: RDFizing PubMed Central in support for the paper as an interface to the Web of Data, J. Biomed. Semant. BioMed. Cent., 4, S5, 10.1186/2041-1480-4-S1-S5 · DOI
- Garcia, 2018, Biotea: Semantics for Pubmed Central, PeerJ, 6, e4201, 10.7717/peerj.4201 · DOI
- Weibel, 1997, The Dublin Core: A simple content description model for electronic resources, Bull. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 24, 9, 10.1002/bult.70 · DOI
- Huh, 2014, Journal Article Tag Suite 1.0: National Information Standards Organization standard of journal extensible markup language, Sci. Ed., 1, 99, 10.6087/kcse.2014.1.99 · DOI
- Guha, 2016, Schema. org: Evolution of structured data on the web, Commun. ACM, 59, 44, 10.1145/2844544 · DOI
- Vanclay, 2011, An evaluation of the Australian Research Council’s journal ranking, J. Inf., 5, 265
- Sporny, 2014, JSON-LD 1.0, W3C Recomm., 16, 41
- Bagnacani, A., Ciancarini, P., Di Iorio, A., Nuzzolese, A.G., Peroni, S., and Vitali, F. (2014). The semantic lancet project: A linked open dataset for scholarly publishing. International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, Springer. · DOI
- Peroni, S., and Shotton, D. (2018). The SPAR ontologies. International Semantic Web Conference, Springer. · DOI
- Gangemi, 2017, Semantic Web Machine Reading with FRED, Semant. Web, 8, 873, 10.3233/SW-160240 · DOI
- Jaradeh, M.Y., Oelen, A., Farfar, K.E., Prinz, M., D’Souza, J., Kismihók, G., Stocker, M., and Auer, S. (2019, January 19–21). Open Research Knowledge Graph: Next Generation Infrastructure for Semantic Scholarly Knowledge. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Knowledge Capture, Marina Del Rey, CA, USA. · DOI
- Penev, L., Dimitrova, M., Senderov, V., Zhelezov, G., Georgiev, T., Stoev, P., and Simov, K. (2019). OpenBiodiv: A Knowledge Graph for Literature-Extracted Linked Open Data in Biodiversity Science. Publications, 7. · DOI · Paper page
- Senderov, 2018, OpenBiodiv-O: Ontology of the OpenBiodiv knowledge management system, J. Biomed. Semant., 9, 5, 10.1186/s13326-017-0174-5 · DOI
- Vrandečić, D. (2012, January 16–20). Wikidata: A new platform for collaborative data collection. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web, Lyon, France. · DOI
- Dumontier, 2014, The Semanticscience Integrated Ontology (SIO) for biomedical research and knowledge discovery, J. Biomed. Semant., 5, 14, 10.1186/2041-1480-5-14 · DOI
- Constantin, 2016, The document components ontology (DoCO), Semant. Web, 7, 167, 10.3233/SW-150177 · DOI
- Ciccarese, 2011, An open annotation ontology for science on web 3.0, J. Biomed. Semant. BioMed Cent., 2, S4, 10.1186/2041-1480-2-S2-S4 · DOI
- Ciccarese, 2013, PAV ontology: Provenance, authoring and versioning, J. Biomed. Semant., 4, 37, 10.1186/2041-1480-4-37 · DOI
- Miller, J.J. (2013, January 8–9). Graph database applications and concepts with Neo4j. Proceedings of the Southern Association for Information Systems Conference, Atlanta, GA, USA.
- Bouhali, R., and Laurent, A. (2015). Exploiting RDF open data using NoSQL graph databases. IFIP International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations, Springer. · DOI
- Jonquet, 2018, AgroPortal: A vocabulary and ontology repository for agronomy, Comput. Electron. Agric., 144, 126, 10.1016/j.compag.2017.10.012 · DOI
- Baker, T., Caracciolo, C., Doroszenko, A., and Suominen, O. (2016). GACS core: Creation of a global agricultural concept scheme. Research Conference on Metadata and Semantics Research, Springer. · DOI
- Avril, 2016, Analyser la production scientifique d’un département de recherche: Construction d’une ressource termino-ontologique par des documentalistes, Cahier des Tech. de l’INRA, 89, 1
- Buttigieg, 2013, The environment ontology: Contextualising biological and biomedical entities, J. Biomed. Semant., 4, 43, 10.1186/2041-1480-4-43 · DOI
- Dooley, 2018, FoodOn: A harmonized food ontology to increase global food traceability, quality control and data integration, NPJ Sci. Food, 2, 23, 10.1038/s41538-018-0032-6 · DOI
- Martini, D., Schmitz, M., and Mietzsch, E. (2013, January 24–27). agroRDF as a Semantic Overlay to agroXML: A General Model for Enhancing Interoperability in Agrifood Data Standards. Proceedings of the CIGR Conference on Sustainable Agriculture through ICT Innovation, Turin, Italy.
- Jackson, R.C., Balhoff, J.P., Douglass, E., Harris, N.L., Mungall, C.J., and Overton, J.A. (2019). ROBOT: A Tool for Automating Ontology Workflows. BMC Bioinform., 20. · DOI
- Galili, T. (2015). dendextend: An R package for visualizing, adjusting, and comparing trees of hierarchical clustering. Bioinformatics. · DOI
- Rousseeuw, 1987, Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 20, 53, 10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Erling, O., and Mikhailov, I. (2009). RDF Support in the Virtuoso DBMS. Networked Knowledge-Networked Media, Springer. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Scholarly knowledge graphs through structuring scholarly communication: a review
Verma, S., Bhatia, R., Harit, S., & Batish, S. (2023) · Complex & Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1007/s40747-022-00806-6 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Abad-Navarro, F., Bernabé-Diaz, J. A., García-Castro, A., & Fernandez-Breis, J. T.
- Venue
- Applied Sciences
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2020-01-26
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 861
- ISSN
- 2076-3417
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Gobierno de España (TIN2017-85949-C2-1-R)
- Fundación Séneca (20963/PI/18)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review