Cited by 12

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Semantic Publication of Agricultural Scientific Literature Using Property Graphs

Abad-Navarro, Francisco, Bernabé-Diaz, José Antonio, García-Castro, Alexander, Fernandez-Breis, Jesualdo Tomás·2020·Applied Sciences

Abstract

During the last decades, there have been significant changes in science that have provoked a big increase in the number of articles published every year. This increment implies a new difficulty for scientists, who have to do an extra effort for selecting literature relevant for their activity. In this work, we present a pipeline for the generation of scientific literature knowledge graphs in the agriculture domain. The pipeline combines Semantic Web and natural language processing technologies, which make data understandable by computer agents, empowering the development of final user applications for literature searches. This workflow consists of (1) RDF generation, including metadata and contents; (2) semantic annotation of the content; and (3) property graph population by adding domain knowledge from ontologies, in addition to the previously generated RDF data describing the articles. This pipeline was applied to a set of 127 agriculture articles, generating a knowledge graph implemented in Neo4j, publicly available on Docker. The potential of our model is illustrated through a series of queries and use cases, which not only include queries about authors or references but also deal with article similarity or clustering based on semantic annotation, which is facilitated by the inclusion of domain ontologies in the graph.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/app10030861

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Frazzetto, 2004, The changing identity of the scientist: As science puts on a new face, the identity of its practitioners evolves accordingly, EMBO Rep., 5, 18, 10.1038/sj.embor.7400061 · DOI
  2. Price, D.J. (1986). Little Science, Big Science... and Beyond, Columbia University Press.
  3. Bornmann, 2015, Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 66, 2215, 10.1002/asi.23329 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Hendler, 2001, The semantic web, Sci. Am., 284, 28
  5. McGuinness, 2004, OWL web ontology language overview, W3C Recomm., 10, 2004
  6. Miller, 1998, An introduction to the resource description framework, Bull. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 25, 15, 10.1002/bult.105 · DOI
  7. Shotton, 2009, Semantic publishing: The coming revolution in scientific journal publishing, Learn. Publ., 22, 85, 10.1087/2009202 · DOI
  8. Castro, 2013, Biotea: RDFizing PubMed Central in support for the paper as an interface to the Web of Data, J. Biomed. Semant. BioMed. Cent., 4, S5, 10.1186/2041-1480-4-S1-S5 · DOI
  9. Garcia, 2018, Biotea: Semantics for Pubmed Central, PeerJ, 6, e4201, 10.7717/peerj.4201 · DOI
  10. Weibel, 1997, The Dublin Core: A simple content description model for electronic resources, Bull. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 24, 9, 10.1002/bult.70 · DOI
  11. Huh, 2014, Journal Article Tag Suite 1.0: National Information Standards Organization standard of journal extensible markup language, Sci. Ed., 1, 99, 10.6087/kcse.2014.1.99 · DOI
  12. Guha, 2016, Schema. org: Evolution of structured data on the web, Commun. ACM, 59, 44, 10.1145/2844544 · DOI
  13. Vanclay, 2011, An evaluation of the Australian Research Council’s journal ranking, J. Inf., 5, 265
  14. Sporny, 2014, JSON-LD 1.0, W3C Recomm., 16, 41
  15. Bagnacani, A., Ciancarini, P., Di Iorio, A., Nuzzolese, A.G., Peroni, S., and Vitali, F. (2014). The semantic lancet project: A linked open dataset for scholarly publishing. International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, Springer. · DOI
  16. Peroni, S., and Shotton, D. (2018). The SPAR ontologies. International Semantic Web Conference, Springer. · DOI
  17. Gangemi, 2017, Semantic Web Machine Reading with FRED, Semant. Web, 8, 873, 10.3233/SW-160240 · DOI
