CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 118Spam and Phishing DetectionInformation and Cyber SecurityUser Authentication and Security Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Study on the Psychology of Social Engineering-Based Cyberattacks and Existing Countermeasures

Open access
Siddiqi, Murtaza Ahmed, Pak, Wooguil, Siddiqi, Moquddam A.·2022·Applied Sciences
DOI 10.3390/app12126042
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

As cybersecurity strategies become more robust and challenging, cybercriminals are mutating cyberattacks to be more evasive. Recent studies have highlighted the use of social engineering by criminals to exploit the human factor in an organization’s security architecture. Social engineering attacks exploit specific human attributes and psychology to bypass technical security measures for malicious acts. Social engineering is becoming a pervasive approach used for compromising individuals and organizations (is relatively more convenient to compromise a human compared to discovering a vulnerability in the security system). Social engineering-based cyberattacks are extremely difficult to counter as they do not follow specific patterns or approaches for conducting an attack, making them highly effective, efficient, easy, and obscure approaches for compromising any organization. To counter such attacks, a better understanding of the attack tactics is highly essential. Hence, this paper provides an in-depth analysis of the approaches used to conduct social engineering-based cyberattacks. This study discusses human vulnerabilities employed by criminals in recent security breaches. Further, the paper highlights the existing approaches, including machine learning-based methods, to counter social engineering-based cyberattacks.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/app12126042

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Siddiqi, 2016, Advanced persistent threats defense techniques: A review, Pak. J. Comput. Inf. Syst., 1, 53
  2. Govindankutty, 2021, Is human error paving way to cyber security?, Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol., 8, 4174
  3. Grover, A., Berghel, H., and Cobb, D. (2011). Advances in Computers, Academic Press.
  4. Albahar, 2019, Deepfakes: Threats and countermeasures systematic review, J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol., 97, 3242
  5. Gass, R.H. (2015). International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, Elsevier. [2nd ed.].
  6. Foa, E.B., and Foa, U.G. (2012). Handbook of Social Resource Theory, Springer. [2012th ed.].
  7. Guadagno, R.E., and Cialdini, R.B. (2009). The Social Net: The Social Psychology of the Internet, Oxford University Press. [1st ed.].
  8. Mitnick, K.D., Simon, W.L., and Wozniak, S. (2003). The Art of Deception: Controlling the Human Element of Security, Wiley. [1st ed.].
  9. Leary, M.R. (1996). Self-Presentation Impression Management And Interpersonal Behavior, Routledge. [1st ed.].
  10. (2021, September 20). Social Engineering as a Threat to Societies: The Cambridge Analytica Case. Available online: https://thestrategybridge.org/the-bridge/2018/7/18/social-engineering-as-a-threat-to-societies-the-cambridge-analytica-case.
  11. (2022, May 20). Network Intrusion Detection Techniques Using Machine Learning. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349392282_Network_Intrusion_Detection_Techniques_using_Machine_Learning.
  12. Cano, 2019, The human factor in information security: The weakest link or the most fatigued?, Inf. Syst. Audit. Control Assoc., 5, 1
  13. Bada, M., Sasse, A.M., and Nurse, J. (2015, January 26). Cyber security awareness campaigns: Why do they fail to change behavior?. Proceedings of the International Conference on Cyber Security for Sustainable Society (ICCSSS), Coventry, UK.
  14. Mortan, E.A. (2021). Cyber Security and Supply Chain Management: Risk, Challenges, and Solutions, World Scientific Publishing. [1st ed.].
  15. Sibrian, J. (2021). Sensitive Data? Now That’s a Catch! the Psychology of Phishing, Chapter 3-Sensitive Data? Now That’s a Catch! The Psychology of Phishing. [Bachelor’s Thesis, Harvard College].

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 118

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Siddiqi, M. A., Pak, W., & Siddiqi, M. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Karachi (PK)
  • Yeungnam University (KR)
Corresponding author
Pak, Wooguil
ORCID
Venue
Applied Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-06-14
Volume
12
Issue
12
Pages
6042
ISSN
2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3390/app12126042
OpenAlex
W4282920965
Cited by
118
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 4
FWCI
23.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) (NRF-2022R1A2C1011774)
  • 2022 Yeungnam University (NRF-2022R1A2C1011774)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
Keywords
social engineering, cyberattacks, human factors in security, human vulnerability, offensive strategy, countermeasures, machine learning detection, security breaches, psychological manipulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review