Cited by 17Algal biology and biofuel productionMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionAquaculture Nutrition and Growth

Starch Rich Chlorella vulgaris: High-Throughput Screening and Up-Scale for Tailored Biomass Production

Open access
Carnovale, Giorgia, Rosa, Filipa, Shapaval, Volha, Dzurendova, Simona, Kohler, Achim, Wicklund, Trude, Horn, Svein Jarle, Barbosa, Maria J. +1 more·2021·Applied Sciences

Abstract

The use of microalgal starch has been studied in biorefinery frameworks to produce bioethanol or bioplastics, however, these products are currently not economically viable. Using starch-rich biomass as an ingredient in food applications is a novel way to create more value while expanding the product portfolio of the microalgal industry. Optimization of starch production in the food-approved species Chlorella vulgaris was the main objective of this study. High-throughput screening of biomass composition in response to multiple stressors was performed with FTIR spectroscopy. Nitrogen starvation was identified as an important factor for starch accumulation. Moreover, further studies were performed to assess the role of light distribution, investigating the role of photon supply rates in flat panel photobioreactors. Starch-rich biomass with up to 30% starch was achieved in cultures with low inoculation density (0.1 g L−1) and high irradiation (1800 µmol m−2 s−1). A final large-scale experiment was performed in 25 L tubular reactors, achieving a maximum of 44% starch in the biomass after 12 h in nitrogen starved conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/app11199025

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The microalgae high-throughput screening system HTS-MAB developed by Wageningen University integrates machine learning and real-time image analysis to automatically select the most productive microalgae strains under dynamically changing cultivation conditions.

    “One example of an advanced research platform is the microalgae high-throughput screening system (HTS-MAB) developed by Wageningen University, which integrates machine learning and real-time image analysis to automatically select the most productive microalgae strains under dynamically changing cultivation conditions [259].”

    From Multi-Sensing Monitoring of the Microalgae Biomass Cultivation Systems for Biofuels and Added Value Products Synthesis—Challenges and Opportunities (2025) · cites this paper as [259]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 66 · Cited by 17

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Harris, E.H. Chlamydomonas in the Laboratory. In The Chlamydomonas Sourcebook; Academic Press Inc.: San Diego, CA, USA, 2009; pp. 241-302.

Authors
Carnovale, G., Rosa, F., Shapaval, V., Dzurendova, S., Kohler, A., Wicklund, T., Horn, S. J., Barbosa, M. J., & Skjånes, K.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NO)
  • Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO)
  • Faculty of Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), P.O. Box 5003, 1432 Ås, Norway
  • Bioprocess Engineering, AlgaePARC, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
Corresponding author
Skjånes, Kari
Venue
Applied Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-09-28
Volume
11
Issue
19
Pages
9025
ISSN
2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3202254366
Cited by
17
References
66
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Norges Forskningsråd (267872)
  • NordForsk (82845)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
Keywords
Chlorella vulgaris, starch accumulation, nitrogen starvation, high-throughput screening, FTIR spectroscopy, light distribution, flat panel photobioreactor, tubular photobioreactor, inoculation density, biomass composition, biorefinery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review