  18. Jaradeh, M.Y., Oelen, A., Farfar, K.E., Prinz, M., D’Souza, J., Kismihók, G., Stocker, M., and Auer, S. (2019, January 19–21). Open Research Knowledge Graph: Next Generation Infrastructure for Semantic Scholarly Knowledge. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Knowledge Capture, Marina Del Rey, CA, USA. · DOI
  19. Penev, L., Dimitrova, M., Senderov, V., Zhelezov, G., Georgiev, T., Stoev, P., and Simov, K. (2019). OpenBiodiv: A Knowledge Graph for Literature-Extracted Linked Open Data in Biodiversity Science. Publications, 7. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Senderov, 2018, OpenBiodiv-O: Ontology of the OpenBiodiv knowledge management system, J. Biomed. Semant., 9, 5, 10.1186/s13326-017-0174-5 · DOI
  21. Vrandečić, D. (2012, January 16–20). Wikidata: A new platform for collaborative data collection. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web, Lyon, France. · DOI
  22. Dumontier, 2014, The Semanticscience Integrated Ontology (SIO) for biomedical research and knowledge discovery, J. Biomed. Semant., 5, 14, 10.1186/2041-1480-5-14 · DOI
  23. Constantin, 2016, The document components ontology (DoCO), Semant. Web, 7, 167, 10.3233/SW-150177 · DOI
  24. Ciccarese, 2011, An open annotation ontology for science on web 3.0, J. Biomed. Semant. BioMed Cent., 2, S4, 10.1186/2041-1480-2-S2-S4 · DOI
  25. Ciccarese, 2013, PAV ontology: Provenance, authoring and versioning, J. Biomed. Semant., 4, 37, 10.1186/2041-1480-4-37 · DOI
  26. Miller, J.J. (2013, January 8–9). Graph database applications and concepts with Neo4j. Proceedings of the Southern Association for Information Systems Conference, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  27. Bouhali, R., and Laurent, A. (2015). Exploiting RDF open data using NoSQL graph databases. IFIP International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations, Springer. · DOI
  28. Jonquet, 2018, AgroPortal: A vocabulary and ontology repository for agronomy, Comput. Electron. Agric., 144, 126, 10.1016/j.compag.2017.10.012 · DOI
  29. Baker, T., Caracciolo, C., Doroszenko, A., and Suominen, O. (2016). GACS core: Creation of a global agricultural concept scheme. Research Conference on Metadata and Semantics Research, Springer. · DOI
  30. Avril, 2016, Analyser la production scientifique d’un département de recherche: Construction d’une ressource termino-ontologique par des documentalistes, Cahier des Tech. de l’INRA, 89, 1
  31. Buttigieg, 2013, The environment ontology: Contextualising biological and biomedical entities, J. Biomed. Semant., 4, 43, 10.1186/2041-1480-4-43 · DOI
  32. Dooley, 2018, FoodOn: A harmonized food ontology to increase global food traceability, quality control and data integration, NPJ Sci. Food, 2, 23, 10.1038/s41538-018-0032-6 · DOI
  33. Martini, D., Schmitz, M., and Mietzsch, E. (2013, January 24–27). agroRDF as a Semantic Overlay to agroXML: A General Model for Enhancing Interoperability in Agrifood Data Standards. Proceedings of the CIGR Conference on Sustainable Agriculture through ICT Innovation, Turin, Italy.
  34. Jackson, R.C., Balhoff, J.P., Douglass, E., Harris, N.L., Mungall, C.J., and Overton, J.A. (2019). ROBOT: A Tool for Automating Ontology Workflows. BMC Bioinform., 20. · DOI
  35. Galili, T. (2015). dendextend: An R package for visualizing, adjusting, and comparing trees of hierarchical clustering. Bioinformatics. · DOI
  36. Rousseeuw, 1987, Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 20, 53, 10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Erling, O., and Mikhailov, I. (2009). RDF Support in the Virtuoso DBMS. Networked Knowledge-Networked Media, Springer. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 12

Metadata

Authors
Abad-Navarro, F., Bernabé-Diaz, J. A., García-Castro, A., & Fernandez-Breis, J. T.
Venue
Applied Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-01-26
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
861
ISSN
2076-3417
Cited by
12
References
0
Language
en
Funders
  • Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Gobierno de España (TIN2017-85949-C2-1-R)
  • Fundación Séneca (20963/PI/18)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review